Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "sharedlibs".
Did you mean:
shared_libs
2008 Sep 08
1
Help about the Rxfax on asterisk
Hi all,
I have a trixbox2.6.1 on my one server,
i have configured sangoma A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card on that
server,
from my zap line the incoming faxes are coming, i have setup the did for zap
channel.
my question is when i am getting any faxes, asterisk shows me rxfax
execution and suddently asterisk crashes
and i can't get email notification for received faxes.
any one help me
2002 Jan 30
1
Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with
zlib 1.1.3.
Index: zlib/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/zlib/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 ChangeLog
--- zlib/ChangeLog 7 May 1998 06:19:41 -0000 1.1
+++ zlib/ChangeLog 30 Jan 2002 01:12:41 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,54 @@
ChangeLog
2004 Nov 24
0
Have anyone successfully install Daniel G729 test suite ? mine core dumped !!
Dear guys ,
my box spec :
[root@localhost asterisk]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 1002.289
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception
2007 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT?
I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls to
XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is very large
(Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is this normal? Am I linking
to "too much" or not using the correct link flags?
2001 Jul 03
2
need newer binutils?
Hi,
I tried to compile wine and got the message:
...
check if it is possible to make a Libary... no
*** If you use Linux
*** you need a newer binutils
*** cause of the shared libs
so I looked for newer binutils, and tried to complie them:
binutils-2.9.5.0.37
configure, make, make install
but wine gives me the same message :(
The next idea was, to replace the ld... with newer one.
But when I
2013 Apr 30
2
What is the significance of 22 in the Debian libxapian22 packages
What is the significance of 22 in the Debian libxapian22 and
libxapian22-dbg packages? According to
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libxapian22 they are built
from upstream versions 1.2.3 to 1.2.12 (of xapian-core?)
The reason for asking is that we need xapian-omega (and hence
xapian-core) at 1.2.8 or later. Previously we have built and installed
directly from source but a package
2020 Aug 29
0
[klibc:riscv64-enable-relax] Kbuild, klcc: Support multiple objects in KLIBCCRTSHARED
Commit-ID: 95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1
Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
AuthorDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:29:52 +0100
Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
CommitDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:53:10 +0100
[klibc] Kbuild, klcc: Support
2020 Aug 20
0
[klibc:master] klcc: Treat CC, LD, STRIP as multiple words
Commit-ID: 7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2
Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:48:07 +0100
Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
CommitDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:50:09 +0100
[klibc] klcc: Treat CC, LD, STRIP
2007 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT?
Right now it's ~1.5 to 2M for one platform, at least on darwin.
> I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls
> to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is
> very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is
1999 Dec 23
1
rpart on Alpha under OSF
Running on an Alpha machine which reports (uname -a)
OSF1 bsdx01.bs.ehu.es V4.0 878 alpha
and using the binary distribution put together by Albrecht Gebhardt
(in http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/osf/osf4.0/tar/alpha_ev5/) I
obtain core dumps whenever I try to use package rpart. I have R
REMOVE'd the rpart package, downloaded the source rpart_1.0-7.tar from
CRAN and
2016 Mar 07
2
Windows port
Hi!
I would like to ask about current state of Windows port. Is it frozen? It will be cool to know the plans :)
Where are a lot of Windows-branches at GitHub. What is the most actual one?
The Windows builder looks like turned off, am I right that it is not available currently and where were no builds after version 2.6.5-6?
I couldn't find any info about proper environment to build Windows