search for: signal100

On 19/07/2018 15:57, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > <rant> > As far as google anything goes, not everybody volunteers one's > information into paws of google (and quite likely one or more of 3 > letter agencies collecting information that way). I know (call it > educated guess) that about 70% of messages I send are ending up in > google databases whether I want it or not.

..."Keith Keller" <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:33:17 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers? > On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> >> Well said. I feel that too many people today have forgotten (or, more >> likely, never learned) these lessons from history. People give away >> their personal and supposedly private information too easily and, I feel >> certain, will come to regret...

On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice Try doing without launchd on macOS. If you think that?s irrelevant, count the number of MacBooks at the next FreeBSD conference you attend. For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the defau...

On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > Well said. I feel that too many people today have forgotten (or, more > likely, never learned) these lessons from history. People give away > their personal and supposedly private information too easily and, I feel > certain, will come to regret it (some already ha...

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:46 PM Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. > > I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these > people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of > mo...

On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly prohibited to redistribute them. For the sake of completeness, not everyone with legitimate access to RHEL binaries is necessarily a *paid* customer. Red Hat provides a free dev licence so anyone can legitimately access RHEL binaries (and source RPMs of course) for free,

...uot; <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> >> To: centos at centos.org >> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:33:17 AM >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers? > >> On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >>> >>> Well said. I feel that too many people today have forgotten (or, more >>> likely, never learned) these lessons from history. People give away >>> their personal and supposedly private information too easily and, I feel >>> certain,...

On 17/10/18 1:25 am, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > That said, if one is strongly willing to stay away from systemd, and > not to such extent into Linux as to needing an advise on that, I would > recommend to take a look at non-Linux system, specifically BSD > descendants (FreeBSD, NetBSD, etc). Their kernel is not as heavy > (big,resource demanding) as Linux kernel, and you can do

On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > On 17/10/2018 20:03, Warren Young wrote: >> On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >>> launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice >> Try doing without launchd on macOS. > > If l...

On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of money to tend systems over new year's eve/day. I was working for an ISP at the time and got none of this. Nothing happened. I don't even recall

On 10/17/18 7:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 17, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> >> On 17/10/2018 20:03, Warren Young wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >>>> launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice >>> Try doing without launchd on mac...

On 17/10/2018 20:03, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice > Try doing without launchd on macOS. > > If you think that?s irrelevant, count the number of MacBooks at the next FreeBSD conference you attend. That's Mac. It's not Linux. And that's the po...

On 30/10/2018 06:46, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! >> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a

On 30/10/2018 14:49, mark wrote: > I wouldn't expect a system 1, if that's the current name AS/400 -> eServer iSeries -> System i -> Power Systems RS/6000 -> eServer pSeries -> System p -> Power Systems So the current 'Power Systems' range combines what was AS/400 with what was RS/6000. They all use Power CPUs now and run Linux, IBM i, or AIX. "IBM

On 30/10/2018 14:40, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 30/10/2018 06:46, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>>> POWER >>>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>>>> hardware >>>>>

On 30/10/2018 16:40, mark wrote: > Linux was IBM's silver > bullet on a free platter. I mean, *how* many operatings systems do you > want to support...? Yup, it must cost them a pretty penny to maintain all those proprietary operating systems (especially when you include their mainframe ones). I suspect that Linux will eventually replace i and AIX -- eventually. But I bet there are

On 30/10/2018 17:14, Simon Matter wrote: > Are you sure, has this changed? In the past time when I had to do with > iSeries, they even had their own rack size, no chance to put them into a > standard server rack. Ah, I must admit that I didn't look at rack sizes. > I agree the Power System L922 looks promising, but I'm afraid the "Please > contact us for pricing"

On 22/11/2018 21:44, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> Am 22.11.2018 um 22:41 schrieb Frank <frank at sauerburger.com>: >> >> Is it only me or are the talks not public on YouTube. When I open the >> link, it says "Private Video" for every entry in the playlist. > > Nope. > > Probably need an account. > Which I don?t have. Do you mean Youtube

Noel, On 21/04/2020 13:40, Noel Power via samba wrote: > yes and no, there is an initial separation layer built into the server > implementation, currently only one concrete implementation > (tracker/sparql). Part of the rational to try use elasticsearch was to > really see if the separation layer is workable/suitable and to more > clearly identify parts of the code that could be

On 21/04/2020 12:38, Noel Power via samba wrote: > (resending, apologies if you got it already but I got a rejection message) This one got through on the Samba list. Thank you for your helpful reply. > yep, WSP server that translates protocol to tracker sparql queries is > working (with caveats [1]) > > The code would need some effort to get it in shape, as you might imagine >