search for: sda5

...autorun ... md: considering sdb7 ... md: adding sdb7 ... md: sdb6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb3 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb2 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdb7 md: adding sda7 ... md: sda6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda3 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda2 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda1 has different UUID to sdb7 md: created md5 md: bind<sda7> md: bind<sdb7> md: running: <sdb7><sda7> raid1: raid set md5 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: considering s...

...0 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 128.00 25.60 0.03 3.40 0.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 sdb 0.00 27.80 0.00 48.20 0.00 318.40 13.21 0.43 8.84 0.00 8.84 1.99 9.60 iodump shows similar results, where sdb is the data disk, sda7 the journal and sda5 the root. btrfs root@s-brick-003:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump root@s-brick-003:~# while true; do sleep 1; dmesg -c; done | perl /usr/local/bin/iodump ^C# Caught SIGINT. TASK PID TOTAL READ WRITE DIRTY DEVICES btrfs-submit-0 8321 28040...

Hi, I''m hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with loop, encryption etc. # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using error checking /dev/sda5 mount status Is there something I can do to resolve this? Thank you L...

Hi, guys. I''m trying to use physical disks as virtual disks in HVM domains. But I couldn''t. I''m using cs10508 of xen-unstable.hg. When I use disk = [ ''phy:sda5,ioemu:hda,w'' ] in conf file, creating HVM domain says, I need to use ''file'' modifier if I use ''ioemu''. So, I changed it to disk = [ ''phy:sda5,hda,w'' ]. But HVM window doesn''t pop up. Did you guys solve this problem? Can'&...

...wn under high load with very many small files. Basically, I have around 3.5 - 4 million files on this filesystem. New files are being written to the FS all the time, until I get to 9-11 mln small files (35k on average). at some point I get the following in dmesg: [2870477.695512] Filesystem "sda5": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.? Caller 0xffffffff8826bb7d [2870477.695558] [2870477.695559] Call Trace: [2870477.695611]? [<ffffffff88262c28>] :xfs:xfs_trans_cancel+0x5b/0xfe [2870477.695643]? [<ffffffff8826bb7d>] :xfs:xfs_mkdir+0x57c...

...running Gentoo and have compiled the 2.6.31 kernel, enabling btrfs. Now I have 2 partitions (on 2 different sata disks) that are free for me to play with, each about 375 gb in size. I wanted to create a "raid1" volume using these two partitions, so I did: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5 # mount /dev/sda5 /btrfs and everything seems fine. Now what I find strange is that everything looks like a raid0 was created, not a raid1: $ df -h /btrfs/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5 684G 72G 612G 11% /btrfs What am I doing (or u...

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under dom0 there is no error message. Same if under 32 or 64 bit. My guess is it''s conf...

...looks like: [root@six xen-domains]# cat xen-export.conf kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" memory = 128 name = "six-xenolinux" nics = 1 ip = "192.168.1.207" netmask=get_current_ipmask() gateway=get_current_ipgw() hostname="six-xenolinux" disk = [''phy:sda5,sda5,w''] root = "/dev/sda5 ro/" # Kernel image file. kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11.10-xenU" # Optional ramdisk. ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.11.10-xenU.img" =============================== DomainU fstab looks like: [root@six xen-domains]# cat /export/etc/fstab...

...ms with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on boot that >> >> fsck.ext3: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) (/dev/sda5) >> *fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! [fail] > > you can list the features with the command "tune2fs -l /dev/sda5" and > toggle features too (read the man page). It's most likely the > dir_index feature... > Thanks Peter for the prod in the right direction...

...rse_mountable = <struct guestfs_internal_mountable *> libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device "/dev/sda3" libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device = 0 libguestfs: trace: mount_ro "/dev/sda3" "/" libguestfs: trace: mount_ro = -1 (error) libguestfs: trace: vfs_type "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace: vfs_type = "ntfs" libguestfs: trace: internal_parse_mountable "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace: internal_parse_mountable = <struct guestfs_internal_mountable *> libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace: is_whole_devic...

SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series CPU0: Intel® Core(TM) i7-2820QM CPU @ 2.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 2a, stepping: 07) 8GB RAM (quite heavily tested, not recently, with several days of memtest) kernel 3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 running on baremetal btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19.x86_64 Today I did a scrub on a btrfs volume, with no message or errors in console or dmesg or journal. Immediately after

Hi A box was installed with the majority of the free space in /home but i actually want this to be available to /opt. My fstab had /home looking like this LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 I umounted /home and changed the fstab to look like this /dev/sda5 /opt ext3 defaults 1 2 and then mounted /opt. All works fine. My question is, is this the 'correct' way to do something like this or should i stick to 'LABEL' ? I wonder as i'm not sure where the label tag gets set and when i see the b...

...; rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem. Thanks for the response . . Hmm . . but the drive that goes read-only is being read FROM not TO . . it is hard to see how that should be an issue? The backstory is that a relatively recent internal 8TB Seagate Barracuda had its 7.2TB sda5 (home) partition corrupted - which itself was suspicious but not impossible of course - so I had to switch temporarily to an external USB 4TB drive (which was a backup drive and was already up-to-date) for /home. So now this exercise is rsyncing back to a NEW internal 8TB Seagate Barracuda (sd...

Just got Wine 1.1.13 on Ubuntu 8.10 tried to map D: to my Windows partition /dev/sda5 /media/DATA but Wine wouldn't keep my choice and reverts to /media/cdrom0. Found out that permissions for ~/.wine/dosdevices/d: were root only and couldn't change them. So I deleted d: & d:: and made new symbolic links $ sudo rm -r /home/me/.wine/dosdevices/d* $ ln -s /media/DATA /...

...t does boot a couple of times, but i guess that it is from the installation image. created domU using the virtual machine manager under gnome. name: vistaUltimate32 fully virtualized using an ISO on the same server os type = windows os variant = microsoft windows vista normal disk partition = /dev/sda5 shared physical device = peth0 (bridge eth0) 1 cpu, 768MB RAM tried the following as well 1.left /dev/sda5 to be ext3, did not repartition the drive or format it via the vista installer. 3.left /dev/sda5 to be ext3, did repartition the drive and formated it via the vista installer. 4.tried to form...

I have seen this happen a number of times: Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: Aborting journal on device sda5. Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 last message repeated 6 times Jun 13 13:58:18 n202 kernel: ext3_abort ca...

.../dev/sda3: >>> partition data: 3 210763776-420478975 (209715200 bytes) >>> bootable: false >>> partition ID: 0x5 >>> content: extended partition >>> label: (none) >>> GUID: (none) >>> *partition type: extended* >>> /dev/sda5: >>> partition data: 5 211812352-222298111 (10485760 bytes) >>> bootable: false >>> partition ID: 0x83 >>> content: unknown data >>> label: (none) >>> GUID: (none) >>> *partition type: logical* >>> >>> As we cou...

I want to config one 50T OST stroage, is it okay? Since I know that the limitation of ext3 is 1XT. Thnaks

...ve a xen virtual machine, and i'' d like to assign cdrw device to it. My physical device on domain0 is /dev/hda, and in the configuration file i'' ve this: disk = [ ''phy:vg0/vx-disk,sda1,w'', ''phy:vg0/vx-swap,sda2,w'', ''phy:vg0/vx-data,sda5,w'' ] I'' ve tried to assign the cdrom to it in many ways i found in different examples, but none of them worked. I tried to load the cdrom, and ide-generic module, and create the device (with mknod), but didn'' t help. Please help me to solve this problem. Many thanks....

...rated on Tue Feb 12 19:33:17 IST 2008 kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16.33-xen" memory = 256 extra = "fastboot" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.16.33-xen.img" disk = [''phy:vg/fedora,sda6,w'',''phy:vg/compswap,sda7,w'', ''phy:vg/modules,sda5,r''] name = "fedora.compnode.grid" root = "/dev/sda6 ro" vif=[''bridge=xenbr0''] The logical volumes look like [root@g40 ~]# lvs LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Copy% compswap vg -wi-ao 1.00G fedora vg -wi-ao 10.00G modu...