search for: scrappi

Hi, I'm trying to boot 64bit version of syslinux.efi through network. But booting is freezes with following message: Getting cached packets My IP is X.X.X.X the last file that was requested through tftp is syslinux.efi. I'm using precompiled binary from official syslinux-6.02.tar.gz. Here is the dump in ASCII - http://brom.in/dumps/syslinux-20131220.txt Any help is appreciated.

Okay guys, This is separate from my last few messages. Along with those attempts, I decided to migrate from pxelinux.0 to gpxelinux.0 in my existing setup. Admittedly I haven't tried previous gpxelinux.0's but I am willing to if someone thinks it would be useful. Everything works as expected with pxelinux.0 of the same version. With gpxelinux.0: TFTP Prefix: Trying to load:

Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems

As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?

Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same

Due to an issue I'm having with 7.x, and trying to track it down, I spent tonight getting my server setup to allow my to break into the debugger when it hangs, and hopefully dump core ... But, although I *think* I've got it all, I'm obviously missing something, as it isn't breaking ... First ... I'm running a proliant server, and when I connect via SSH to ILO on that

Morning... Just spent this evening getting printing setup off my FreeBSD machine (oh, how I love Solaris at these times *groan*)...got it now so that I can print directly from Netscape, color and graphics and all. The printer is an HP 560c. Now, I want to be able to print from my Windoze95 machine, and have samba setup for that, as well as file sharing. If I setup my Windoze machine such

Here's an odd question/request ... Right now, if you setup smb.conf with a [homes] section, anyone can connect and login to the server, as themselves, and mount their home directory. No probs there. Has anyone thought of, and possibly implemented, a means where that end user could change things for themselves to extend permissions on their directory? Basically, make a Win based utility

Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous* connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same time? the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ... I konw with the 'idle'

Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Marc G. Fournier

morning all ... I want to share a drive between two of my computers ... dont' want to deal with smbpasswd, so am just doing it as an open share with a host allow set to the computer that i want to share with ... smb.conf is setup nice and simple: [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.27.227.73 log file = /var/log/log.%m debug level = 3

G'day ... Altho it is rare, we are getting union_lookup panics on our server(s) ... as most on this list already know, we make heavy use of unionfs to share between jails, and I already know that this is the "kernel side" cause of the problem ... but ... From what I can tell, though, the "trigger" for the panic is pkg_delete ... if I build a jail'd environment,

Morning all ... 'K, this one is a first for me ... server crashed this aft and savecore wouldn't dump the resultant core: pluto# savecore -v /vm/crash dumplo = 4362141696 (8519808 * 512) savecore: warning: /kernel version mismatch: "FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Sat May 31 22:57:04 ADT 2003 " and " #(#(#(" savecore: reboot savecore: dump time is zero

Morning... Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no* password... The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server, running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ... I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva

I'm thinking of using jails to improve security on a server I am setting up. Specifically, I would like to put Apache/PHP in a jail, but I might like to set up 2-3 different jails for different purposes. I've found several examples showing how to set the jails up. My questions involve system requirements. Assuming plenty of disk space, 1GB ram and a dual processor PIII 1.13Ghz

Just went to look at that page, and all the dates are pre-'98 as far as "last updates" are concerned... Does anyone have a URL or anything that has testimonials of some sort? Trying to provide my boss with ammunication against another 'manager' who just sent around comments from a Novell mailing list about Samba... I'm curious about stuff like server/platform being run

G'day ... David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very heavily

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

I woke up to a frozen box this morning - it froze up a few more times before I got a handle on it. Basically, the box runs idle but refuses to do disk IO, or does it -very- slowly. Top shows processes stuck in 'ffsvget', 'inode', and 'vlruwk' state. I can get the box responsive again by setting sysctl kern.maxvnods=100000. It starts up with kern.maxnodes=36079. I

Hi dovecot developers and users, I recently upgraded my server running Arch Linux to dovecot 2.3.0, and I noticed some of my cron jobs started issuing me error messages. These cron jobs run as a non-root user associated with my mail account, and they use doveadm to tidy things up (ex. purging the trash, moving old mail in certain folders into the trash). The error message is: > Error: