search for: sdl1

Hallo, linux-btrfs, I''ve (once again) tried "add" and "delete". First, with 3 devices (partitions): mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 /dev/sdm1 Mounted (to /mnt/btr), filled with about 100 GByte data. Then btrfs device add /dev/sdj1 /mnt/btr results in # show Label: none uuid: 6bd7d4df-e133-47d1-9b19-3c7565428770 Total devices 4 FS bytes used 100.44GB devid 3 size 68.37GB used 44.95GB path /dev/sdm1 devid 2 size...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97065 Bug ID: 97065 Summary: memory leak under Xwayland with old sdl1 applications Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Rep...

...entOS 6.6 Server with 13 disks in a RAID 6. Some weeks ago, i upgraded it to 17 disks, two of them configured as spare. The reshape worked like normal in the beginning. But at 69% it stopped. md2 : active raid6 sdj1[0] sdg1[18](S) sdh1[2] sdi1[5] sdm1[15] sds1[12] sdr1[14] sdk1[9] sdo1[6] sdn1[13] sdl1[8] sdd1[20] sdf1[19] sdq1[16] sdb1[10] sde1[17](S) sdc1[21] 19533803520 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 1024k chunk, algorithm 2 [15/15] [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] [=============>.......] reshape = 69.0% (1347861324/1953380352) finish=46103134.8min speed=0K/sec I already tried to stop the raid an...

...End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux .... I go about creating the array as follows # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md3 --level=6 --raid-devices=10 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdi1 /dev/sdj1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K mdadm: size set to 1953511936K Continue creating array? As you can see mdadm sets the size to 1.9T. Looking around there was this limitation on older versions of mdadm if they are the 32 bit version. I am using the 64 bit...

...ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sde1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdf1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdg1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdh1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdi1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdj1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdk1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdl1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdm1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdn1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdo1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdp1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdq1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdr1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /de...

...o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/sdh1 ocfs2 o2cb 3A88FC23DBC34233BB175B056BC744A1 cluster /dev/sdi1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/sdj1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/sdk1 ocfs2 o2cb 3A88FC23DBC34233BB175B056BC744A1 cluster /dev/sdl1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/sdm1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/mapper/san_lun2p1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/mapper/san_lun1p1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/mapper/san_lun0p1 ocfs2 o2cb 3...

Are there any plans to implement SDL2 support for libtheora? I've searched the internet for patches and I couldn't really find anything. I modified some of the files in libtheora-1.1.1 to use the SDL2 library instead of the SDL library. I'm pretty sure I did it wrong though. It compiles successfully. I was hoping someone else had done something similarly so I could compare my

.../dev/sdg1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdh1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdi1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdj1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdk1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.47 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdl1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.47 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdm1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdn1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdo1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdp1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdq1 VG...

CentOS 6.3, x86_64. I have noticed when building a new software RAID-6 array on CentOS 6.3 that the mismatch_cnt grows monotonically while the array is building: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md11 : active raid6 sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0] 3904890880 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not

My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of situation? Paras -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

.../dev/sdi1 raid-disk 6 device /dev/sdj1 raid-disk 7 device /dev/sdk1 raid-disk 8 device /dev/sdl1 raid-disk 9 device /dev/sdm1 raid-disk 10 device /dev/sdn1 raid-disk 11 raiddev /dev/md1 raid-level 1 p...

I have trouble finding definitive information about this. I am considering the use of SME 7.5.1 (centOS based) for my server needs, but I do want to use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse implementation and unclear hints that there is another way. Phoronix reported that http://kqinfotech.com/ would release some form of ZFS for the kernel but I have found nothing.