search for: silk_memcpi

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "silk_memcpi".

Did you mean: silk_memcpy
2016 Jul 06
1
opus Digest, Vol 90, Issue 4
> I don't believe this is an actual error. If it's truly possible for > these areas to overlap (I don't think it is), then something much more > serious than using memmove instead of memcpy needs to be done about it. In the C# version of this code, these two copy regions are stored in separate arrays entirely. I agree that there should be no normal way to have the memcpy
2016 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] SILK: use silk_memmove for potentially overlapping areas
Fixes CID 1227580 --- silk/process_NLSFs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/silk/process_NLSFs.c b/silk/process_NLSFs.c index c27cf03..d9123ef 100644 --- a/silk/process_NLSFs.c +++ b/silk/process_NLSFs.c @@ -100,6 +100,6 @@ void silk_process_NLSFs( } else { /* Copy LPC coefficients for first half from second half */ - silk_memcpy(
2016 Aug 23
0
[PATCH 8/8] Optimize silk_NSQ_del_dec() for ARM NEON
Created corresponding unit test, and the optimization is bit exact with C function. This optimization speeds up SILK encoder on NEON as following. Fixed-point: Complexity 0-5: 0% Complexity 6-7: 6% Complexity 8-9: 10% Complexity 10: 8% Got similar results on floating-point. --- silk/NSQ_del_dec.c | 6 +- silk/SigProc_FIX.h | 4
2016 Aug 23
2
[PATCH 7/8] Update NSQ_LPC_BUF_LENGTH macro.
NSQ_LPC_BUF_LENGTH is independent of DECISION_DELAY. --- silk/define.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/silk/define.h b/silk/define.h index 781cfdc..1286048 100644 --- a/silk/define.h +++ b/silk/define.h @@ -173,11 +173,7 @@ extern "C" #define MAX_MATRIX_SIZE MAX_LPC_ORDER /* Max of LPC Order and LTP order */ -#if( MAX_LPC_ORDER >
2016 Jul 14
6
Several patches of ARM NEON optimization
I rebased my previous 3 patches to the current master with minor changes. Patches 1 to 3 replace all my previous submitted patches. Patches 4 and 5 are new. Thanks, Linfeng Zhang