search for: slob

In the latest version R2.7.0 the following command does not work anymore: x <- eval(parse(prompt = paste("give value for x > "))) It does give the pompt, but the object x is not created. We think this is due to a bug in the function parse. best regards, Wout Slob ____________________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER: http://www.rivm.nl/disclaimer.htm\ ...{{dro...{{dropped:3}}

Hello, everyone. No need to read this message. I'm posting for documentation for other poor, ignorant slobs like me who are struggling to pull together the many technologies to make converged networks happen. Hopefully, this will help save someone else the time I spent. I started the below email until I realized I had solved multiple parts of a compound problem but not all at the same time. When I put...

...#39;t detect cross-functions mispairings, i.e. > allocation in one function, free in another funtion. Hey Denis, thanks for those patches. If possible, it's probably better to not require these pairings and use a single standard kfree/free function. Given the existing ifs in kfree in slab/slob/slub, it seems likely that adding a few more wouldn't have much impact.

On 2020-05-23 11:58, Greg Bailey wrote: > On 5/22/20 12:28 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> CentOS 6 has Thunderbird 68.8.0 >> CentOS 8 has Thunderbird 68.7.0 >> >> When I rsync my .thunderbird folder from my CentOS 6 machine to my >> CentOS 8 machine and start Thunderbird it says: >> >> "A newer version of Thunderbird may

v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()

v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()

I''m trying to figure out how Ruby in general, and/or anything extra Rails may have, can talk to Java APIs of third party server apps. After quite a few search attempts net-wide and on ruby forums, and with "Programming Ruby" in hand, I''m coming up with zilch. Either I''m not finding it, or I''m not recognizing it. I''m assuming there has

OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct: "We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs isolated from changes to your models." (http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html