search for: scrutinized

Hi Duncan, Martin Here's a small patch that fixes bug 15199 reported at: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15199 I was able to reproduce the bug as Duncan had outlined just fine, but I did notice that when we debug(f), the problem went away. I later realized that f(1,,3) behaved correctly the first time it was executed, but misbehaved as documented on subsequent calls.

A very special thanks to H. Peter for finding the time to [at least partially, if not wholly] scrutinize and merge the El Torito emulation code for MEMDISK! I'd like to ask that those who've previously used the stale MEMDISK-ISO switch to this latest[1] MEMDISK proper and report any failures. Gert, I believe this version addresses the PloP .ISO trouble you reported. Could you

Hi everyone, Do you if there a way to display a certain ressource attribut. For instance, I want to display the ''require'' of the User[''test''] Regards, JM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

...of defense, how do you all feel about the "TCP wrappers" functionality in libwrap? As I understand it, the hosts.allow and hosts.deny files offer the same level of granularity that the NUT ACL functionality provided, but with the advantage of a more well-known (and hopefully well-scrutinized) codebase. Many Linux distributions have shipped libwrap for years, and it should be fairly easy to stub out the glue code if people do not want to bother with libwrap. Thoughts? -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail

...mmunity. As I call it, it's the "Linux Quiz Show" and many people squabble over many things, but apparently if IBM does the same thing or even worse, people assume they can't be bad. SCO v. IBM resulted because of two companies - or bigger than the other. Sun has been repeatedly scrutinized for things that IBM does and few (outside of Linus and other developers) seem to question. Whatever people get all hussy about, the media reports, even if its levied unevenly. And boy to some Linux people seem to get all so political and "anti" all the time. > and RedHat's attempt...

Not sure if this document will be shown to any dtrace users but here is a link if you want to comment on it http://sources.redhat.com/systemtap/wiki/SystemtapDtraceComparison I have went line by line and commented on its content and in accuracies and posted it both to the systemtap email list and my blog, you can see the blogged version at

Hi, I am running a dovecot server and have set up an external monitoring, where every five minutes a login with SSL on port 993 is done. I usually get once a day an error "connection reset by peer - SSL connect", which goes away until the next monitor is executed. Initially I thought that raising the mail_max_userip_connections in protocol imap in 20-imap.conf to 256 should do the

Hi there, With the new scrutinization by auditors on account policies and auditing, how can Samba be SOX compliant? Using 3.0.14a-sernet on Suse 9.1 - ldapsam Specifically, a couple of things seem to be lacking: 1) Logon/Logoff times are not being recorded The last logon time recorded in my ldap entries are pre-nt4 migration. 2) Do the Audit Policy values in user manager have any effect? Are

I've prepared a preliminary patch with the intention of implementing PPC-EABI subtarget features for applications that run in a standalone embedded environment. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26344 The most significant difference compared with the SVR4 ABI is the use of SDA (small data area). This allows full-word constants and data to be grouped into small-data sections accessed using relocated

...see the IR changing the semantics throughout the pipeline, since while the compiler proceeds, the type of transformations done also change. But I have to say that my understanding of LLVM after CGP is very limited. I was not aware of the code reuse from IR-level analyses. I agree this needs to be scrutinized carefully. Alternatively, we can just introduce freeze and pay the price (likely low anyway). Regarding undef at MI level, we are not proposing any change. I don't see any reason right now to change it since it seems that optimizations at MI level are fine with just having undef. There's...

Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC maintainers: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26344 It's now rebased for the latest master commits, `check-all` test results match those of the upstream base. There is also a clang driver patch, extending PPC target support for the `-G` flag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26345 And lld patch implementing the _SDA_BASE_ symbols and includes an

Hello, I''m new to puppet and am getting a puppet server setup with puppet dashboard. I have the puppet server and puppet dashboard (Apache/Passenger) setup and working well with 60+ test nodes working as expected. Only problem is that I have this one error in the logs which I can''t figure out. Jan 26 17:09:41 ppt01 puppet-agent[27357]: Could not retrieve catalog from remote

We're seeking interns for the summer of 2014 here at Barron's the Dow Jones newsweekly that's searched out good investments and financial frauds since 1921, when our founder exposed Charles Ponzi. We're at the center of the financial world in New York and can pay a bit of a stipend to cover the city's high living costs. Here's the blurb: Do some good. Intern at

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Andersen via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:39:53 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [MC] Target-Independent Small Data Section Handling > > Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC > maintainers:

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

I have a humongous csv file containing census data, far too big to read into RAM. I have been trying to extract individual columns from this file using the colbycol package. This works for certain subsets of the columns, but not for others. I have not yet been able to precisely identify the problem columns, as there are 731 columns and running colbycol on the file on my old slow machine takes

Thanks for the report, I've fixed 15199 in the AST interpreter in 72664, I will fix it in the byte-code interpreter as well. If you ever needed to disable the JIT, there is API for that, see ?compiler. Note though that by disabling the JIT you won't disable the byte-code interpreter, because code also gets compiled when packages are installed or when the compiler is invoked

Hello, I'm having the following questionable behavior: > summary(m) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 1 13000 26280 25890 38550 50910 > max(m) [1] 50912 > typeof(m) [1] "integer" > class(m) [1] "integer" ...it seems to me like max() and summary(m)[6] ought to return the same number. Am I doing something wrong? I'm

It's not too early for statistically-adept students to think about underpaid, but life-altering, internships for the summer of 2012. In fact, after November 1st it may be too late to apply here at Barron's. This will be the second summer we've offered paid internships, which means that applicants can now poll the hapless folks who interned this past summer. Contact me, Bill Alpert, and