Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "shlibdep".
Did you mean:
shlibdeps
2007 Sep 07
0
Backporting Xen 3.1 to Etch
Hi,
this morining I was trying to compile xen 3.1 on my Debian Etch (AMD64).
I have a little problem with gcc-multilib. It depends on many packages
that don't exist in Etch. So I brutally remove it from debian/control
and then dpkg-buildpackage.
There was some warning on compilation:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized
d...
2013 Apr 04
1
Samba 4 Packaging Issues
...g/source/experimental/samba4)
> is my base package and the provided debian folder was my starting point. I
> didn't use the samba packages for Precise because they are woefully old.
> I've tried to modify the files to meet my needs but am currently hitting an
> error on dpkg-shlibdeps.
>
> It spits out a lot of warnings about not being able to extract the name and
> version from certain libraries, but it is actually erroring out because it
> can't find certain libraries.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libkrb5-samba4.so.26 needed by
&...
2013 Sep 06
1
Bug#721999: xen: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libxenstore.so.3.0 needed by debian/libxen-4.3/usr/lib/libxenlight-4.3.so (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: '/usr/lib')
Source: xen
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi
New uploaded xen 4.3.0-1 FTBFS, see [1] for build log for i386.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xen&arch=i386&ver=4.3.0-1&stamp=1378426577
Regards,
Salvatore
2013 Sep 09
0
Bug#721999: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libxenstore.so.3.0 needed by debian,/libxen-4.3/usr/lib/libxenlight-4.3.so (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '/usr,/lib')
Hi,
This is just a quick note that I receive effectively the same error when
doing an amd64 build.
A workaround is to install the binary package libxenstore3.0 but of
course the source build should not require an external install of one of
the packages that it builds.
James
2018 Jan 10
2
Xen packaging in Debian - Progress update
Hi all,
Thanks for sending this update Hans. I too am interested in helping out with xen packaging. I am trying to dig into the dpkg-shlibdeps issues - I built it successfully on one box but haven?t been able to reproduce. Either way, I will plan to hang around in IRC to help where I can.
Stephen
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Hans van Kranenburg <hans at knorrie.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/22/2017 02:01 AM, Ha...
2017 Dec 22
3
Xen packaging in Debian
To: Debian xen and kernel team list, Ian Jackson
Cc: Stefan Bader, maintainer of xen packages in Ubuntu
Hi all,
Short version: Hi! I'd like to help with the Xen packaging in Debian.
Long version:
Q: Who are you? How are you related to Debian an the Xen project?
A: Hi, I'm Hans van Kranenburg, nickname Knorrie, I live in the
Netherlands. I'm a Debian user since 2002, and have been
2009 Dec 15
5
HVM support to be removed from Debian Squeeze: call for volunteers
[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list]
Dear everyone,
Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that
is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't
want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support
for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:
2009 Dec 15
5
HVM support to be removed from Debian Squeeze: call for volunteers
[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list]
Dear everyone,
Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that
is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't
want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support
for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:
2002 May 25
2
mismatch against version of openssl, letter version brokeness
What risk exists in changing the check for the matching version of
openssl so that the final letter part of the version (e.g. 0.9.6c
vs. 0.9.6d) is ignored? Are there any security vulnerabilities in
such a thing? What if ssh(d) is linked against an older _letter_
version such as 0.9.6c and now finds the library is 0.9.6d? Is
there a security risk in that? Surely a major API change would not
2018 Oct 05
4
Entirely new Xen packaging
I have now finished totally rewriting the Xen package in Debian, from
scratch. Amazingly as soon as I got a package which was lintian-clean
and would install, it worked first time !
I have generated 18 patches to go upstream which I have sent to
xen-devel. There are two more, xenstore ABI patches, which need a bit
of tidying up.
There is still room for improvement but it is now clearly ready