search for: share3

...eserver's filesystem is ext4. The NFS shares are mounted on the backup server as follows: fileserver:/mnt/storage/share1 /mnt/share1 type nfs (ro,tcp,bg,soft,intr,addr=192.168.1.1) fileserver:/mnt/storage/share2 /mnt/share2 type nfs (ro,tcp,bg,soft,intr,addr=192.168.1.1) fileserver:/mnt/storage/share3 /mnt/share3 type nfs (ro,tcp,bg,soft,intr,addr=192.168.1.1) These shares contain a large amount of files, including SVN checkouts, extracted kernel trees, etc. I've run into a problem where rsync will appear to hang or block indefinitely when backing up one particular share, share3, but occasi...

I have a client (Fedora 19) and a server (Fedora 14/Samba 3.5.11) which works fine. I'm now setting up a new server (Fedora 20/Samba 4.1.3) with more or less the same smb.conf 1. Issuing: sudo smbclient -L //srv001 -U suser list all shares correct. 2. Issuing: sudo mount -t cifs //srv/Share3 /mnt/share3/ -o username=suser Password for suser@//srv/Share3: **** Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) My problem is the Clients netbios name in smb.conf At following line in smb.conf: include...

Hi all- I''m hoping someone can help me with this problem with Xen under CentOS 5.1 (RHEL 5.1) I''m having... This is the Xen package that comes stock with the distribution, I didn''t compile it from source. I can boot Domain0 and the hypervisor just fine. I''m trying to bring up a Xen guest VM and it crashes on boot, with this error: # xm create -c tcga1

Most of you will probably think about this "It's not a real problem". But not my boss. I want to exchange our Netware server with a linux/SMABA one but my boss wants to have on the new server exactly the same directories structure like in the Netware server. And here it is what I couldn't done : user X wich have two secondary groups Y and Z must browse in Win95 _only_ the Y and

...de = 0700 ??????? recycle:repository = %H/.Papierkorb/%S [share2] ??????? comment = Share 2 ??????? inherit acls = Yes ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? smb encrypt = desired ??????? valid users = +SUBDOM+worker +SUBDOM+user ??????? acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes [share3] ??????? comment = Share 3 ??????? create mask = 0660 ??????? directory mask = 0770 ??????? force create mode = 0660 ??????? force directory mode = 0770 ??????? force group = "SUBDOM+group2" ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB...

...le access using only one SMB mount. For example, the SMB share is under /smbfiles in the root directory of the Samba server. Within /smbfiles, there are three symlinks. /smbfiles/share1 points to /mounts/pawalton/hda/root/files /smbfiles/share2 points to /mounts/pawalton/hdb/user_files /smbfiles/share3 points to /mounts/pawalton/hdb/admin_files I use an ssh tunnel to forward the smb port on johnboy to my local machine (doublemint), and the port forwards quite nicely. I can get access to my files using smbclient. However, when I try to mount /smbfiles from johnboy onto the mountpoint I've c...

...using only one SMB mount. For example, the | SMB share is under /smbfiles in the root directory of the Samba server. | Within /smbfiles, there are three symlinks. | | /smbfiles/share1 points to /mounts/pawalton/hda/root/files | /smbfiles/share2 points to /mounts/pawalton/hdb/user_files | /smbfiles/share3 points to /mounts/pawalton/hdb/admin_files | | I use an ssh tunnel to forward the smb port on johnboy to my local | machine (doublemint), and the port forwards quite nicely. I can get | access to my files using smbclient. However, when I try to mount | /smbfiles from johnboy onto the mountpoint I...

...le to access shares by the department they belong to. Thus the users need only one drive letter and not many in their windows explorer. To accomplish this I tried the msdfs approach and it's working very nicely. on serverA: share1 -> msdfs:serverA\share1 share2 -> msdfs:serverA\share2 share3 -> msdfs:serverA\share3 ... I'm just wondering if I will introduce unnecessary overhead by exporting _local_ shares this way? The shares have different permissions and not all of them share the same config options. Thus I would like to keep them as separate shares and not just link them wi...

Dear All I have a question from you, if you can please answer it. I have a linux server, with samba installed on it. I have 3 groups as, GroupA, GroupB, GroupC Each group is having let suppose 10 members from 0-9 I have 3 shares on my smb.con as Share1, Share2, and Share3 Now what I want it to give the read access to every one on each share and give write access of GroupA to Share1, Share2 give write access of GroupB to Share2 give write access of GroupC to Share3 I also have two folders in Share1, and Share2 named Folder1, and Folder2 respectively Now GroupA sha...

Hi, is it possible, to use DFS and show the correct values of free space? I set up a DFS-share located on filesystem1 (size 50GB) and linked shares of another server to this share (msdfs:<fs>\share): share1: size 110TB share2: size 50TB share3: size 20TB But connecting to the DFS-share, the disk size of this network drive ist 50GB. Unfortunately files larger than 50GB can not be copied to the network drive . Any ideas? Thanks and best, Alex

...ldren) "/" "Shared/test/Share" * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Shared/test2" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Shared/test2/Share2" * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Shared/test3" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Shared/test3/Share3" 2 OK List completed. 2 LIST "" "%" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Shared" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Shared" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" &quo...

Hi. I've a running samba system that works with a ADS auth. All looks like to work. I can get the list of Domain users and groups (wbinfo -u, wbinfo -g), and "getent passwd" works too. Now I want to share a directory(or volume) and that the DOMAIN/Administrator be the owner of this share to get the control of it. I don't know how samba deals with resource owners and

Hi Am 09.03.20 um 16:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 09/03/2020 14:25, Andreas Hauffe via samba wrote: >> [global] >> ??????? dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab >> ??????? kerberos method = secrets and keytab > Why the dedicated keytab ? We have a kerberized NFS4 running on that machine, too. > >> workgroup = ILRW >> ??????? idmap config dom :

...??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker ??????? vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle crossrename [share2] ??????? comment = Share 2 ??????? inherit acls = Yes ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker SUBDOM\user ??????? acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes [share3] ??????? comment = Share 3 ??????? create mask = 0660 ??????? directory mask = 0770 ??????? force create mode = 0660 ??????? force directory mode = 0770 ??????? force group = SUBDOM\group2 ??????? path = PATHNAME ??????? read only = No ??????? root preexec = /bin/MK_PAPIERKORB %H "%u&...

...B | +- dir1 <- directory manually created in /export/publicsmb | | | +-share1 <- junction point | | | +-share2 <- junction point +- share2 <- junction point | +- dir2 <- directory manually created in /export/publicsmb | | | +-share3 <- junction point | | | +-dir3 <- directory manually created in /export/publicsmb/dir2 | | | +-share4 <- junction point ... In my oppinion, it is only an extension in msdfs.c. Thanks, Andreas Pohl pohl@vegu.de ------------------------------------------------...

...y daily logwatch i get these type of entries: smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) workstation1 (10.19.1.2) connect to service share1 initially as user user1 (uid=802, gid=512) (pid 28851) : 5 Time(s) on all shares that user1 connects to, i get the same message identifying the share (share2, share3, etc...) with same pid number. the same thing happens with user2 with a different pid number. the setup is pretty vanilla. i use smbpasswd to authenticate. the server is the domain/local master. smb.conf [global] workgroup = office1 netbios name = server1 encrypt passwords = yes...

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

Hi all. Thought you would all be interested to know that i, like many others, am experiencing issues with Samba and Photoshop 7.0. The problem is specific to Photoshop 7.0 when saving files to a Samba share via a W2k/XP OS. Users experience a disk full error when saving from Photoshop but have no issues copying/moving etc files to/from the share outside of PS. Well, after some testing, the

...???? vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle crossrename > > [share2] > ??????? comment = Share 2 > ??????? inherit acls = Yes > ??????? path = PATHNAME > ??????? read only = No > ??????? valid users = SUBDOM\worker SUBDOM\user > ??????? acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > [share3] > ??????? comment = Share 3 > ??????? create mask = 0660 > ??????? directory mask = 0770 > ??????? force create mode = 0660 > ??????? force directory mode = 0770 > ??????? force group = SUBDOM\group2 > ??????? path = PATHNAME > ??????? read only = No > ??????? root preex...

Hi Guys, Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management nightmare, is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I can include all the shares to mount and it will silently fail on the ones it cant? Perhaps there is a smarter way to implement this idea, lynching is welcome, so is