search for: shifti

...e coding in the documents themselves remains as it should. The project involves multiple files that have become what I would call "massively huge." I had reviewed the coding part way through some of the files and the error was not there - is there any way to get my work back or undo the shiftiness? I''m quite desperate at this point as I need to deliver coding reports to my advisor and there''s a lot of information in the files that I need. I''m running v. 1.0.1 on a PC, but have access to a linux-based system if there''s any way to undo the error there....

On 5 February 2014 09:45, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 1/31/14 5:23 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > > On 30 January 2014 09:55, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > >> On 1/29/14 3:40 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> >>> The LLVM Module has an optional target triple and target datalayout. >>> Without them, an

I'm having an issue with an apache web server running the latest CentOS5 kernel (this issue is not new to the kernel). After a few days/weeks of running the server will become unresponsive and will require a physical reboot in order to come back online. The system is so unresponsive when the issue occurs that login at console is not even possible. I have atop installed and have looked back

Hi, Let me try to re-formulate, please tell me if I'm wrong. You have a bunch of users declared locally in /etc/passwd or something like that on one system. Now you would like to have another system using this users list with Samba. You also want these users to be valid only as long as the share exist. You don't want these users to be able to connect on system(s). If I'm right,

mathias dufresne schreef op 12-07-2016 13:39: > Hi, > > Let me try to re-formulate, please tell me if I'm wrong. > > You have a bunch of users declared locally in /etc/passwd or something > like that on one system. > > Now you would like to have another system using this users list with > Samba. > You also want these users to be valid only as long as the share

I haven't yet fully read your mail, still trying to understand. Anyway all that I read is about complexity of using several users databases. Why not use only one user database? AD is a user database, can be used on all these systems, can be used in conjunction with Samba... All user names, UIDs and GIDs would be into the same DB, they would be coherent (if you don't mess up your DB

On 30 January 2014 09:55, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 1/29/14 3:40 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> The LLVM Module has an optional target triple and target datalayout. >> Without them, an llvm::DataLayout can't be constructed with meaningful >> data. The benefit to making them optional is to permit optimization that >> would work