search for: signatur

Hi, I am trying to setup the antispam plugin using the direct dspam backend. I have set antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature in dovecot.conf and in all mails I have signature lines like X-DSPAM-Signature: 1,49084a24139132188715614 but still, if I try to move a mail into the spam folder, i get the IMAP error message "antispam signature not found". I thought it might have to do with perm...

...le files but rather parts of files. Sadly, this functionality is not actually present in the rsync program. I'd like to explore adding this ability. There are basically three things that need to be done to enable efficient (partial-file) incremental tape backups, namely: 1) Generation of rsync signatures from existing files. 2) Generation of a binary patch from existing files + an rsync signature. 3) Application of a binary patch to existing files. Rsync already has the facility to generate and apply binary patches -- namely, batch-mode operation. Thus all that remains to be added is read and wr...

...>> > >> >> Using: >> >> >> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> >> at <- c(12,4,3,2) >> >> str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) >> >> ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") >> >> cc <- 0L >> >> trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ >> >> cc <<- cc + 1L >> >> print(cc) >> >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >> >&g...

I run checks with R-devel rev. 76756 on several of my packages which use S4, with no ill effects. With the risk of not adding much, it seems that Martin's example, which I repeat below, suggests a crossover between several "signatures" involved here - the signature of the generic, the signature of the method (the argument for setMethod()), and the signature of the function object defining the method. >> r2 <- oligoFn(object=diag(2), target=array(42)) > Error in .local(object, target) : &g...

...nrik Bengtsson >>>>>> on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:00:39 -0700 writes: > >> Using: >> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> at <- c(12,4,3,2) >> str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) >> ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") >> cc <- 0L >> trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ >> cc <<- cc + 1L >> print(cc) >> if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> trace(methods::conformMethod...

Dear List, I'm struggling with the signature writing cbind/rbind functions for a S4 class. First of all, I'm very happy that it is now possible to dispatch on ... I follow the example for "paste" in ?dotMethods, which works as far as this: ### start example setClass ("cbtest", representation = representat...

after this setClass("A") setGeneric("bar", function(x, y) standardGeneric("bar")) setMethod(bar, signature(x="A", y="A"), function(x, y) {}) setMethod(bar, signature(x="A", y="ANY"), function(x, y) {}) the method for signature c("A", "A") contains package information > str(getMethod(bar, c("A", "A"))) Formal class...

Hello, Is the signature-log backend of the antispam plugin broken when compiling with dovecot version 1.1.2? I'm using version 1.0 of the antispam plugin. It looks like there isn't anything more recent. cc -c -DCONFIG_DEBUG -DDEBUG_SYSLOG -fPIC -shared -Wall -Wextra -DPLUGINNAME=antispam -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../do...

Using: untrace(methods::conformMethod) at <- c(12,4,3,2) str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") cc <- 0L trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ cc <<- cc + 1L print(cc) if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified untrace(methods::conformMethod) trace(methods::conformMethod, at = list(at), tracer = quote({ str(list(signature...

With the new signature file I was able to verify, but there was still a bad signature: "gpg: key 0x0FC3042E345AD05D: 1 bad signature" which I highlighted below. Didn't seem to be a problem, but thought I'd point it out. I'd be glad to do additional tests if you'd like. $ gpg --list-keys /home/...

Henrik, If a minimal reprex is hard to construct, could you perhaps instrument your version of R to include a browser() call at the start of the else if(!all(signature[omittedSig] == "missing")) { branch, run the code that triggers the issue for you (and must hit that branch) and tell us what the "signature" and "omittedSig" objects look like at that point? Bonus points for figuring out why it is needed to use numerical indexing...

...the code base or if its a 64 bit memory issue. When i try to move a message into or out of the spam folder, it fails, and with debugging on, there are strange entries in the syslog. Added a few more debugging statements, and I get the following showing up: Apr 11 00:04:41 uberserver imap: found signature 443b336a271581061887518 Apr 11 00:04:41 uberserver imap: working with signature (<E4>Z Apr 11 00:04:41 uberserver imap: in call dspam Apr 11 00:04:41 uberserver imap: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --stdout - --class=spam --signature=(<E4>Z Apr 11 00:04:41 uberserver dspam[1361]: Unable...

...10102) *27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.434 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure* 27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.444 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.219 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no valid signature found 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.714 dnssec: info:?? validating ./SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.957 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no valid signature found named needs some 1 hour to be really active. The named.log shows: ..... 7-Dec-2019 23:36:2...

Full_Name: Tim Keitt Version: 1.5 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (128.227.201.237) The function "setMethod" makes the following call to "insertMethod": allMethods <- insertMethod(allMethods, signature, fnames[1:length(signature)], asMethodDefinition(definition, signature)) If I understand insertMethod correctly, the third argument should be the names of the formal arguments of the method. However, this fails if the signature is something like "c('x', 'i', 'j...

There seems to be a bug arising when using multiple S4 generics with "..." as the signature. The following code works as expected: ############################################################## > setGeneric("rbind", function(..., deparse.level=1) standardGeneric("rbind"), + signature = "...") Creating a generic for "rbind" in packa...

Hi. It looks like the gpg signatures of the RC2 and RC3 tarballs are bogus... I've tested the .bz2 and .tar.gz files downloaded from the us1 and us4 mirrors. To confirm that it's not a local problem, I've tested the signature of the Samba_CA.crt file (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/) and it's ok. Can someone else p...

While trying to install a package, I received this error ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in matchSignature(signature, fdef, where) : more elements in the method signature (2) than in the generic signature (1) A more helpful variant is Error in matchSignature(signature, fdef, where) : more elements in the method signature (2) than in the generic signature (1) for function 'sort' which...

Hi, #tcsh#machine# gpg --verify openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz.asc openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Wed May 25 08:26:24 2005 EDT using DSA key ID 86FF9C48 gpg: BAD signature from "Damien Miller (Personal Key) <djm at mindrot.org>" I made sure that I had the same key loaded that the signature was made with, but that didn't change the error. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew...

...1.0.9-16.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-16.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-16.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-16.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm src: seamonkey-1.0.9-16.el4.centos.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080420/fa93d497/signature-0001.bin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:01:25 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <joh...

In 'conformMethod', there is another instance of omittedSig & <something about signature[omittedSig]> . It just affects error message. Original: ? ? if(any(is.na(match(signature[omittedSig], c("ANY", "missing"))))) { ? ? ? ? bad <- omittedSig & is.na(match(signature[omittedSig], c("ANY", "missing"))) After r76756: ? ? if(any(iiN <...