search for: slh

Another thing to consider about your feature idea is that the output may be noisy depending on what you were hoping for. SLH tries to mitigate anything that could potentially be a problem and thus it instruments almost every branch, load, and function entry, for example. There isn't a lot of signal about what is really a gadget among the code instrumented by SLH. It really tries to be comprehensive and to avoid missi...

Hi I think llvm-dev list (CC'ed) have more visibility in this. On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 22:18, milsegv via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It may not be the best place to ask this but I found nothing on the > internet about it. > I'm working on Spectre V1 detection and stumbled upon the mitigation > provided by clang, the

Gunnar, Check (ll -d dirname) to make sure that there is at least x permission for everyone in each directory down the /var/adm/slh/samba/locks path; also, does the STATUS..LCK file exist in the named directory, and if so what are the permissions on it? Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Bakken, Gunnar [mailto:bakkengj@mail.slh.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:08 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org&...

...ng /tmp No path in service lj4si - using /tmp No path in service lyle4 - using /tmp No path in service steve4 - using /tmp No path in service lp - using /tmp No path in service lp2 - using /tmp No path in service color - using /tmp using configfile = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf lockdir = /var/adm/slh/samba/locks Couldn't open status file /var/adm/slh/samba/locks/STATUS..LCK $ # pwd /var/adm/slh # ls -l total 24 drwxrwxrwx 2 root sys 1024 Jan 16 04:45 CheckMountedFileSystems drwxrwxrwx 2 root sys 1024 Jan 16 05:01 MonitorLabuxSpace drwxrwxrwx 3 root...

Have just upgraded to samba 1.9.18p3 on a RedHat 5.0 linux system... now... when i type smbstatus... this is what i get.. Couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/STATUS..LCK so i assume that for some reason... this status file is not created upon startup.. Pat.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:40:40AM -0500, libvirt_users@skagitattic.com wrote: > So you are saying when I do the virt-sparsify its converting the image > from raw to [qcow2]? No. virt-sparsify will use the same input and output formats, unless you use the --convert option. > I studied the man page for virt-sparsify and tried again with > the flag "--format raw"

...it can access the LDAP server. smbpasswd -w <password> I did this whithout problems. >From this point on all the LDAP related information in SHC applies to Samba 2.2.x. It talks about sambaSamAccount, but all described parameters apply to the Samba 2.2.x sambaAccount. So I switch to SLH. 4. The first relevant thing I find is that there are some Ldap basic entries (also with posixAccount). SLH says: "In the [SAMBA_3_0] and [HEAD] only a few basic entries are required: nobody and administrator BUT an account with uidNumber=0 (root or administrator) MUST ?be present if you need...

...gt; .... Many more lines here and it turns interactive. Suffice it to > say I did a basic minimal install following the prompts. Nothing > special here. > > This created an image that is 2.5G with a 50G apparent size and > identifies as qcow2 as shown below. > > # ls -slh testimage.qcow2 > 2.5G -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51G Jun 22 20:22 testimage.qcow2 > > # qemu-img info testimage.qcow2 > image: testimage.qcow2 > file format: qcow2 > virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes) > disk size: 2.4G > cluster_size: 65536 >...

...get rid of them is to reboot. I have found a mailing list post of one who seemed to have the same problem. He solved it by upgrading to version 1.1. But in my case this did not help. Is this a known problem? What could I check or do? My system: very up to date debian/sid (sidux) kernel 2.6.27-8.slh.1-sidux-686 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz Filesystem: ext3fs tried dovecot from sid: 1:1.0.15-2.3 tried dovecot from experimental: 1:1.1.2-3 My dovecot.conf is the original debian configuration with only one line changed into: protocols = imaps # dovecot -n # 1.1.2: /etc/dovec...

...it turns interactive. Suffice it to > > say I did a basic minimal install following the prompts. Nothing > > special here. > > > > This created an image that is 2.5G with a 50G apparent size and > > identifies as qcow2 as shown below. > > > > # ls -slh testimage.qcow2 > > 2.5G -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51G Jun 22 20:22 testimage.qcow2 > > > > # qemu-img info testimage.qcow2 > > image: testimage.qcow2 > > file format: qcow2 > > virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes) > > disk size: 2.4...

...MP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2 (2016-04-08) .... Many more lines here and it turns interactive. Suffice it to say I did a basic minimal install following the prompts. Nothing special here. This created an image that is 2.5G with a 50G apparent size and identifies as qcow2 as shown below. # ls -slh testimage.qcow2 2.5G -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51G Jun 22 20:22 testimage.qcow2 # qemu-img info testimage.qcow2 image: testimage.qcow2 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes) disk size: 2.4G cluster_size: 65536 Format specific information: com...

...t may not be a complete mitigation because it relies on enumerating specific side channel mechanisms. However, it is applicable to more variants and styles of gadgets that can reach speculative execution side channels than just traditional Spectre Variant 1 gadgets which speculative load hardening (SLH) targets much more narrowly but more efficiently. While there is a slight risk that this mitigation will be ineffective against future side channels, we believe there is still significant value in closing two side channel classes that are most actively exploited today: control-flow based (branch p...

I would like to compare and contrast code and effects from various different tutorials and sample applications. Can I run, say, a mongrel server from more than one app location? I know I can''t do that if they''re both using port 3000 (I tried), but is it possible to configure some apps to use a different port? Where would I do that? Most of the apps are using mysql databases.

...me know if they don't work for you :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/ogg-dev/attachments/20081218/7acfd568/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: liboggz-slh.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 16508 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/ogg-dev/attachments/20081218/7acfd568/attachment.obj

...river/nouveau Product: xorg Created attachment 102296 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=102296&action=edit kernel log I'm experiencing regular system crashes with the nouveau driver. System info : Host/Kernel/OS "siduxbox" running Linux 3.15-2.slh.6-aptosid-amd64 x86_64 [ sidux 2008-01 ??? - kde-full - (200804120109) ] CPU Info 2x AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-53 256 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm svm ) clocked at [ 800.000 MHz ] Videocard NVIDIA C51 [GeForce Go 6100] [ ] Network cards NVIDIA MCP51 PCI devi...

...gt;> because it relies on enumerating specific side channel mechanisms. However, >> it is applicable to more variants and styles of gadgets that can reach >> speculative execution side channels than just traditional Spectre Variant 1 >> gadgets which speculative load hardening (SLH) targets much more narrowly >> but more efficiently. >> >> While there is a slight risk that this mitigation will be ineffective >> against future side channels, we believe there is still significant value >> in closing two side channel classes that are most actively e...

...specific side channel >>>> mechanisms. However, it is applicable to more variants and styles of >>>> gadgets that can reach speculative execution side channels than just >>>> traditional Spectre Variant 1 gadgets which speculative load hardening >>>> (SLH) targets much more narrowly but more efficiently. >>>> >>>> While there is a slight risk that this mitigation will be ineffective >>>> against future side channels, we believe there is still significant value >>>> in closing two side channel classes t...

...nce to having a list. I’m not sure that convenience warrants the tradeoffs :) LMK what you think! JF > On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:52 PM, Zola Bridges <zbrid at google.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I'm very glad this is moving forward! Just a week or two ago there was an SLH bug that really should've been sent to a group like the one that's being created here. Thanks a bunch, JF, for driving this! > > I'd like to be in this group representing the C++ security team at Google. I maintain two speculative execution side channel attack passes: Speculative...

...>> >> LMK what you think! >> >> JF >> >> >> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:52 PM, Zola Bridges <zbrid at google.com> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone! >> >> I'm very glad this is moving forward! Just a week or two ago there was an >> SLH bug that really should've been sent to a group like the one that's >> being created here. Thanks a bunch, JF, for driving this! >> >> I'd like to be in this group representing the C++ security team at >> Google. I maintain two speculative execution side channel a...

On Fri 07 January 2011 08:14:17 Hubert Kario wrote: > I''d suggest at least > mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid0 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd > if you really want raid0 I don''t fully understand -m or -d. Why would this make a truer raid0 that with no options? Is it necessary to use fdisk on new drives in creating a BTRFS multi-drive array? Or is this all that''s needed: #