search for: sistina

...lso. Stephen, does this look good as far as what I've changed? Sorry, no diffs just yet, the changes are rather smallish though. Thanks. On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris Mason wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:17:06 -0400 > From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> > Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm deadlock with 2.4.x kernel? > > > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 06:32:24 PM -0600 Andreas Dilger > <adilger@turbolinux.com> wrote: > > >> reiserfs should catch blocks that don't have the proper bi...

...] Error 1 And I can't find this rpm on the oracle or the RedHat site. Where can I download this: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm Also, I am going to try this on a shared SCSI lvm partition. I have seen in the documentation that it is untested, but it really is the only alternative to sistina's gfs/lvm solution.

...file /var/spool/mail/j/t/jtl dovecot: Dec 01 13:56:15 Info: imap-login: Login: jtl [69.x.x.x] dovecot: Dec 01 13:56:15 Error: IMAP(jtl): UIDVALIDITY changed (1101926435 -> 110192703 6) in mbox file /var/spool/mail/j/t/jtl Using Thunderbird-0.9. Dovecot is running on RHEL 3, on top of Redhat/Sistina GFS (clustered filesystem.) Currently I'm keeping it on one node to avoid possible GFS locking issues. I'm running with mmap_disabled=yes, mbox format. Most of the 1.0-test builds I have done eventually corrupt their index files, and show strange behavior (click on a message in the...

Hi guys, Is there any way to mount an ext3 fs that is on ro media? I get an error: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem. EXT3-fs: write access unavailable, cannot proceed. Specifically this is with an LVM snapshot.

I've just started using rsync, and it's way cool. I checked the FAQ, the broken mailing list archive search function, and scanned the archives, but didn't see this mentioned. I presume it's a fairly common need: I'm mirroring files automatically and daily from one site to another, and anticipate the day when the size of the files may exceed the size of the destination disk.

...point? > Thanks, > > Try > //windows1/public /home/windows1 smbfs > username=me,password=pass,uid=uid,gid=gid 0 0 > > by uid & gid I mean the numbers not the names. > > > Mark Chappell > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Reply-To: <mmouw@sistina.com> > From: "Montgomery Mouw" <mmouw@sistina.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:45:57 -0600 > Subject: [Samba] Samba with Global File System > > Is it possible to use Linux Samba with a Global File > System and have all &gt...

Hi, This is based on ext3 0.0.5e and latest LVM snapshot from Sistina CVS. I've been playing with LVM snapshotting in that I'd been getting system hangs and trying to help resolve that issue, but in the process today I stumbled upon an interesting side-effect. This is on my laptop, running 2.2.18 with loads of patches and above LVM and ext3. Basically, for...

...t; Lessee, > https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/30x/features/ is the reference. > GFS, Eclipse, Cluster Suite, OpenAFS, ksh93, a set of 'tweak' RPMs (my > favorite being the serial console tweak RPM). Red Hat is pushing to get GFS in the stock kernel. They bought out Sistina for a reason, to keep it GPL. These things don't happen overnight. ;-> GFS was introduced as an add-on, and probably will until it is in the stock kernel -- Red Hat is trying to avoid heavily patching the kernel nowdays (for various reasons). As far as OpenAFS, I assume you mean the server...

...80 ctl 0xE083208A bmdma 0xE0832000 irq 10 ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xE08320C0 ctl 0xE08320CA bmdma 0xE0832008 irq 10 ata1: no device found (phy stat 00000000) scsi0 : sata_sil ata2: no device found (phy stat 00000000) scsi1 : sata_sil device-mapper: 4.4.0-ioctl (2005-01-12) initialised: dm at uk.sistina.com [snip] It's in the area after the sata_sil driver gets loaded that, when the drive is plugged in, the screaming interrupt occurs, and the system hangs. It DOES detect the drive, though. Oh, and let me head off the obvious thing at the pass: I'm not using any pseudo-RAID features o...

Hi everybody! I'm using LVM and ext3 and am very satisfied with it. But now I have the following problem: I have a filesystem on a LV which is in use - files are created, modified and so on. To do a backup I'd like to create a snapshot of this volume which gets backup'd and then dropped. # lvcreate -s -L 20M -n snapshot /dev/vg/data lvcreate -- WARNING: the snapshot will be

...md: raid5 personality registered as nr 4 raid5: automatically using best checksumming function: pIII_sse pIII_sse : 1358.400 MB/sec raid5: using function: pIII_sse (1358.400 MB/sec) md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl (2003-12-10) initialised: dm@uk.sistina.com NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP: routing cache hash table of 1024 buckets, 8Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 16384) NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 17 Bridge firewalling registered md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md:...

I have set up Samba so that all users on my small network can read from my one of my Linux shares as well as write to that share. However, when user A saves a file to that share, user B can't open it -- and vice versa. How can I set up samba so that all files written to that share can be read, modified, and deleted by all users? Thanks in advance for an answer to this question.

Is it possible to use Linux Samba with a Global File System and have all servers reading and writing the same files at the same time? I've heard that Samba maintains a small database that contains meta data type information that is not communicated to other Samba servers. And because Samba sits above the file system, GFS cannot guarantee it has correct information about the files. Does