Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "shantanugadgil".
2012 Apr 26
7
Syslinux 4.10-pre20
I think I finally have nailed down the problems with TFTP on the 4.10
branch, and so I have released 4.10-pre20.
Please let me know if you have hardware on which 4.05/4.06-pre3 works,
and 4.10-pre20 does not.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
2013 Jul 04
2
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 7/4/13, Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: [syslinux] Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
To: "Shantanu Gadgil" <shantanugadgil at yahoo.com>
Cc: syslinux at zytor.com
Date: Thursday, July 4, 2013, 4:51 PM
On Wed, 03 Jul, at 11:22:27PM,
Shantanu Gadgil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a happy user of version 4.06 and have been hoping
to upgrade the 5.x series (for the HTTP bits).
> I have the following probl...
2013 Jul 05
0
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
<shantanugadgil at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7/4/13, Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [syslinux] Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
> To: "Shantanu Gadgil" <shantanugadgil at yahoo.com>
> Cc: syslinux at zytor.com
> Date: Thursday, July 4...
2013 Jul 04
5
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
Hi,
I am a happy user of version 4.06 and have been hoping to upgrade the 5.x series (for the HTTP bits).
I have the following problems with the 5.11-pre7 build:
1. TFTP load is horribly slow ... even when the two REAL machines are connected to the same switch.
For a typical RHEL installation, the vmlinuz loads ... the initrd.img loads very very slowly and just times out (I waited over 10 mins)
2012 May 03
1
test message
Test message to see if something is wrong with the mailing list!
Regards,
Shantanu
2013 Oct 20
0
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Shantanu Gadgil
<shantanugadgil at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a happy user of version 4.06 and have been hoping to upgrade the 5.x series (for the HTTP bits).
> I have the following problems with the 5.11-pre7 build:
>
> 1. TFTP load is horribly slow ... even when the two REAL machines are connected to...
2013 Oct 21
1
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 10/20/13, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote:
Shantanu, could you please try v6.02?? Your scenario
failed on my
OptiPlex 760 but with 6.02, it works.
See also http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
Nope, still no joy on the physical machines.
Different symptoms though.
On the physical machines:
The HTTP starts
2014 Jul 14
1
[syslinux:master] PXE ISR: Force polling on select hardware WORKAROUND
Hi all,
Based on the commitdiff comments, this looks like what I (and many many others) have been plagued with.
Machines typically affected:
DELL PowerEdge 2950, R720, R810, etc. (server class)
DELL PowerEdge 960 (desktop class)
Eagerly awaiting the next pre-release to test this out!
: thumbs up : : thumbs up :
Regards,
Shantanu
2014 Aug 14
0
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/11/14, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [syslinux] testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
To: "Shantanu Gadgil" <shantanugadgil at yahoo.com>, "syslinux at zytor.com" <syslinux at zytor.com>
Date: Monday, August 11, 2014, 10:21 PM
On 08/11/2014 06:12 AM,
Shantanu Gadgil wrote:
...
...
> * Things are broken using 6.03-pre17
lpxelinux.0 and working correctly using 6.03-pre19
lpxelinux.0
>...
2014 Aug 11
2
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
On 08/11/2014 06:12 AM, Shantanu Gadgil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I too am getting positive results using 6.03-pre19 lpxelinux.0, for the problem that I have been facing.
>
> The symptom was that booting hangs on client side.
> On the server (DNSMasq TFTP) it keeps getting a request for the same (MAC address) file.
> OR, alternatively it just stops completely.
>
> My
2014 Aug 15
3
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
>
> We are not ready for "prime-time" though.
> Using the "lpxelinux.0" file from 6.03-pre19 ...
>
> My RHEL5 installs, when using the "http://" for kernel, initrd and append lines, seem to be hitting some sort of parameter length limit.
> The culprit seems to be the long "append" line.
>
> The same append line, when NOT using
2010 Mar 02
2
chain.c32 "Chainboot failed!"
Hi,
I am using syslinux-4.00-pre24, -pre27 and -pre31. chain.c32 fails for pre27 and pre31 for particular configs ... shown below.
1) works on pre24, fails with error message "Chainboot failed!" for pre27 and pre31
LABEL local
MENU DEFAULT
MENU LABEL Local Boot ... (skip PXE boot)
KERNEL chain.c32
APPEND hd0 0
2) works on all three.
LABEL local
2010 Jul 21
1
Use .xz (LZMA) for posting releases?
Hi,
Would it be possible to ship the releases using xz (or lzma) ?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3423720 Jul 20 12:17 syslinux-4.02-pre5.tar.xz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3423147 Jul 20 12:17 syslinux-4.02-pre5.tar.lzma
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4395234 Jul 20 12:17 syslinux-4.02-pre5.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20080640 Jul 20 12:17 syslinux-4.02-pre5.tar
Regards,
Shantanu
2013 May 16
1
Syslinux 5.x and VMware ESXi mboot.c32
Hi,
I have had a VMware ESXi network boot setup for quite some time now.
After upgrading from 4.06 to 5.01 (or 5.10-pre3) the network boot fails with the following error:
--- snip ---
Failed to load COM32 file esxi/5.1.0/mboot.c32
boot:
--- snip ---
This error is seen for the ESXi bootup only.
The default mboot.c32 from syslinux itself doesn't work and this setup has been working with
2014 May 28
1
PXELINUX problems with 6.03-pre12
Hi,
I have been using 6.03-pre11 lpxelinux.0 to deliver standard (TFTP) and HTTP based vmlinuz and kernel images.
Things are working fine.
When I upgraded the same to 6.03-pre12 it stopped working.
On the console of the machine that is booting, is stalls infinitely at the line:
PXELINUX 6.03 lwIP 6.03-pre12 Copyright (C) 1994-2014 H. Peter Anvin et al
Screen shot attached.
FWIW:
1. the
2014 Aug 11
0
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
Hi all,
I too am getting positive results using 6.03-pre19 lpxelinux.0, for the problem that I have been facing.
The symptom was that booting hangs on client side.
On the server (DNSMasq TFTP) it keeps getting a request for the same (MAC address) file.
OR, alternatively it just stops completely.
My server: OptiPlex 755. BIOS A22
The PXE booting client: OptiPlex 960. BIOS A17
* Things are
2014 Aug 20
1
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/18/14, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote:
But
then you report that typing in the exact same full command,
it
boots OK?
I don't type the /complete/ command by hand. I let the error box popup
and then I type in the missing 6 characters and then press ENTER.
The installation then continues.
Regards,
Shantanu
2011 Jul 16
2
syslinux-4.10-pre15 and KVM guest booting problem
Hi,
I have a problem to report with the 4.10-pre15 branch.
The problem is that my KVM guest "just reboots" when booting off the network.
The setup is as follows:
Host OS: RHEL 6.0/RHEL 6.1 with the default packages (no additional repos or packages)
KVM guest configured to network boot.
(maybe irrelevant info ...) ?!?
DHCP server (using dnsmasq) in the same subnet as the KVM host.
2010 Feb 24
1
PXELINUX + LOCALBOOT disables network within operating system
Hi,
I am using syslinux-3.85 (and before till 3.72) and I have seen a peculiar problem on a couple of machines that I have in my lab.
The problem is that if the machine boots onto PXE, and then does a "LOCALBOOT 0", the networking component of the OS stops working !!!
If I skip PXE boot, and just let the OS boot, the OS's networking is working fine.
The problem is seen of all the
2012 Jun 04
3
Syslinux 4.10-pre20
--- On Thu, 5/31/12, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> > P.S.
> > As usual, eagerly (and patiently) waiting for the HTTP
> bits to start
> > working properly! ;) :)
>
> How should I read that??.? Does it mean "I'm waiting to
> get time to test"
> or do you mean "tested, it doesn't work yet"???
> Anyway, please