Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "schedueling".
Did you mean:
schedualing
2006 Aug 10
0
Here''s the skinny.
...pec and writing very minimal code. That turned out to be a
good thing, because shortly after that they discovered Ruby. They got
all excited about the new possibilities and began building some really
(i mean really) cool stuff!
Our first deadline came and went and it became more obvious that
schedueling a completion date would be difficult. I started to ride
them a little harder. Looking for something tangeable. They wern''t
asking for money - instead they were doing other jobs. So I forced them
to take money, thinking it would make them more committed to my
deadlines. All it seem...
2012 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
On May 8, 2012, at 3:02 PM, dag at cray.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I've mentioned before we are doing some work on the LLVM scheduler to
> improve it. Specifically, we are working to get loads and stores to
> move past each other when possible.
>
> When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
> got a response about a MachineInstr
2012 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
On May 9, 2012, at 8:34 AM, dag at cray.com wrote:
> Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes:
>
>>> When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
>>> got a response about a MachineInstr scheduler and that that was the way
>>> of the LLVM future. Is that so? Is the ScheduleDAG going away?
>>
>> You sent a lengthy RFC
2012 May 09
5
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes:
>> When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
>> got a response about a MachineInstr scheduler and that that was the way
>> of the LLVM future. Is that so? Is the ScheduleDAG going away?
>
> You sent a lengthy RFC on Apr 20 that demonstrated you aren't
> following developments on trunk.
2012 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap
Hi everyone,
As I've mentioned before we are doing some work on the LLVM scheduler to
improve it. Specifically, we are working to get loads and stores to
move past each other when possible.
When I asked about enhancing scheduler heuristics a month or so ago, I
got a response about a MachineInstr scheduler and that that was the way
of the LLVM future. Is that so? Is the ScheduleDAG going
2006 Aug 09
29
HELP - My Programmers are AWOL !!
I hired a friend of a friend to build my company a fairly substantial
application. He quoted it, committed to it, and now says he has run out
of money.
I''ve offered him additional money/incentives ...twice. He continues to
commit, and then, ultimately not make his commitment.
I''m not sure what my options are.
Ideally, I would like to simply fire him and hire someone to