search for: sig_term

...EWDC /user MYDOM\Me" in the same place, I get "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable." This is after a fresh restart of Samba. log.samba says (starting at last restart): samba: using 'standard' process model [2013/09/21 20:01:30.191185, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) [2013/09/21 20:01:30.191208, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) [2013/09/21 20:01:30.191223, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) [2013/09/21 20:01:30.191223, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 30885 on SIGTERM Exiting pid 30882 on SIGTERM [2013/09/21 20:01:...

...icensing Manager tool. Would this keep me from joining the Samba domain on this server? I'm going to pursue resolving it regardless. I've also checked all the Samba logs I can find, and the only error I see is the following: [2015/04/17 14:59:31.114933, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 4528 on SIGTERM [2015/04/17 14:59:31.118968, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) [2015/04/17 14:59:31.122492, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:116(sig_term) SIGTERM: killing children [2015/04/17 14:59:31.125133, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 4514 on...

Hi all, I've been running Samba 4.1.6 in production for 2 weeks now and it's been great. However I noticed a huge security flaw today that I hit only once. I access Samba4 shares over the VPN that is irrelevant since the security access is user-based, not IP based. What happens right after the connection, Windows tries to read the shares and some are empty, but they are not supposed to

...kcc_periodic.c:693: Failed samba_kcc - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [2018/12/22 19:31:48.283948, 0] ../source4/smbd/process_standard.c:86(sigterm_signal_handler) Exiting pid 391 on SIGTERM [... error above repeats about 10 times ...] [2018/12/22 19:31:48.446449, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:131(sig_term) SIGTERM: killing children [2018/12/22 19:31:48.447387, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:131(sig_term) SIGTERM: killing children [2018/12/22 19:31:48.447428, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:135(sig_term) Exiting pid 367 on SIGTERM [2018/12/22 19:31:48.464044, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:135(sig_ter...

We have a Samba4 AD DC running on an Ubuntu 14.04 VM [ smb.conf ] # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MEADORANDCO realm = meadorandco.com netbios name = SOGO server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 192.168.121.1 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes passdb backend = samba allow dns updates = nonsecure

...> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED > [2018/12/22 19:31:48.283948, 0] > ../source4/smbd/process_standard.c:86(sigterm_signal_handler) > Exiting pid 391 on SIGTERM > > [... error above repeats about 10 times ...] > > [2018/12/22 19:31:48.446449, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:131(sig_term) > SIGTERM: killing children > [2018/12/22 19:31:48.447387, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:131(sig_term) > SIGTERM: killing children > [2018/12/22 19:31:48.447428, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:135(sig_term) > Exiting pid 367 on SIGTERM > [2018/12/22 19:31:48.464044, 0] ../sou...

...ting "GENSEC/AUTH/NTVFS backend registered" lines, and then samba suddenly seems to start AGAIN..: > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.682194, 3] ../source4/param/share.c:124(share_register) > SHARE backend [ldb] registered. > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.710416, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:116(sig_term) > SIGTERM: killing children > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.711006, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) > Exiting pid 5802 on SIGTERM > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.871830, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:370(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.2.5-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy started. > Co...

I was too quick to send my previous email. It can't really be a problem of the package since I have, as mentioned, another system with the exact same setup and the exact same package versions and it all works there... On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 11:18, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Yes, I tried running dbcheck (see first email), it showed 0 errors from > the start, I

...backend registered" > lines, and then samba suddenly seems to start AGAIN..: > > > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.682194, 3] > ../source4/param/share.c:124(share_register) > > SHARE backend [ldb] registered. > > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.710416, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:116(sig_term) > > SIGTERM: killing children > > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.711006, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) > > Exiting pid 5802 on SIGTERM > > [2015/11/11 06:25:07.871830, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c:370(binary_smbd_main) > > samba version 4.2.5-SerNet-Debi...

Hello Everybody, it happens that my Rails 1.2.5 application developed in Linux environment starts DHCP service (version 3.0.1-r1 taken from www.isc.org/products/DHCP). After that the process run in his turn by the service (dhcpd) cannot be normally stopped using signal 15 (TERM). It is really worth to notice that using rails 1.1.0 the issue was not present. Thanks in advance for any solution,

...5:16:00.329503, 3] ../source4/param/share.c:124(share_register) SHARE backend [ldb] registered. It sits here until it goes into uninterruptible sleep state. Then if I kill samba processes, the log.samba will return the following: [2016/06/23 15:17:50.595410, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:116(sig_term) SIGTERM: killing children [2016/06/23 15:17:50.595729, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 2544 on SIGTERM [2016/06/23 15:17:50.599791, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:72(ldb_wrap_debug) ldb: A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x7f324e9679b0] on /usr/local/samba...

Hello there, I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 and dc2. Distribution: Debian 8.5 Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH". Because the message "BAD_NETPATH" I checked the DNS-resolution:

.../log.samba: ===================== .....dns update failed [2016/08/19 14:47:31.646907, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT [2016/08/19 14:48:59.829660, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 24381 on SIGTERM [2016/08/19 14:50:59.870435, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 24417 on SIGTERM [2016/08/19 14:52:59.898571, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) Exiting pid 24434 on SIGTERM [2016/08/19 14:56:16.929109, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/co...

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:13 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you simply try to modify type=forking to type=notify and test again? > Perhaps your old has disappeared (they do sometimes, not often enough)... Seems to work for starting smbd and nmbd (although Type=forking has been running flawlessly for many months) on my Gentoo system. In my Debian LXC

...internalsite username = guest read only = No guest ok = Yes SAMBA seemed pretty easy when I first set it up. Basically configure smb.conf then run /usr/sbin/smbd then /usr/sbin/nmbd. But I'm lost now ... Here are log.nmbd .... [2003/09/19 15:59:53, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65) Got SIGTERM: going down... [2003/09/19 16:00:30, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(798) standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option [2003/09/19 16:13:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65) Got SIGTERM: going down... [2003/09/19 16:25:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(405) *****...

Hi! Just another question... I've an Samba-PDC (2.2.5 --with-ldapsam) - and of course a BDC (at least I hope that I get this running soon) with an LDAP-backend (users/machins/groups). If I want to create something like a "Subdomain" with some - but not all - of the LDAP-users, can this be done, and if how? for example if we have a domain EDU (for educational users - students

...re.c:124(share_register) > > SHARE backend [ldb] registered. > > > It sits here until it goes into uninterruptible sleep state. Then if I > kill samba processes, the log.samba will return the following: > > > [2016/06/23 15:17:50.595410, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:116(sig_term) > SIGTERM: killing children > [2016/06/23 15:17:50.595729, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) > Exiting pid 2544 on SIGTERM > [2016/06/23 15:17:50.599791, 0] > ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:72(ldb_wrap_debug) > ldb: A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x7f3...

...2/10/28 08:32:28, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.110: code = 0x12 [2002/10/28 08:34:02, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.109: code = 0x0 [2002/10/28 08:34:34, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(63) Got SIGTERM: going down... tail smbd.log [2002/10/21 21:30:57, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to [2002/10/21 21:30:57, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(492) Server exit (caught signal) [2002/10/27 06:25:34, 0] smbd/server.c:sig_hup(384) Got SIGHUP [2002/10...

...ng pid 3015 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3014 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3023 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3018 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3025 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3020 on SIGTERM > Exiting pid 3028 on SIGTERM > [2017/03/10 16:03:22.478704, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:121(sig_term) > Exiting pid 3019 on SIGTERM > [2017/03/10 16:03:25.843803, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015 > [2017/03/10 16:03:26.642925, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c...

...failure: if I take out the new entry, it's OK, and if I put it back in, the same clients that failed before will fail again. The smbclient that was able to connect is from a 2.0.0 samba on a Solaris 2.6 sparc box. The logs are unremarkable: # tail log.nmb [1999/12/11 10:28:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(67) Got SIGTERM: going down... [1999/12/11 10:28:44, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(747) Netbios nameserver version 2.0.6 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998 [1999/12/11 10:31:09, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(67) Got SIGTERM: going down... [1999/12/11 10:31:10, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(747) Netbios n...