Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "sec_serv".
Did you mean:
sc_serv
2016 May 30
2
Need stronger SRTP ciphers (256 bit)
Hi folks,
At least several endpoints (soft phone and desk phones) are supporting various 256 bit ciphers for SRTP these days. I *believe* libsrtp has been updated to allow this, and that only the code in Asterisk has not been been updated to allow these stronger ciphers.
Would anyone with the know-how be willing/able to submit a patch ?
Thank you,
Kevin Long
2008 Sep 21
1
[SOLVED] Howto auth against an NT domain I don't control?
After many more hours of searching, I found someone else in the exact same
situation as me. But even better, he figured it out and posted a patch!
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2008-February/057829.html
Thank you Claude!
--
http://theamigo.blogspot.com
1998 Jul 13
1
password server problem
We are using samba with a NT4.0 Primary Domain Controller as a samba password
server.
Logon validation on the primary domain controller works fine, the NT machine
validates the user password.
BUT: On the NT PDC the event log shows numerous entries saying:
Unknown user or wrong password
Did anybody experience this too ????
Rainer von Bongartz
/D/I/L/
rainer.von-bongartz@dil.de
1998 Jun 19
1
SAMBA 1.9.18p8, username map, server security
I have a problem with new version (1.9.18p8) of SAMBA and username
mapping.
Configuration:
WindowsNT 4.0 Workstation + SP1
WindowsNT domain - NTEP01 is PDC
Digital UNIX 3.2C
Username on NT:
Babor
Username on UNIX:
baborl
In SMB.CONF I have following lines:
[global]
security = server
password server = NTEP01
username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map
username.map:
baborl = babor
2000 Jan 30
0
More checks for param/loadparm.c
...ters. It's a pstring global.
> ***************************************************************************/
> static BOOL handle_password_server(char *pszParmValue, char **parm_ptr) {
> char *p;
> pstring buf;
>
> *buf = '\0';
> if (Globals.security != SEC_SERVER && Globals.security != SEC_DOMAIN) {
> DEBUG(0,("WARNING: password server set to \"%s\", ",pszParmValue));
> DEBUGADD(0,("but security is neither server nor domain.\n"
> "password server value ignored\n"));
> retur...
2000 Jan 27
0
service_ok, redux.
...;
> "domain logons is true.\n"));
>
> if (Globals.security == SEC_SHARE)
> DEBUG(0,( "WARNING: security should be domain if "
> "domain logons is true.\n"));
> else if (Globals.security == SEC_USER
> || Globals.security == SEC_SERVER)
> DEBUG(0,( "NOTICE: security = user or security == server will only "
> "support domain logons from Windows 95 and 98, not NT.\n"));
> }
>
> } /* End of globals. */
>
>
> /* Now do per-service options, starting with ERRORs. *...
2000 Jan 27
1
Proposed improvements to service_ok()
...;
> "domain logons is true.\n"));
>
> if (Globals.security == SEC_SHARE)
> DEBUG(0,( "WARNING: security should be domain if "
> "domain logons is true.\n"));
> else if (Globals.security == SEC_USER
> || Globals.security == SEC_SERVER)
> DEBUG(0,( "NOTICE: security = user or server will only "
> "support domain logons from Windows 95 and 98, not NT.\n"));
> }
>
> } /* End of globals. */
>
>
> /* Now do per-service options, starting with ERRORs. */
> /*...