search for: schedulur

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "schedulur".

Did you mean: scheduler
2009 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem seems to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is especially problematic because the code is either expecting a VirtualRegister or a RegisterSDNode...
2009 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to > have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during > Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem > seems > to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in > ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is > especially problematic because the code is either expecting a > VirtualRe...
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Other than not using debugging ('-g' and the like), not really. :-( I think that Devang is actively working on fixing this, though. It might not be too much longer. -bw On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > This did not seem to work, any other ideas? > > Thanks, > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at
2009 Jan 30
1
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
...:18 AM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to > have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during > Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem > seems > to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in > ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is > especially problematic because the code is either expecting a > VirtualRe...
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
This did not seem to work, any other ideas? Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Wendling Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:26 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why Don't generate debug info at this time (you can use "opt -strip-debug")?