search for: ship

To accompany the Payment library (http://payment.rufy.com/), I have created the shipping library that connects APIs for various shippers like UPS and FedEx. It is available as a ruby gem: gem install shipping or from rubyforge http://rubyforge.org/projects/shipping There is going to be some data that will persist for all shipments. For example, you will not want to repeat the...

...turns out, this mostly works today (see CMake configuration below). The only missing pieces are that the shared object is not added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is this a build configuration you'd consider using? $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ -DANDROID=1 \ -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDir)/platforms/android-19/arch-arm \ -DCMAKE_CXX_FLA...

I am trying to use the shipping gem shipping.rubyforge.org, but I cant get it to work on my windows development box at all. Problem anytime I try to do anything I get: ArgumentError: couldn''t find HOME environment -- expanding `~/.shipping.yml'' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/shipping-1.3.0...

...1] everything broke when it tried to use that .la file, with millions of messages like this: /usr/bin/ld: error: /home/edwin/llvm2.7/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux/lib64/libstdc++.a(functexcept.o): requires unsupported dynamic reloc; recompile with -fPIC The problem is that there is no libstdc++.so shipped in llvm-gcc, but there is a .la and a .a file. It tries to use the .a file, buts its non-PIC. So I had to remove the .la and .a file, and put a symlink to the system's libstdc++.so.6. (simply removing the files was not enough: -lstdc++ was not found, simply putting the symlink wasn't en...

Hello, Edwin > I think its a mistake in the binary package: the .la and .a shouldn't be > shipped, and the .so should be built & shipped! This means that llvm-gcc was compiled in static mode (same problem, btw, is seen with debian packages - llvm-gcc they ship is pretty useless due to this). One should configure llvm-gcc w/o --disable-shared. And yes, both .so and .a should be shipped....

greetings, has anyone had luck with the UPS portion of the shipping gem? i get nil''s returned for price, wondering what i''m missing. to avoid all confusion i included the account/login in the instantiation (sub with real values). @ups = Shipping::UPS.new :ups_account => ''7B4F74E3075AEEFF'', :ups_user => ''us...

Hi LLVM’ers! We are hosting a BoF at this year's Dev Meeting on a subject we hope will be of interest to some (many?) of you: shipping software (entirely) as LLVM IR. You can find our proposal in the meeting schedule online: https://llvmdevelopersmeetingbay2016.sched.org/event/8Yzq/shipping-software-as-llvm-ir The BoF is scheduled to last 45 minutes, which will go by very quickly! To make the best use of the time, we'd...

I have a general question regarding smb.conf and I was hoping that some of the rather more knowledgeable and experienced people here could please comment please? I am currently setting my various SAMBA systems up via some shell-scripts. Within these scripts, I remove the stock smb.conf shipped with Samba and replace this with an empty smb.conf file to which I add my own configuration options afterwards. Obviously I COULD instead simply append my changes to the existing file. However currently i just remove the existing smb.conf and start again with a blank file because the altern...

I?m running a model on animal behavior in response to shipping. In most cases, there is only one ship in the study area at one time. Ship length, distance from the animals, speed, angle from animals, and ship direction (as east/west bound) are among shipping-related covariates (with multiple interactions). The tricky part is that sometimes there are 2 shi...

...ration >> below). The only missing pieces are that the shared object is not >> added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is >> this a build configuration you'd consider using? >> >> $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ >> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ >> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ >> -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ >> -DANDROID=1 \ >> -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ >> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDi...

Hi Mehdi, Yes, we did see your earlier post. Efficient (de)serialization is definitely important for both exporting (a la LTO and ThinLTO) and for shipping code as IR. I expect most use cases of the latter would benefit. -—Vikram // Vikram S. Adve // Professor, Department of Computer Science // University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign // vadve at illinois.edu<mailto:vadve at illinois.edu> // http://llvm.org On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:41 PM...

Hi I am late to the party. Here is my personal take of the topic: * Do you ship software as IR today? What lessons have you learned? Yes. We accept AppStore submission in bitcode (LLVM IR). The core function in clang is upstreamed and you can look up the related code path triggered by -fembed-bitcode option. * Challenges of shipping software as IR Compatibility: We are trying...

...ore that just “efficient (de)serialization” as there is some amount of tradeoff to make between “size” vs “speed” vs “flexibility” (which are all some sort of “efficient”). For instance what if we get a faster deserialization but got larger size? That might be an issue for some people who’d like to ship bitcode. Another thing is that we may get better speed/size by optimizing for the “streaming” case but losing the flexibility of loading only a subpart of the bitcode. This is where I’d be interested (and I’ll pay attention) during the BoF to hear about all the use cases folks are envisioning. —...

Some people on this group may have understood from messages posted here that the Sipura SPA-2000 is not currently available for shipping. That is not the case. Voxilla.com has the Sipura SPA-2000 available for immediate shipping, and has had them since late November. The price is $109.95, and it comes with a month of free VoicePulse service with activation fees waived (a $65 value). In return for the tremendous help that th...

...to go under and pull the plug when they get into financial trouble(not being able to pay the bills) and run with the customers money. I have had this happen to me on 2 occasions. Just the woes of doing business on the net. Being in Canada it makes it very difficult to find companies that will ship COD from the US. If I was to order I would only order COD from now on from VoipSupply. I have ordered product from VoipSupply and received the product. I will not be ordering more product do to this outage of the phones with no explanation. Just my 2cents. -------------- next...

...g pieces are that the shared object is not >>>> added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is >>>> this a build configuration you'd consider using? >>>> >>>> $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ >>>> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ >>>> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ >>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ >>>> -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ >>>> -DANDROID=1 \ >>>> -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ >&g...

Russell Wallace wrote: > One issue I've been looking at with regard to using LLVM as a compiler > backend is distribution of programs, particularly on Linux where > different distributions have different binary package formats and it > is usual to ship programs as source rather than binary; specifically, > I'm looking at the general case where the end user may not have (the > correct version of) LLVM installed, so the compiler can't simply be > run on the end user's machine. > > A solution that occurs to me is to compil...

I noticed we ship the <debian> folder with at least these libraries: libogg-1.1.3 vorbis-tools-1.2.0 By doing this we take the packaging code out of the Debian diffs where some people might be expecting it. Is this a problem? What benefits do you see in shipping it? Greetings, Sebastian

One issue I've been looking at with regard to using LLVM as a compiler backend is distribution of programs, particularly on Linux where different distributions have different binary package formats and it is usual to ship programs as source rather than binary; specifically, I'm looking at the general case where the end user may not have (the correct version of) LLVM installed, so the compiler can't simply be run on the end user's machine. A solution that occurs to me is to compile as far as assembler on...

Has anyone been able to get a UPS shipping calculator implemented into their site with Rails? It seems the only options they show on their site both use UPS''s own page displayed either standalone or within your own header and footer, but no straight API with a callback or anything. Can anyone point me in the right direction...