search for: sdf1

...o start rsync is: /usr/bin/rsync -aXn --stats --delete --iconv=iso8859-2,utf-8 --link-dest=../1 --password-file /root/rsync/rsync.backup.cred --filter='. /root/rsync/system.exclude' / backup at 10.1.2.6::vlana/0 vlana module on the remote machine is configured as: [vlana] path = /mnt/sdf1/vlana comment = Backup space for Vlana read only = false fake super = false uid = root auth users = backup secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets charset = utf8 when the remote rsync starts it does does: chroot("/mnt/sdf1/vlana") = 0 chdir("/&q...

Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.

...1,8T 31% /srv/dev-disk-by-label-Big5 /dev/sdd2 ext4 1,8T 68M 1,7T 1% /srv/dev-disk-by-label-Big5_NoSnapraid /dev/sdf1 btrfs 7,3T 7,1T 196G 98% /srv/dev-disk-by-label-DataPool1 /dev/sdf1...

...ause of the problem. Accessing the directory in debug mode seems to work fine eg this command will hang my session [root@jic55124 databases]# ls -l /common/users/cbu/vigourom Whereas this works fine [root@jic55124 databases]# echo "ls -l /users/cbu/vigourom" | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdf1 25447960 drwxr-xr-x 33 2522 2004 4096 10-Jan-2008 16:30 . 25447672 drwxr-xr-x 5 3773 2004 4096 30-Nov-2007 14:27 .. 25447961 drwx------ 2 2522 2004 4096 1-Aug-2007 12:06 .ssh 25447963 -rw-r--r--...

...ause of the problem. Accessing the directory in debug mode seems to work fine eg this command will hang my session [root@jic55124 databases]# ls -l /common/users/cbu/vigourom Whereas this works fine [root@jic55124 databases]# echo "ls -l /users/cbu/vigourom" | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdf1 25447960 drwxr-xr-x 33 2522 2004 4096 10-Jan-2008 16:30 . 25447672 drwxr-xr-x 5 3773 2004 4096 30-Nov-2007 14:27 .. 25447961 drwx------ 2 2522 2004 4096 1-Aug-2007 12:06 .ssh 25447963 -rw-r--r--...

...% /bricks/sdc1 /dev/sdd1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 683G? 6.7T? 10% /bricks/sdd1 /dev/sdd1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 683G? 6.7T? 10% /bricks/sdd1 /dev/sde1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 657G? 6.7T?? 9% /bricks/sde1 /dev/sde1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 658G? 6.7T?? 9% /bricks/sde1 /dev/sdf1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 711G? 6.6T? 10% /bricks/sdf1 /dev/sdf1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 711G? 6.6T? 10% /bricks/sdf1 /dev/sdg1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 756G? 6.6T? 11% /bricks/sdg1 /dev/sdg1????????????????????????? 7.3T? 756G? 6.6T? 11% /bricks/sdg1 /dev/sdh1????????????????????...

...an invalid partition table or that they can't be mounted. e.g.: fdisk -l /dev/sdf Disk /dev/sdf: 53.6 GByte, 53687091200 Byte 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 51200 cylinders Einheiten = Zylinder von 2048 ? 512 = 1048576 Bytes Ger?t boot. Anfang Ende Bl?cke Id System /dev/sdf1 1 51200 52428784 83 Linux fdisk -l /dev/sdf1 Disk /dev/sdf1: 53.6 GByte, 53687074816 Byte 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 51199 cylinders Einheiten = Zylinder von 2048 ? 512 = 1048576 Bytes Disk /dev/sdf1 doesn't contain a valid partition table mount -t ext3 /dev/sdf...

Hi, I have two dataframes one with 144 rows and 160 columns (SDF1) and one with 12 rows and 160 columns (SDF2). Now I'm trying to divide rows 1:12 with SDF2, rows 13:24 with SDF2, rows 25:36 with SDF 2, . In S-Plus the following code works fine: DFS = SDF1[1:144,1:60] / as.vector(SDF2[1:12,1:160]) but in R when I try to implement the formula I get...

...is the only numeric entry, for ID=a and by 5 for ID=b. I worked out the solution but could not replace the results in the split lists. Original dataframe , df1 ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE NA 3 a ac FALSE NA 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE NA Sdf1 $a ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE NA 3 a ac FALSE NA $b ID ID_2 Firist Value 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE NA Desired results ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE 2 3 a ac FALSE 2 $b ID ID_2 Firist Value 4 b...

I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] EK On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all-- > > I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given > there which was a long UDF. I thought why canno...

Hi, I have a dataframe SDF1 that looks like this: Char1 Char2 Char 3 W.2007.02 W.2007.09 W.2007.16 W.2008.13 A C1 F1 F2 F3 A C2 F4 B C3 F5 F6 I have another dataframe SDF2 with 163 cols that has the foll...

...WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU General Public Licence for details. BLS #uname -a Linux gview.myfakedomain.nett 2.6.26.1 #1 SMP Sat Aug 2 15:03:02 ICT 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux BLS #rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd/source . sending incremental file list source/kernel/kernelpack2/ deleting source/kernel/kernelpack2/patch-2.6.26.1.bz2.sign deleting source/kernel/kernelpack2/patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 deleting source/kernel/kernelpack2/config-2.6.26.1.smp64 deleting source/kernel/kernelpack2/config-2.6.26.1.smp dele...

...nd a mistake later. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but >i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution >sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] >sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] > >EK > >On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all-- >> >> I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given >> there which...

...e my brevity. >> >> On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but >>> i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution >>> sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] >>> sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] >>> >>> EK >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all-- >>>> >>>> I stu...

...? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F) sdg1[3] sde1[1] sdd1[0] 1949480960 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 near-copies [4/3] [UU_U] bitmap: 15/15 pages [60KB], 65536KB chunk smartctl reports this for sdf: 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 1 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x00...

...Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >> I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but >> i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution >> sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] >> sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] >> >> EK >> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all-- >>> >>> I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the...

Hello list users. I am trying to create an ocfs filesystem but when I execute the command says the following thing to me: rac01:~ # mkfs.ocfs -b 128 -g oinstall -u oracle -L ocfs_pruebas -m /opt/oracle/oradata/OCFS -p 755 /dev/sdf1 Error opening device /dev/raw/raw41. Not a directory But it isn't a raw device. Any one know why it search for a raw device ? Thanks <DIV><FONT size="1"> ============================================================================ This e-mail message and any attached fi...

...bytes 102 heads, 38 sectors/track, 4033 cylinders Units = cylinders of 3876 * 512 = 1984512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xc3072e18 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdf1 3 4034 7813184 7 HPFS/NTFS mount -t ntfs /dev/sdf1 /mnt/usb gives: NTFS signature is missing. Failed to mount '/dev/sdf1': Invalid argument The device '/dev/sdf1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk in...

...gt;> On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> >wrote: >>>> >>>> I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, >but >>>> i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution >>>> sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] >>>> sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] >>>> >>>> EK >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> >wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all-- >&gt...

...mdadm --assemble --force -v /dev/md0 /dev/sd[cefgdh]1 mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0 mdadm: /dev/sdc1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0. mdadm: /dev/sdd1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1. mdadm: /dev/sde1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 2. mdadm: /dev/sdf1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 3. mdadm: /dev/sdg1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 4. mdadm: /dev/sdh1 is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1. mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 1 of /dev/md0 mdadm: added /dev/sde1 to /dev/md0 as 2 mdadm: added /dev/sdf1 to /dev/md0...