search for: selectivly

I am looking at terminating a OpenVPN tunnel on my shorewall box, but selectivly forward incoming traffic from the VPN tunnel to various hosts on my LOC-zone. Is this doable? Or need I set up OpenVPN tunnels that terminates on the LOC-hosts in question directly? (Or rather: Which page on the web site have I neglected to read _this_ time?) Happy new year to one and all! .

On my windows machine I use a software fire will called ZoneAlarm. One feature I like Is the ability to block applications from using the net. I''ve looked with Shorewall and wonder if it does, or was ever meant to. Not a complaint, a curiosity. Kev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 1572 bytes

...h: SHA1 > > On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > >> By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink >> will allow these features. > > > Symlinks grant all IMAP permissions, the filesystem level permits. That is, > with symlinks you cannot selectivly deny permissions easily. > >> ACL does support such features. >> Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie >> Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) > > > There are front ends for IMAP ACLs and more importantly for your current > situation: > > http://wik...

Dear Steffen, Thanks for your feedback. Appreciate it. By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink will allow these features. ACL does support such features. Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink > will allow these features. Symlinks grant all IMAP permissions, the filesystem level permits. That is, with symlinks you cannot selectivly deny permissions easily. > ACL does support such features. > Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie > Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) There are front ends for IMAP ACLs and more importantly for your current situation: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/ACL Works gre...

...717,880,320. When I issue the command tar -xvf Backup.tar I get only about 111MB of data restored. Basically /root and a couple other odd things of little consequence. I did have a second backup made with cp -pR <stuff> <dest> so I've still got my all my stuff from which I can selectivly restore as needed but I'm wondering why tar didn't work? (While being very glad I made two backups.) Is there a max size limit to a tar file? A bug in tar? Curiosity plagues me. Thanks for any help.

...May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: >> >>> By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink >>> will allow these features. >> >> >> Symlinks grant all IMAP permissions, the filesystem level permits. That is, >> with symlinks you cannot selectivly deny permissions easily. >> >>> ACL does support such features. >>> Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie >>> Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) >> >> >> There are front ends for IMAP ACLs and more importantly for your current >>...

Hey guys, I am just wondering if it is possible to use both SQL and LDAP queries at the same time to get information. Example on why I want to do this: I work at a school where we have the need for 2 separate types of mailbox configuration (better wording is eluding me at the moment). Staff and Students currently share the same email server. I would like to be able to give staff a bigger

I have an Asterisk system running on T1 PRI trunks using a TE405P. It seems to be running ok, but one thing puzzles me. Every so often I get a raft of messages like this: -- B-channel 0/1 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/2 successfully restarted on span 1 ....... -- B-channel 0/22 successfully restarted on span 1 -- B-channel 0/23 successfully restarted on span 1 I could

well .. good news :) i've just put in txgain=1.0 rxgain=1.0 in my zapata.conf and upgraded the Grandstream Budgettones i'm using to version 81 of the software and all seems fine .. there is still an echo but after the first couple of seconds of call it vanishes, as the echocancelling kicks in .. so far my client is happy :) now .. i have one slight problem left .. although most of my