Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "schedulur".
Did you mean:
scheduler
2009 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to
have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during
Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem seems
to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in
ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is
especially problematic because the code is either expecting a
VirtualRegister or a RegisterSDNode...
2009 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to
> have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during
> Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem
> seems
> to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in
> ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is
> especially problematic because the code is either expecting a
> VirtualRe...
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Other than not using debugging ('-g' and the like), not really. :-( I
think that Devang is actively working on fixing this, though. It might
not be too much longer.
-bw
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> This did not seem to work, any other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at
2009 Jan 30
1
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
...:18 AM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to
> have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during
> Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem
> seems
> to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in
> ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is
> especially problematic because the code is either expecting a
> VirtualRe...
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
This did not seem to work, any other ideas?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Bill Wendling
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:26 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Don't generate debug info at this time (you can use "opt
-strip-debug")?