search for: selectivli

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "selectivli".

Did you mean: selectivly
2004 Dec 30
3
OpenVPN forwarding?
I am looking at terminating a OpenVPN tunnel on my shorewall box, but selectivly forward incoming traffic from the VPN tunnel to various hosts on my LOC-zone. Is this doable? Or need I set up OpenVPN tunnels that terminates on the LOC-hosts in question directly? (Or rather: Which page on the web site have I neglected to read _this_ time?) Happy new year to one and all! .
2003 Feb 24
4
Application Blocking
On my windows machine I use a software fire will called ZoneAlarm. One feature I like Is the ability to block applications from using the net. I''ve looked with Shorewall and wonder if it does, or was ever meant to. Not a complaint, a curiosity. Kev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 1572 bytes
2015 May 06
2
Mapping other Inbox method (symlink vs ACL)
Dear Steffan, Noted. Thanks for your feedback! Best Regards Kevin On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > >> By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink >> will allow these features. > >
2015 May 06
2
Mapping other Inbox method (symlink vs ACL)
Dear Steffen, Thanks for your feedback. Appreciate it. By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink will allow these features. ACL does support such features. Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED
2015 May 06
0
Mapping other Inbox method (symlink vs ACL)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink > will allow these features. Symlinks grant all IMAP permissions, the filesystem level permits. That is, with symlinks you cannot selectivly deny permissions easily. > ACL does support such features. > Only problem is that
2006 Mar 01
1
Problem with large tar file.
I have just completed installing CentOS 4.2 (I came over here from Fedora-Land (core-3)). I did this via a fresh install. I tar'd everything to an external drive reinstalled the new stuff and everything is working very well. I've just got one issue. I have a full system backup Backup.tar that has a size of 78,717,880,320. When I issue the command tar -xvf Backup.tar I get only about
2015 May 06
0
Mapping other Inbox method (symlink vs ACL)
Hi Steffan, How do I specify the entire mailbox? I only use ACL via telnet. I tried to use *(wildcard) to indicate entire mailbox but I guess that does not work. Will keep looking but appreciate if you could advise briefly. Thanks Kevin On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Steffan, > Noted. Thanks for your feedback! > Best
2010 Jun 29
1
Use both SQL and LDAP
Hey guys, I am just wondering if it is possible to use both SQL and LDAP queries at the same time to get information. Example on why I want to do this: I work at a school where we have the need for 2 separate types of mailbox configuration (better wording is eluding me at the moment). Staff and Students currently share the same email server. I would like to be able to give staff a bigger
2004 Sep 22
4
PRI messages while running
I have an Asterisk system running on T1 PRI trunks using a TE405P. It seems to be running ok, but one thing puzzles me. Every so often I get a raft of messages like this: -- B-channel 0/1 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/2 successfully restarted on span 1 ....... -- B-channel 0/22 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/23 successfully restarted on span 1 I could
2003 Sep 04
4
update re. Grandstream + SIP + Echo problems ..
well .. good news :) i've just put in txgain=1.0 rxgain=1.0 in my zapata.conf and upgraded the Grandstream Budgettones i'm using to version 81 of the software and all seems fine .. there is still an echo but after the first couple of seconds of call it vanishes, as the echocancelling kicks in .. so far my client is happy :) now .. i have one slight problem left .. although most of my