search for: scientfic

...'ve never really understood how hiding those solutions behind a wall is a > good thing in/for the OpenSource world. Looks like I'm not alone :-) > A good thing is the ability for someone to be able to pay people actual money so that CentOS can actually exist. There is no CentOS (or Scientfic Linux or Oracle Linux) without RHEL. There is no RHEL if Red Hat can not make money. If one is not smart enough to support their own install .. the answer is .. buy RHEL. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signa...

Hi there, Is a web app always preferable to a ''real'' app? - or are there times when a real app should be used? I''m starting a new app and can''t decide which would be best. Is Ruby (not RoR) suitable for a real app? Chris. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...hiding those solutions behind a wall is >> a >> good thing in/for the OpenSource world. Looks like I'm not alone :-) >> > > A good thing is the ability for someone to be able to pay people actual > money so that CentOS can actually exist. There is no CentOS (or > Scientfic Linux or Oracle Linux) without RHEL. There is no RHEL if Red > Hat can not make money. And there is no RedHat if thousands of developers would not allow RedHat to consume their work for free. Creators of free software didn't build walls around their projects. Do you thinks it's a good...

<lots snipped> >The redhat access page comes up in both google and duckduckgo when I put >in the entire 4 lines of the error message.? You still have to login to >see the solution. >

...r target 'rbuild' failed >make[1]: *** [rbuild] Error 2 >Makefile:14: recipe for target 'all' failed >make: *** [all] Error 2 > >I still had to delete those lines in compat.c, so this build, were it >to have completed, is still subject to the non-conformance of >scientfic notation printing that was discussed earlier. > >Hin-tak, any suggestions for this error (and the compat.c for that >matter) that you, or any reader of this list, may have would be >greatly appreciated. > >Thank you! > >Avi > > >> ------------------------------ &...

...or 2 Makefile:104: recipe for target 'rbuild' failed make[1]: *** [rbuild] Error 2 Makefile:14: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 I still had to delete those lines in compat.c, so this build, were it to have completed, is still subject to the non-conformance of scientfic notation printing that was discussed earlier. Hin-tak, any suggestions for this error (and the compat.c for that matter) that you, or any reader of this list, may have would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Avi > ------------------------------ > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 2:01 PM GMT Henric...