search for: shlibdeps

Hi, this morining I was trying to compile xen 3.1 on my Debian Etch (AMD64). I have a little problem with gcc-multilib. It depends on many packages that don't exist in Etch. So I brutally remove it from debian/control and then dpkg-buildpackage. There was some warning on compilation: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized dp...

...g/source/experimental/samba4) > is my base package and the provided debian folder was my starting point. I > didn't use the samba packages for Precise because they are woefully old. > I've tried to modify the files to meet my needs but am currently hitting an > error on dpkg-shlibdeps. > > It spits out a lot of warnings about not being able to extract the name and > version from certain libraries, but it is actually erroring out because it > can't find certain libraries. > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libkrb5-samba4.so.26 needed by &g...

Source: xen Version: 4.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi New uploaded xen 4.3.0-1 FTBFS, see [1] for build log for i386. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xen&arch=i386&ver=4.3.0-1&stamp=1378426577 Regards, Salvatore

Hi, This is just a quick note that I receive effectively the same error when doing an amd64 build. A workaround is to install the binary package libxenstore3.0 but of course the source build should not require an external install of one of the packages that it builds. James

Hi all, Thanks for sending this update Hans. I too am interested in helping out with xen packaging. I am trying to dig into the dpkg-shlibdeps issues - I built it successfully on one box but haven?t been able to reproduce. Either way, I will plan to hang around in IRC to help where I can. Stephen > On Jan 9, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Hans van Kranenburg <hans at knorrie.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12/22/2017 02:01 AM, Han...

To: Debian xen and kernel team list, Ian Jackson Cc: Stefan Bader, maintainer of xen packages in Ubuntu Hi all, Short version: Hi! I'd like to help with the Xen packaging in Debian. Long version: Q: Who are you? How are you related to Debian an the Xen project? A: Hi, I'm Hans van Kranenburg, nickname Knorrie, I live in the Netherlands. I'm a Debian user since 2002, and have been

[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list] Dear everyone, Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:

[message cross posted to the pkg-xen and xen-devel list] Dear everyone, Bastian Blank - which is the person (among others, but mainly him) that is packaging Xen in Debian -, has decided last summer that he doesn't want to deal with the qemu-dm of Xen, thus removing Xen Qemu and support for HVM in Debian. Here is what he wrote:

What risk exists in changing the check for the matching version of openssl so that the final letter part of the version (e.g. 0.9.6c vs. 0.9.6d) is ignored? Are there any security vulnerabilities in such a thing? What if ssh(d) is linked against an older _letter_ version such as 0.9.6c and now finds the library is 0.9.6d? Is there a security risk in that? Surely a major API change would not

I have now finished totally rewriting the Xen package in Debian, from scratch. Amazingly as soon as I got a package which was lintian-clean and would install, it worked first time ! I have generated 18 patches to go upstream which I have sent to xen-devel. There are two more, xenstore ABI patches, which need a bit of tidying up. There is still room for improvement but it is now clearly ready