search for: sharepaths

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:30:11PM +0000, Antonio via samba wrote: >Dear All, > >I'm sorry to bother the list with a problem that I am not sure >originates in Samba. >File server (no domain) is serving a mix of Windows 10 and Centos 7 >clients, I have strange byte range locks. > >- Server is Samba 4.17.5 / Kernel 5.14.0 Rocky 9.2 > >smbstatus -B gives: >

Dear All, I'm sorry to bother the list with a problem that I am not sure originates in Samba. File server (no domain) is serving a mix of Windows 10 and Centos 7 clients, I have strange byte range locks. - Server is Samba 4.17.5 / Kernel 5.14.0 Rocky 9.2 smbstatus -B gives: - When client is Windows 10: Byte range locks: Pid??????? dev:inode?????? R/W? start???? size

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

Samba version 3.0.24-4 on a Fedora Core 5 box. I've been working solidly on this for the last 2 days but don't seem to be getting anywhere. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. I've found that once a file has been opened, smbstatus shows the file is locked as expected (see below) Locked files: Pid Uid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock

I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only

hello list, congratulations on this new year; and wish the best to all, I am trying to create GPO in samba 4 and this is the error it gives me. ./samba-tool gpo create WSUS -UAdministrator Password for [Administrator]: Using temporary directory /tmp/tmp8t9j8u26 (use --tmpdir to change) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225524, 'The object name is not found.') File

Hi, I would like to dump my GPO policies with the following command "samba-tool gpo backup {LONG-ID-NUMBER}" but it didn't work. System details: - Tranquil IT's repo. - Samba version 4.10.12 - CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) with kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7.x86_64 Command result: ERROR(<class 'UnicodeDecodeError'>): Error copying GPO from DC -

I have a domain that I upgraded from a Samba 3/LDAP set up about a year ago. I haven't done anything too interesting with it and it's generally been working OK. I attempted to create a new GPO for my domain. From a Win 7 client I get an error "This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object". Thinking this was an issue with sysvol acls, I ran "samba-tool

This is the smbstatus with 4.11.x. No problems on clients. Using LC_ALL=C because have Polish locale set up. [root at arch1 ~]# LC_ALL=C smbstatus Samba version 4.11.3 PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing

Hello.. File server freebsd 6.2-STABLE + samba-3.0.25a + ldap + acls Problem: I've a situation where file locking does not seem to be functioning as expected, in that more than one user can open and write to a file without any notifications being displayed about the file already being opened by another user. I have two Windows XP clients accessing the same shared file, user1 has the file

Alex, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still > open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually > open it on the same host without any problems: I don't see where you're opening the file twice from one smbclient below. Am I missing something? And then there's no

I have some identical windows 7 clients. All connected to Samba 3.5.4-1.1-2382-SUSE-SL11.0. If I'm the windows-owner of the file, swat shows me under "oplock" "exclusive+batch". Other users get: "none". What is the reason for this? ___________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt

Hi, I'm currently running Samba 3.0.22 (on an Ubuntu 6.06 [Dapper] server). I have VFS full_audit set up successfully to log user activity using the LOCAL6 facility. I also have syslog configured to redirect all messages from this facility to /var/log/samba/log.audit This is working fine. However, I've recently been getting lines in /var/log/syslog that look like they're coming

Hi, My output of smbstatus is bugged somehow in the Locked files section. For every line with a non ascii character, the whole string from the character to the end (included) is removed. Hence the line is attached to the next one. Here is a simplified example Locked files: Pid ... SharePath Name Time --------------------------------- 8910 ... /path

Hi Ralph, I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually open it on the same host without any problems: host 1: smbclient -U ajc //172.31.0.120/ifa_v ... smb: \jmi\Corporate Accounting\ISL Ltd Accounts\2016\1609\> open "201609 213_ ISL Balance sheet variance analysis.xls" open file

Good morning list, I am using samba4.11.4, From the cosola I put ./samba-tool gpo create WSUS -Uadministrator and I get the following error Password for [ECCMG\administrator]:********* Using temporary directory /tmp/tmp2mk294gd (use --tmpdir to change) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225524, 'The object name is not found.') File

Hi list! I have an Ubuntu 14.04 Server with Samba 4.1.6 acting as Active Directory controller. I worked 'till today, now I tried to join a new PC to the domain and it does not work... Problems: start and shutdown scripts are NOT called at all, logon scripts are called on the first PC, but not in the new one. The new PC did not receive the policies and did not mount the shares. gpupdate

16.03.2024 21:26, Ralph Boehme wrote: > On 3/16/24 18:18, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Enabling strict renames does not change anything.? Yes it prevents from >> renaming a directory if a file is open inside.? But not renaming a plain >> file which is locked. > > oh, you mean just rename a plain file that is currently opened by some client? That is possible as long as all

Forgot to add the tcpdump command used: tcpdump -p -s 0 -n -w /root/tcpdump_all.txt Pawel. wt., 5 maj 2020 o 00:01 pavlos <pavlos.audiofreak at gmail.com> napisa?(a): > OK, have repeated the test: > > - samba logs: > http://www.mediafire.com/file/jy4qcyvqg6z39zu/logs.tar.gz/file > - tcpdump log: >

Hello, I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of errors logs: 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:338(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file myDomain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Registry.pol --