search for: sdtk

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sdtk".

Did you mean: sdk
2011 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Build LLVM as a DLL on Windows x86
> >> GNU make is essential to msys build. I guess msysdtk would have it. > > > > I could find a copy of msysDTK at > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Other/Unsupported/MSYS/msy > > sDTK/, but not only is the 'latest' version a very old version > > (2003!), but once installed I couldn't find a cop...
2011 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Build LLVM as a DLL on Windows x86
"Alan Garny" <agarny at hellix.com> writes: >> GNU make is essential to msys build. I guess msysdtk would have it. > > I could find a copy of msysDTK at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Other/Unsupported/MSYS/msysDTK/, > but not only is the 'latest' version a very old version (2003!), but once > installed I couldn't find a copy of gmake in it. msysDTK is *...
2011 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Build LLVM as a DLL on Windows x86
...lto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Alan Garny > Sent: 14 November 2011 16:07 > To: 'Óscar Fuentes' > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Build LLVM as a DLL on Windows x86 > > > >> GNU make is essential to msys build. I guess msysdtk would have it. > > > > > > I could find a copy of msysDTK at > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Other/Unsupported/MSYS/msy > > > sDTK/, but not only is the 'latest' version a very old version > > > (2003!), but once...
2011 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Build LLVM as a DLL on Windows x86
...binutils?), but make. I imagine it shouldn't make any > difference.? > > Whatever the case, and as mentioned earlier, even though I do get a > > (~15MB > > big) DLL, it doesn't contain any (exported) functions. > > GNU make is essential to msys build. I guess msysdtk would have it. I could find a copy of msysDTK at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Other/Unsupported/MSYS/msysDTK/, but not only is the 'latest' version a very old version (2003!), but once installed I couldn't find a copy of gmake in it. > > Otherwise, I tried the ab...