search for: silo

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my p...

...ready picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > > Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy > management on a Windows-DC. > On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have > to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user > and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and > the host will be done at t...

...my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm > always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. > > On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > Talking to myself again ;-) > > > > Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy > > management on a Windows-DC. > > On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you > > have > > to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the > > user > > and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the u...

I was playing around again with Windows and when you add members to silos, or remove them, it should not set/unset assigned silo on the user. So I've got a new pull request in Draft state still where I remove that functionality, as well as add some new commands to samba-tool user command. It turned out to be easier to add sub commands to user, as edit user wasn&...

...lprep --function-level=2016 samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2016 --forest-level=2016 --------- I joined a Windows 10 client. I can start ADUC sites-and-services DNS-manager from RSAT. But if I try to start "Active Directory Administrativ Center" to manage auth-policies and silos I getting the message: -------- It's not possible to get a connection to any domain -------- So even if I had switch to FL 2016 I still can't manage auth-policies and silos via Windows RSAT? Or did I forget something?

...esn''t require a boot floppy, or boot CD-ROM, or anything else of the like. Linux booted from LILO is not vulnerable, because bootable kernels must be specified ahead of time in /etc/lilo.conf, and I truly hope that no Linux system has a publicly writable /etc/lilo.conf. Linux booted from SILO _is_ vulnerable unless a boot password is specified in /etc/silo.conf, because SILO will otherwise allow the person at console to specify any arbitrary file from which to boot, just as the BSD bootloader does. With the boot password specified in /etc/silo.conf, SILO will require the user at consol...

I looked around a little bit, but as far as I can see, at the moment it's not possible to use auth-policies and silos with Samba-DCs only. So I need at least one Windows DC :-( Am 19.10.23 um 11:48 schrieb Stefan Kania via samba: > Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and > silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I > can only create, de...

Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I can only create, delete, list and view policies and silos Am 19.10.23 um 09:03 schrieb Daniel M?ller via samba: > Hello, > > You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented....

...aniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stefan Kania via samba [mailto:samba at lists.samba.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2023 17:43 An: Samba List <samba at lists.samba.org> Betreff: [Samba] Question about silos and Authentication policies I just installed Samba 4.19.1 (Sernet-packages). Here is my smb.conf on my DC ----------------- # Global parameters [global] ad dc functional level = 2016 netbios name = ADDC-01 realm = EXAMPLE.NET server role = active directory doma...

Am 27.10.23 um 02:32 schrieb Rob van der Linde via samba: > The missing functionality is --silo and --policy on modify user, and > probably also create user commands. That's exacly right, that's also the way Windows is handling this.

...ess since the first 3.0 Samba i have been getting a _lot_ of segfaults.. Does someone have any clue as to what the below might be caused by? Isnt SIG11 usually an indication of bad memory? The system has passed every memory diag tool i have tossed at it. fozzie (192.168.0.120) connect to service silo-1 initially as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=1001) (pid 12271) [2004/02/12 20:46:33, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) =============================================================== [2004/02/12 20:46:33, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 12271 (3.0.1-Debian) Please...

...8 M auth_username_chars = auth_username_format = %Ln deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: Subject=%s, From=%f, Physical Size=%p, Virtual Size=%w, %$ disable_plaintext_auth = no imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep tb-lsub-flags login_greeting = __mb__ ready mail_attachment_dir = /SILO/attachments mail_attachment_fs = sis posix:mode=660 mail_cache_min_mail_count = 10 mail_gid = mailuser mail_home = /SILO/homes/%Ln mail_location = mdbox:/SILO/mailboxes/%Ln/mdbox:INDEX=/SILO/indexes/%Ln mail_plugins = " zlib" mail_uid = mailuser mailbox_list_index = yes managesieve_notify...

Just wanted to note that you also need "mount" => 2.11 to use "auto" in fstab. On the homepage http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ it only tells you to use "util-linux" => 2.11 Also, a note about SILO not working with unclean Ext3 would be nice (i.e. make a dedicated ext2 /boot partition if you want to run ext3 on Sparc). /Martin (very new to this list)

Trying to learn Puppet, given a cfengine background. Am trying to understand the Puppet way of accomplishing the following: I have a lot of servers, that are organized into clusters (we call them silos). Each silo has a specific set of parameters (like IP addresses). I''d like to organize the silo information in some way that each server is associated with that information, and can use variable settings in templates. So, I was trying something like the following (which I know is wron...

I upgrade from 2.2.3 -> 2.2.7a using the debian packages. Now, i have a big problem. Mapping drive: Ok Accessing the drive: Ok Trying to access a folder a popup emerges saying saying silo-1 on 'cookiemonster' (S:) S:\data is not accessible. Incorrect function. OK i see no errors in the logs, and am really stumped... reading a _file_ in the share works as expected tho. Creating a new folder yields silo-1 on 'cookiemonster' (S:) Unable to create the folder 'Ne...

Looking at Puppet for a new installation. Wondering about the following capability: Say I have a reference to some definition, where I call out a relationship: silo( webservers => "server1", databaseservers => "server2" ); (sorry if syntax is incorrect). Is it possible for the definition of this to trigger "server1" to be in a "webservers" class and invoke webserver "appropriate" things, and "serv...

FreeBSD wahoo.prodigy.net 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Sep 23 10:13:51 CDT 2003 jbryant@wahoo.prodigy.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WAHOO.SMP i386 Dual Pentium II 333 MHz on Tyan Thunder-2 Motherboard. Anyone else seeing this? jim -- "Religious fundamentalism is the biggest threat to international security that exists today." United Nations Secretary

...esn''t require a boot floppy, or boot CD-ROM, or anything else of the like. Linux booted from LILO is not vulnerable, because bootable kernels must be specified ahead of time in /etc/lilo.conf, and I truly hope that no Linux system has a publicly writable /etc/lilo.conf. Linux booted from SILO _is_ vulnerable unless a boot password is specified in /etc/silo.conf, because SILO will otherwise allow the person at console to specify any arbitrary file from which to boot, just as the BSD bootloader does. With the boot password specified in /etc/silo.conf, SILO will require the user at consol...

...Functional Level 2008R2 by default, Samba as an AD DC will now, in provision ensure that the blank database is already prepared for Functional Level 2016, with AD Schema 2019. This preparation is of the default objects in the database, adding containers for Authentication Policies, Authentication Silos and AD claims in particular.? These DB objects must be updated to allow operation of the new features found in higher functional levels. Kerberos Claims, Authentication Silos and NTLM authentication policies ---------------------------------------------------------------------- An initial, parti...

...Functional Level 2008R2 by default, Samba as an AD DC will now, in provision ensure that the blank database is already prepared for Functional Level 2016, with AD Schema 2019. This preparation is of the default objects in the database, adding containers for Authentication Policies, Authentication Silos and AD claims in particular.? These DB objects must be updated to allow operation of the new features found in higher functional levels. Kerberos Claims, Authentication Silos and NTLM authentication policies ---------------------------------------------------------------------- An initial, parti...