search for: shared_libs

...ince g++5.x, although it's probably safe to drop by now, especially when CXX=clang++. That's g++-specific, so is irrelevant to the issue at hand. > I wonder if there is a bug that was fixed. I have bootstrapped with > ThinLTO with the 3.9 compiler, but not with LLDB and not with > SHARED_LIBS=ON. I can try with an older 3.9 version. As you seem to have faster hardware, I would appreciate a validation before I embark on another >=3h build endavour. > Not sure I followed that, but in essence you just want to make sure that > llvm-ranlib and llvm-ar match the build compiler. So...

...ding PATH with the locally moved tree of the previously installed PREFIX for llvm. Is that a problem? > 2) Used my own binutils checkout as I don't have plugin-api.h > installed in /usr/include Curious, is your host binutils too old for that to exist in /usr/include? > 3) Set BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON (which I don't see in your earlier > config, did you add that later?) What I emailed earlier was the full set of flags passed to cmake, and I had just added SHARED_LIBS=OFF as suggested for the next rebuild. Should I use ON or OFF? > 4) Set LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS=1 (probably not ne...

On 9/18/2017 8:20 PM, Diptorup Deb via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > We are upgrading an LLVM 4.0-based opt module to LLVM 5.0. After the > upgrade our module works when built with an LLVM Debug build, but > with an LLVM Release build we are encountering the following error. > > This happens after our passes have successfully run. I believe this > has to do with the way our

On Sep 12, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/11/14 22:34, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I see a libusb_get_interrupt message in the log. Could that be the problem? >> Yes, it seems related. >> >> 1.126896 upsdrv_initinfo...

...a make and make install. # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.22 2013/08/07 15:37:09 naddy Exp $ COMMENT = library for USB device access from userspace VERSION = 1.0.9 DISTNAME = libusb-${VERSION} PKGNAME = libusb1-${VERSION} REVISION = 8 SHARED_LIBS += usb-1.0 1.0 # 1.0 CATEGORIES = devel HOMEPAGE = http://www.libusb.org MAINTAINER = Martin Pieuchot <mpi at openbsd.org> # LGPL 2.1 PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = Yes WANTLIB = pthread MASTER_SITES = ${MASTE...

Hi, We are upgrading an LLVM 4.0-based opt module to LLVM 5.0. After the upgrade our module works when built with an LLVM Debug build, but with an LLVM Release build we are encountering the following error. This happens after our passes have successfully run. I believe this has to do with the way our passes are registered. Would greatly appreciate some pointers, as to where to look. Program

On 09/11/14 22:34, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Sep 11, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I see a libusb_get_interrupt message in the log. Could that be the problem? > Yes, it seems related. > > 1.126896 upsdrv_initinfo... > 1.126906 upsdrv_updateinfo... > 1.127023 libusb_get_interrupt: Function not implemented >

...ile Wed May 31 08:29:37 2006 +++ ./Makefile Fri Jun 2 08:18:32 2006 @@ -1,11 +1,9 @@ # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.3 2005/12/30 05:35:56 jakemsr Exp $ COMMENT= "open video codec" -DISTNAME= libtheora-1.0alpha4 -PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0 +DISTNAME= libtheora-1.0alpha6 CATEGORIES= multimedia SHARED_LIBS= theora 1.0 -MODGNU_SHARED_LIBS= theora '' MASTER_SITES= http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/theora/ @@ -27,9 +25,6 @@ USE_LIBTOOL= Yes SEPARATE_BUILD= concurrent CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu -post-install: - ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/libtheora - ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/doc/...

...ing cmake today, probably a few at least for windows, but this would definitely help to maintain consistency between cmake and autoconf, if we take into consideration the point below - build options coverage : for example with or without shared libraries. I have not checked recently, but cmake+shared_libs used to fail in "make (or ninja) check-llvm" for bugpoint. On my side, I have been using both options (clean build or warm build). The problem is you do not catch the same rough edges / corner cases : stale file pick up or a problem with a automatically generated files comes to me as...

Hi all, A discussion was being carried on llvmcommits about the extra time for cleaning and re-building objects that didn't need to be built on buildbots. Since they just update the repository, builds could be a lot faster if we let the objects in place. Even faster if we used Ninja with CMake. Is there a crucial reason why we're still using autoconf for all builds? Some of us

...gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> I'll either need to get a reproducer from you and/or try to repro it > myself. > > > > Assuming I run into this with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF, which seems > unlikely, > > what kind of reproducer data would you need from me? > Let me see if I can reproduce it first. Probably a zip of all the inputs to the link and the link command line. Another option would be to save the temp files, but it would require some work to find...