search for: sda5

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 272 matches for "sda5".

Did you mean: sda
2006 Apr 02
2
raid setup
...autorun ... md: considering sdb7 ... md: adding sdb7 ... md: sdb6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb3 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb2 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdb7 md: adding sda7 ... md: sda6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda3 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda2 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda1 has different UUID to sdb7 md: created md5 md: bind<sda7> md: bind<sdb7> md: running: <sdb7><sda7> raid1: raid set md5 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: considering s...
2011 Oct 09
1
Btrfs High IO-Wait
...0 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 128.00 25.60 0.03 3.40 0.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 sdb 0.00 27.80 0.00 48.20 0.00 318.40 13.21 0.43 8.84 0.00 8.84 1.99 9.60 iodump shows similar results, where sdb is the data disk, sda7 the journal and sda5 the root. btrfs root@s-brick-003:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump root@s-brick-003:~# while true; do sleep 1; dmesg -c; done | perl /usr/local/bin/iodump ^C# Caught SIGINT. TASK PID TOTAL READ WRITE DIRTY DEVICES btrfs...
2011 Feb 08
10
mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status
Hi, I''m hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with loop, encryption etc. # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using error checking /dev/sda5 mount status Is there something I can do to res...
2014 Jul 01
3
corruption of in-memory data detected (xfs)
...wn under high load with very many small files. Basically, I have around 3.5 - 4 million files on this filesystem. New files are being written to the FS all the time, until I get to 9-11 mln small files (35k on average). at some point I get the following in dmesg: [2870477.695512] Filesystem "sda5": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.? Caller 0xffffffff8826bb7d [2870477.695558] [2870477.695559] Call Trace: [2870477.695611]? [<ffffffff88262c28>] :xfs:xfs_trans_cancel+0x5b/0xfe [2870477.695643]? [<ffffffff8826bb7d>] :xfs:xfs...
2009 Nov 27
5
unexpected raid1 behavior?
...Gentoo and have compiled the 2.6.31 kernel, enabling btrfs. Now I have 2 partitions (on 2 different sata disks) that are free for me to play with, each about 375 gb in size. I wanted to create a "raid1" volume using these two partitions, so I did: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5 # mount /dev/sda5 /btrfs and everything seems fine. Now what I find strange is that everything looks like a raid0 was created, not a raid1: $ df -h /btrfs/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5 684G 72G 612...
2007 Oct 23
3
xfs problems with xen3.1 on domu
Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under dom0 there is no error message. Same if under 32 or 64 bit. My guess is it''s conf...
2006 Jan 26
1
Ext3 filesystem access after downgrade from v4.2 to v3.6 [SOLVED]
...Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on boot that >> >> fsck.ext3: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) (/dev/sda5) >> *fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! [fail] > > you can list the features with the command "tune2fs -l /dev/sda5" and > toggle features too (read the man page). It's most likely the > dir_index feature... > Thanks Peter for the prod in the right d...
2014 Sep 27
2
Re: Virt-v2v conversion issue
...uestfs_internal_mountable *> libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device "/dev/sda3" libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device = 0 libguestfs: trace: mount_ro "/dev/sda3" "/" libguestfs: trace: mount_ro = -1 (error) libguestfs: trace: vfs_type "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace: vfs_type = "ntfs" libguestfs: trace: internal_parse_mountable "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace: internal_parse_mountable = <struct guestfs_internal_mountable *> libguestfs: trace: is_whole_device "/dev/sda5" libguestfs: trace...
2013 Sep 23
12
balance induced csum errors
SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series CPU0: IntelĀ® Core(TM) i7-2820QM CPU @ 2.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 2a, stepping: 07) 8GB RAM (quite heavily tested, not recently, with several days of memtest) kernel 3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 running on baremetal btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19.x86_64 Today I did a scrub on a btrfs volume, with no message or errors in console or dmesg or journal. Immediately after
2006 May 08
2
Changing mount point - 4.3
...e majority of the free space in /home but i actually want this to be available to /opt. My fstab had /home looking like this LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 I umounted /home and changed the fstab to look like this /dev/sda5 /opt ext3 defaults 1 2 and then mounted /opt. All works fine. My question is, is this the 'correct' way to do something like this or should i stick to 'LABEL' ? I wonder as i'm not sure where the label tag gets set and when i se...
2009 Jan 29
2
Drive Mapping Problem & solution
Just got Wine 1.1.13 on Ubuntu 8.10 tried to map D: to my Windows partition /dev/sda5 /media/DATA but Wine wouldn't keep my choice and reverts to /media/cdrom0. Found out that permissions for ~/.wine/dosdevices/d: were root only and couldn't change them. So I deleted d: & d:: and made new symbolic links $ sudo rm -r /home/me/.wi...
2008 May 21
5
can not install vista ultimate 32 bit
...oot a couple of times, but i guess that it is from the installation image. created domU using the virtual machine manager under gnome. name: vistaUltimate32 fully virtualized using an ISO on the same server os type = windows os variant = microsoft windows vista normal disk partition = /dev/sda5 shared physical device = peth0 (bridge eth0) 1 cpu, 768MB RAM tried the following as well 1.left /dev/sda5 to be ext3, did not repartition the drive or format it via the vista installer. 3.left /dev/sda5 to be ext3, did repartition the drive and formated it via the vista installer....
2005 Jun 14
1
bad inode number followed by ext3_abort and remount readonly
I have seen this happen a number of times: Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: Aborting journal on device sda5. Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 last message repeated 6 times Jun 13 13:58:18 n202 kernel: ext3_abort ca...
2015 May 08
1
Re: [PATCH 00/10] virt-resize: add support for resizing MBR logical partitions
...a3: >>> partition data: 3 210763776-420478975 (209715200 bytes) >>> bootable: false >>> partition ID: 0x5 >>> content: extended partition >>> label: (none) >>> GUID: (none) >>> *partition type: extended* >>> /dev/sda5: >>> partition data: 5 211812352-222298111 (10485760 bytes) >>> bootable: false >>> partition ID: 0x83 >>> content: unknown data >>> label: (none) >>> GUID: (none) >>> *partition type: logical* >>> >>> As we cou...
2006 May 19
2
Limitation of storage size.
I want to config one 50T OST stroage, is it okay? Since I know that the limitation of ext3 is 1XT. Thnaks
2008 Feb 12
4
Reg Disk space in guest domain with fedora img
...IST 2008 kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16.33-xen" memory = 256 extra = "fastboot" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.16.33-xen.img" disk = [''phy:vg/fedora,sda6,w'',''phy:vg/compswap,sda7,w'', ''phy:vg/modules,sda5,r''] name = "fedora.compnode.grid" root = "/dev/sda6 ro" vif=[''bridge=xenbr0''] The logical volumes look like [root@g40 ~]# lvs LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Copy% compswap vg -wi-ao 1.00G fedora vg -wi-ao 10.00...
2010 Oct 21
3
Bug? Mount and fstab
...7;gluster ext3 defaults 0 1 /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs.vol /pifs/ glusterfs defaults 0 0 [root at vm-container-0-0 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 16G 2.6G 12G 18% / /dev/sda5 883G 35G 803G 5% /state/partition1 /dev/sda2 3.8G 121M 3.5G 4% /var tmpfs 7.7G 0 7.7G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sdb1 917G 200M 871G 1% /gluster none 7.7G 104K 7.7G 1% /var...
2012 Oct 26
4
Can't replace a faulty disk of raid1
...tioned, rebooted the system, and made the partition grow: "btrfs fi resize 3:max /" # btrfs fi show Label: ''mainbtrfs'' uuid: 2ebf9e90-104c-47a4-adff-fada1ce3b682 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 445.06GB devid 1 size 539.95GB used 539.95GB path /dev/sda5 devid 3 size 539.95GB used 96.90GB path /dev/sdb1 <= New disk *** Some devices missing The size appeared fine (I checked it at byte-amount level, to ensure I have not set 4K smaller for example). But attempting the ''btrfs device delete missing /'' again...
2015 Jun 02
0
[PATCH 3/3] Add tests for CoreOS
...ml b/inspector/expected-coreos.img.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..723a853 --- /dev/null +++ b/inspector/expected-coreos.img.xml @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +<?xml version="1.0"?> +<operatingsystems> + <operatingsystem> + <root>/dev/sda5</root> + <name>linux</name> + <distro>coreos</distro> + <product_name>CoreOS 647.0.0</product_name> + <major_version>647</major_version> + <minor_version>0</minor_version> + <hostname>c...
2009 Nov 05
7
Unexpected ENOSPC on a SSD-drive after day of uptime, kernel 2.6.32-rc5
I''ve just finished installing onto an OCZ Agilent v2 SSD with btrfs as filesystem. However to my surprise I''ve hit an ENOSPC condition one one of the partitions within less than a day of uptime, while the filesystem on that partition only reported 50% to be in use, which is far from the 75% limit people mention on the ML. Note that this occurs using a vanilla 2.6.32-rc5 kernel