search for: siloes

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >

Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so

I was playing around again with Windows and when you add members to silos, or remove them, it should not set/unset assigned silo on the user. So I've got a new pull request in Draft state still where I remove that functionality, as well as add some new commands to samba-tool user command. It turned out to be easier to add sub commands to user, as edit user wasn't quite what I thought

I just installed Samba 4.19.1 (Sernet-packages). Here is my smb.conf on my DC ----------------- # Global parameters [global] ad dc functional level = 2016 netbios name = ADDC-01 realm = EXAMPLE.NET server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate

My housemate has formalized a sortof new attack against unix-style operating systems. He''s a BSD fan, so that''s where he developed the attack. He asked me to check Linux, which I did. It seems Linux is not vulnerable to it. This attack is going out to BUGTRAQ tonight. The attack isn''t too serious because it requires physical access to the console, but it

I looked around a little bit, but as far as I can see, at the moment it's not possible to use auth-policies and silos with Samba-DCs only. So I need at least one Windows DC :-( Am 19.10.23 um 11:48 schrieb Stefan Kania via samba: > Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and > silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I

Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I can only create, delete, list and view policies and silos Am 19.10.23 um 09:03 schrieb Daniel M?ller via samba: > Hello, > > You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. > There where

Hello, You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. There where efforts and but ADWS did no reach production status. I think Catalyst, Andrew Bartlett tried someting, did not finish it. Yes you need to use the old RSAT. Gretings Daniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von:

Am 27.10.23 um 02:32 schrieb Rob van der Linde via samba: > The missing functionality is --silo and --policy on modify user, and > probably also create user commands. That's exacly right, that's also the way Windows is handling this.

Hello, I am running a Debian Testin/Unstable system with ii samba 3.0.1-2 a LanManager-like file and printer server fo ii samba-common 3.0.1-2 Samba common files used by both the server a And lately (more or less since the first 3.0 Samba i have been getting a _lot_ of segfaults.. Does someone have any clue as to what the below might be caused by? Isnt SIG11 usually

Dear All, I think I've hit a bug after migrating our mail server to the newest version of dovecot (version 2.2.15). When I try to list all imap folders for one user the imap process crashes. The listing to a specific folder (ex. INBOX) works fine, only the "*" crashes. Client side: --------------------- [root at mb log]# telnet 127.0.0.1 143 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to

Just wanted to note that you also need "mount" => 2.11 to use "auto" in fstab. On the homepage http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ it only tells you to use "util-linux" => 2.11 Also, a note about SILO not working with unclean Ext3 would be nice (i.e. make a dedicated ext2 /boot partition if you want to run ext3 on Sparc). /Martin (very new to this list)

Trying to learn Puppet, given a cfengine background. Am trying to understand the Puppet way of accomplishing the following: I have a lot of servers, that are organized into clusters (we call them silos). Each silo has a specific set of parameters (like IP addresses). I''d like to organize the silo information in some way that each server is associated with that information, and can

I upgrade from 2.2.3 -> 2.2.7a using the debian packages. Now, i have a big problem. Mapping drive: Ok Accessing the drive: Ok Trying to access a folder a popup emerges saying saying silo-1 on 'cookiemonster' (S:) S:\data is not accessible. Incorrect function. OK i see no errors in the logs, and am really stumped... reading a _file_ in the share works as expected tho. Creating a

Looking at Puppet for a new installation. Wondering about the following capability: Say I have a reference to some definition, where I call out a relationship: silo( webservers => "server1", databaseservers => "server2" ); (sorry if syntax is incorrect). Is it possible for the definition of this to trigger "server1" to be in a "webservers"

FreeBSD wahoo.prodigy.net 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Sep 23 10:13:51 CDT 2003 jbryant@wahoo.prodigy.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WAHOO.SMP i386 Dual Pentium II 333 MHz on Tyan Thunder-2 Motherboard. Anyone else seeing this? jim -- "Religious fundamentalism is the biggest threat to international security that exists today." United Nations Secretary

Linux libc5.4.33''s mk[s]temp() functions require 6 X''s at the end of a filename (the BSD versions I''ve seen are a bit more flexible). This alone is enough to break any claims to real BSD compatability, but wait, there''s more: Only 1 of those 6 X''s are really unique. The rest are simply pid. So you can create exactly 62 temp files using mk[s]temp()

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES