search for: shumaker

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 37 matches for "shumaker".

2006 Jan 16
10
Multi-path routing only using last nexthop in default route.
I''ve applied julian''s paches to a 2.6.14 gentoo kernel with the appropiate options enabled, and i''m using a modified version of the mpath2.sh script also available on julian''s site http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ Overall everything works nearly perfectly. Incomming connections to either the fios (PPPoE) connection, or cable modem get routed back out correctly. The
2006 Mar 15
5
Fix list so it adds Reply-To: header
Could whomever is in charge of the lartc mailing list please change it to add the header: Reply-To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Every other list I''m on is setup so that by default replies will go to the list. When replying to lartc emails I notice myself and others constantly forgetting this list does not behave like the rest, and that we have to either do a reply-to-all, or manually enter in
2005 Dec 27
5
class exceeds its ceil
Hi, I have a setup like this: class 1:1 rate 7600kbit (on a imq device) | |\class 1:10 rate 100kbit ceil 5600kbit prio 7 (here goes p2p traffic) \class 1:12 rate 7500kbit ceil 7600kbit | |\class 1:121 rate 3100 ceil 7500kbit prio 0 |\class 1:122 rate 2200 ceil 7500kbit prio 2 \class 1:123 rate 2200 ceil 7500kbit prio
2005 Jul 15
6
Problems setting up nested qdisc, feedback to LARTC HOWTO
Hi all, based on the information in the "Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO", I was trying to set up traffic shaping on my firewall. While I found the HOWTO very useful, in the process I ran into some problems that I did not forsee: According to the HOWTO it seems that it should have worked, even after spending some time going through the sections looking for answers,
2009 Dec 14
4
[LLVMdev] inttoptr weirdness
Hi again. I have a complex type system in my custom language that isn't easily representable as LLVM IR types, so I figured I could mostly get along with treating my types as i8* and doing the appropriate bitcasts and inttoptr instructions, and doing pointer arithmetic myself (by casting the pointers to ints, adding the appropriate byte offsets, and then casting back to pointers). However,
2009 Dec 12
1
[LLVMdev] stack usage and scoping
...ace, since it doesn't know the extend of a stack >> variable. > This is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3361 > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > -- --------------------- Scott Shumaker CTO, magnifeast.com Online ordering from hundreds of LA delivery and carryout restaurants
2005 Dec 14
3
exact rate
Hello I am using htb (krenel 2.6.14.3 + esfq patch from fatooh.org) to limit the bandwidth. But I want the absolute maximum rate to be for example 5Mbit and not to exceed it. here is the script: $tc qdisc add dev ${NETIF} root handle 1 htb r2q 4 $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1: classid 1:21 htb rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1:21 classid 1:101 htb rate 2Mbit ceil
2005 Nov 03
6
Cannot get htb & prio working together.
Hi, I''ve failed miserably in my endeavours so far and I''m at the point where help would be much appreciated. I want to have 3 bandwidth limited classes on my Internet interface. In each of those classes I want 3 prioritization bands, and then use "tc filters" to place the traffic into the correct class and priority. The problem is that the traffic
2006 May 10
11
HTB at 100+ Mbits/sec
Hello all, I''ve been trying to test HTB performance for different link bandwidths to find potential limits and this is what I have so far: http://home.comcast.net/~msethuraman/htbtest/ Can members please go over the setup, test procedure and the results and answer a few questions? 1. Is the testing methodology okay and can the results be considered accurate? If so, is this a decent
2005 Dec 18
3
connection tracking
Hello I have some rules inserted in the NAT table dual SNAT and DNAT for a connection They use at some moment the same port of the outside network. The problem i have is that the connection tracking in the kernel checks first the oldest rule and then the newest one. I use a system based on ARM XScale processor. Is that the default behaviour and how can i change this behaviour? Marius
2005 May 25
2
external and internal LANs
hi all what does it mean if the total network speed on internal LAN is greater than the external LAN and why it happens? the extrnal LAN here is the Intenet using a dedicated bandwidth. and BTW the linux box NATting has no shapping at all. just direct piping
2005 Nov 02
4
must cut the line down too much for shaping to work
Hi, my situation: One internet connection 256 kbps uplink/downlink, pretty stable speed, a Linux router with three NICs (one to ISP, one to DMZ and one with VLANs enabled to our LAN). Each of three VLANs (1, 10, 11) is a region for me; id 1 gets guaranteed 128 kbps, id 10 and 11 both get guaranteed 64 kbps (both uplink and downlink). Simple configuration. After I read relevant parts of lartc
2006 May 11
9
HFSC and prioritization
I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However, I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do: Eth1 -> HFSC ........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536
2006 Jan 10
8
tc filter add ... fw returns RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
When I run this: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw I get: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument The traditional interpretation of that gnarly error message is that cls_fw is missing, but lsmod | grep cls_fw gets me: cls_fw 2336 4 (autoclean) I can''t remove it because it''s in use, but all 4 statements that use it failed, so
2009 Dec 11
0
[LLVMdev] stack usage and scoping
Hello, Scott > I've just started using LLVM for a project I'm working on, and the > docs seem to encourage the use of alloca, with the expectation that > various optimization passes will optimize away unnecessary stack > pressure.  However, I can't seem to figure out how LLVM can properly > re-use stack space, since it doesn't know the extend of a stack >
2004 Nov 18
1
Rsync Hangs when syncing two Windows Drives Locally..?
I am trying to keep two hard drives mirrored on a local machine. They are both 120 GB and I want to run rsync 3 times a day. I don't have an rsync server running and am only using the rsync.exe with a current cygwin1.dll. the command I use to sync the drives is: rsync -vvva --delete /cygdrive/d /cygdrive/e What do you guys think is the issue here? The command will start and I will see
2005 Oct 19
1
[LLVMdev] Internalize or build broken?
I also updated the code and did a clean build with VS. I get the following error: \llvm\include\llvm\Transforms\LinkAllPasses.h(79) : error C2660: 'llvm::createInternalizePass' : function does not take 0 arguments Is this also related? Wayne At 02:45 PM 10/18/2005, you wrote: >On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: >>I just updated my tree, and when I do a clean
2005 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] missing llabs define in VS: DAGCombiner.cpp
grumble, grumble, MS does not have llabs() llabs() is not defined in Visual Studio, however, _abs64() is. But if I switch to _abs64() the linker does not resolve __abs64(). I thought _abs64() was suppose to be in the CRT library. Any hints for a solution? c:\devwl\llvm\lib\CodeGen\SelectionDAG\DAGCombiner.cpp(295) : error C3861: 'llabs': identifier not found, even with argument-dependent
2005 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
I'm not sure how many people are using Visual Studio to build the llvm tools, other than myself? When I compile the llvm tools on linux I do not see any warnings (I believe -Wall is set?). However, under visual studio there are a lot of warnings, mostly of this form: warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from 'uint64_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data
2009 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] stack usage and scoping
I've just started using LLVM for a project I'm working on, and the docs seem to encourage the use of alloca, with the expectation that various optimization passes will optimize away unnecessary stack pressure. However, I can't seem to figure out how LLVM can properly re-use stack space, since it doesn't know the extend of a stack variable. In this simple C example: extern void