search for: sharedlibs

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "sharedlibs".

Did you mean: shared_libs
2008 Sep 08
1
Help about the Rxfax on asterisk
Hi all, I have a trixbox2.6.1 on my one server, i have configured sangoma A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card on that server, from my zap line the incoming faxes are coming, i have setup the did for zap channel. my question is when i am getting any faxes, asterisk shows me rxfax execution and suddently asterisk crashes and i can't get email notification for received faxes. any one help me
2002 Jan 30
1
Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with zlib 1.1.3. Index: zlib/ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/zlib/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 ChangeLog --- zlib/ChangeLog 7 May 1998 06:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ zlib/ChangeLog 30 Jan 2002 01:12:41 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,54 @@ ChangeLog
2004 Nov 24
0
Have anyone successfully install Daniel G729 test suite ? mine core dumped !!
Dear guys , my box spec : [root@localhost asterisk]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping : 10 cpu MHz : 1002.289 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception
2007 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is this normal? Am I linking to "too much" or not using the correct link flags?
2001 Jul 03
2
need newer binutils?
Hi, I tried to compile wine and got the message: ... check if it is possible to make a Libary... no *** If you use Linux *** you need a newer binutils *** cause of the shared libs so I looked for newer binutils, and tried to complie them: binutils-2.9.5.0.37 configure, make, make install but wine gives me the same message :( The next idea was, to replace the ld... with newer one. But when I
2013 Apr 30
2
What is the significance of 22 in the Debian libxapian22 packages
What is the significance of 22 in the Debian libxapian22 and libxapian22-dbg packages? According to http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libxapian22 they are built from upstream versions 1.2.3 to 1.2.12 (of xapian-core?) The reason for asking is that we need xapian-omega (and hence xapian-core) at 1.2.8 or later. Previously we have built and installed directly from source but a package
2020 Aug 29
0
[klibc:riscv64-enable-relax] Kbuild, klcc: Support multiple objects in KLIBCCRTSHARED
Commit-ID: 95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:29:52 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:53:10 +0100 [klibc] Kbuild, klcc: Support
2020 Aug 20
0
[klibc:master] klcc: Treat CC, LD, STRIP as multiple words
Commit-ID: 7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:48:07 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:50:09 +0100 [klibc] klcc: Treat CC, LD, STRIP
2007 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? Right now it's ~1.5 to 2M for one platform, at least on darwin. > I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls > to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is > very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is
1999 Dec 23
1
rpart on Alpha under OSF
Running on an Alpha machine which reports (uname -a) OSF1 bsdx01.bs.ehu.es V4.0 878 alpha and using the binary distribution put together by Albrecht Gebhardt (in http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/osf/osf4.0/tar/alpha_ev5/) I obtain core dumps whenever I try to use package rpart. I have R REMOVE'd the rpart package, downloaded the source rpart_1.0-7.tar from CRAN and
2016 Mar 07
2
Windows port
Hi! I would like to ask about current state of Windows port. Is it frozen? It will be cool to know the plans :) Where are a lot of Windows-branches at GitHub. What is the most actual one? The Windows builder looks like turned off, am I right that it is not available currently and where were no builds after version 2.6.5-6? I couldn't find any info about proper environment to build Windows