Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sdnp".
Did you mean:
sdn
2001 Aug 31
2
Probit model
...I got a problem to analyze with probit model. What package contains the algorithm to do probit model.
Lawrence N.M Kazembe
Mathematical Sciences Department
Chancellor College
University of Malawi
P.O. Box 280
Zomba
Malawi
Tel: (265) 524 222 ext 284
Fax: (265) 524 046
e-mail: lkazembe at chirunga.sdnp.org.mw
url: kazembe.cjb.net
kazembe.tsx.org
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body&quo...
2006 Oct 05
1
[LLVMdev] The meaning of SDNPHasChain
...mp without this property. PCC defines PCCvcmp and PCCvcmp_o also
without this property. In Sparc backend SPcmpicc is also not using it.
But X86cmp does for some reason. I'm trying to understand if I need it
for my backend or not.
It would be also interesting to get some information about other SDNP-*
SelectionDAG node properties, e.g. SDNPOutFlag, SDNPInFlag,
SDNPOptInFlag and their purpose.
-Roman
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
2006 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] Questions about instruction selection and instruction definitions
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote:
>> Check out how the sparc or powerpc backends handle this. They lower
>> to a
>> select_cc pseudo-op that expands to an if/then/else control flow.
>
> Thanks! The hint about a pseudo-op was really good. After I realized how
> it works, I started the implementation of SELECT_CC using this approach.
> Hopefully, I can
2006 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] Questions about instruction selection and instruction definitions
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote:
> >> You can add the line
> >> setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT, MVT::i32, Expand);
> >> to the constructor of you TargetLowering class. See the current
> >> backend for an example.
> >
> > I actually tried it first. But then if, I remember correctly,
> SELECT
> > nodes were expanded into