search for: sfconserv

...n with two make-or-break levels: a lower level that will just sustain the organization for a 'bare minimum' service plan to our member projects, and a separate, higher level to continue doing copyleft enforcement. You can read more detail about all of this on our website: http://sfconservancy.org/supporter/ You, our existing Supporters already understand what we do (check out the list of this year's successes on the fundraising page http://sfconservancy.org/supporter/) and why it's important. A very high percentage of you are prominent contributors, speakers, writers and le...

For a number of years now, the Samba Team has been a member of the Software Freedom Conservancy. They handle quite a bit of administration for our project as well as pursuing GPL compliance. If you'd like to see more about what they do, please check: https://sfconservancy.org/about/ We urge you to support the Conservancy. Here is a message from our own Jeremy Allison: https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2015/dec/09/jra-supporter-video/ Jim McDonough Samba Team -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:...

"Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not inte...

On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:14 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: >> I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the >> developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, >> or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, >> discussed below. If you&...

Xapian is in the process of joining the Software Freedom Conservancy (https://sfconservancy.org/), but one thing we need to sort out before we can finalise this is some sort of more formal project leadership structure. James Aylett and I have discussed this with Bradley Kuhn from Conservancy, and we think the most appropriate model currently would be a small group of at least 3 (to a...

We are equally excited about working with you over summer. I think you missed reply by Olly on IRC, you can find it in logs here: https://botbot.me/freenode/xapian/2018-04-24/?msg=99336093&page=1 - olly icebyte[m]: i think that probably needs to go through SFC ( https://sfconservancy.org/) as the "legal entity" - 2:05 am <https://botbot.me/freenode/xapian/msg/99336095/> icebyte[m]: i can talk to them about it - Gaurav On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Uppinder Chugh <uppinderchugh at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for selecting my proposal fo...

...many.? At the time, I was confused about why IBM purchased Red Hat for an astronomical amount.? Well, it is clear now.? As the readers know, there is a significant defect in the GPL: A Comprehensive Analysis of the GPL Issues With the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Business Model <https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2023/jun/23/rhel-gpl-analysis/> The terms of the license are enforceable, not the spirit I think the Rocky Linux workaround will eventually fail.? I expect IBM already has a plan for all contingencies. There is reason for anger.? Is there a reason for hope? frank saporito md

Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list <https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail...

...ns to do). -- Mehdi > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> Many tech communities, including GitHub >> <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved >> away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an >> effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive >> terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list >>...

On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not intere...

Apologies if this is a little off-topic, but the Software Freedom Conservancy (which is the legal umberella organization for the Samba Project and may other Free Software projects such as Wine) just announced their "Supporters" program: http://sfconservancy.org/supporter/ Please check it out, and if you're feeling generous - join :-). Disclaimer: I'm on the Board of Directors of Conservancy (an unpaid position). Cheers, Jeremy.

...hub action (as Mike plans to do). -- Mehdi On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub<https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list<https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/...

...ot; Is that not relevant/not useful for us to wait for that? On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > Many tech communities, including GitHub > <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git > <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved > away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an > effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive > terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list > <https://list...

...hub action (as Mike plans to do). -- Mehdi On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub<https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list<https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/...

On 2023-07-21 00:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: > But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google Workspace. > Why ? > Because the general rule seems to be > Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service > What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. > Because being a 'business' by default

...;> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> Many tech communities, including GitHub >>> <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git >>> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved >>> away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an >>> effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more >>> inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing li...

...gt; >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Many tech communities, including GitHub >> <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved >> away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an >> >> effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive >> terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list...

...hub action (as Mike plans to do). -- Mehdi On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub<https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list<https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/...

...gt; Mehdi > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 6:57 PM Mike Edwards via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Many tech communities, including GitHub > <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git > <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved > away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an > > effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive > terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list > <https:/...

...g obvious has been done outside the letter of the GPL. It is also not clear than any improper use has been made of R Foundation trademarks (such as the R logo). If a lawyer is consulted, one way to find such a lawyer would be to start with someone at the Software Freedom Conservancy: https://sfconservancy.org/ They have contacts with attorneys with experience in GPL licensing and commercialization, in multiple countries. Regards, Brian On 12/09/2014 06:31 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > Hi, > > I would send an introductory e-mail to: > > R-foundation at R-project.org <mailto...