search for: selectdir

...readers (especially mobile) & reduce the > value of this change. > > I suspect we'll want to just stick with revision + log for now. That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that we want to see appearing and match them like this: for_paths = .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms/Scalar)).* commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] %(log)s > > What's the prefix? There was some discussion of dropping the > [cfe-commits] & similar prefixes. Can that be done? Do we need to...

...this change. >>> >>> I suspect we'll want to just stick with revision + log for now. >> >> That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that we want >> to see appearing and match them like this: >> >> for_paths = .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms/Scalar)).* >> >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] %(log)s > >Could we go one step further and map these paths to names (eg: map >"lib/Analysis", "include/llvm/Analysis&...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Sebastian Pop wrote: >> Chris Lattner wrote: >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like: >> > >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.

...reduce the >> value of this change. >> >> I suspect we'll want to just stick with revision + log for now. > > That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that we want > to see appearing and match them like this: > > for_paths = .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms/Scalar)).* > > commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] %(log)s Could we go one step further and map these paths to names (eg: map "lib/Analysis", "include/llvm/Analysis", "test/An...

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Sebastion, > > I've attached the current configuration file from the server. > > I'm not sure how far you want to go down the "trying to get realize nice > summary path" lines, but if svn_mailer somehow supported running an > external script to process the commit and come up with the path that would > be ideal for

Hi, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like: > > > > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements. > > commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s I just realized that this line does not

...> I suspect we'll want to just stick with revision + log for now. > >> > >> That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that > we want > >> to see appearing and match them like this: > >> > >> for_paths = > .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms/Scalar)).* > >> > >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] > %(log)s > > > >Could we go one step further and map these paths to names (eg: map > >"lib/Analysis"...

...he >> value of this change. >> >> I suspect we'll want to just stick with revision + log for now. > > That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that > we want to see appearing and match them like this: > > for_paths = > .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms > /Scalar)).* > > commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] > %(log)s Could we go one step further and map these paths to names (eg: map "lib/Analysis", "include/llvm/Analysis", &...

...ick with revision + log for now. > > >> > > >> That's fine. Alternatively we can provide a list of all the dirs that > > we want > > >> to see appearing and match them like this: > > >> > > >> for_paths = > > > .*(?P<SelectDirs>(lib/Analysis|lib/Transforms/Vectorize|lib/Transforms/Scalar)).* > > >> > > >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - [%(SelectDirs)s] > > %(log)s > > > > > >Could we go one step further and map these paths to names (eg: map > &gt...