search for: schannel

Dear all, Do you have come acrross with this issue. My ss7 link get fluctuating. It use chan_ss7 version 1.0.95-beta. I have 8 E1s running on a DL380 server. This enable to have calls from sip to ss7 and vice versa. However ss7 links are not stable. linkset siuc, link l1, schannel 1, sls 0, NOT_ALIGNED, rx: 1, tx: 2/4, sentseq/lastack: 127/127, total 4034145216, 4031118560 linkset siuc, link l5, schannel 1, sls 1, INSERVICE, rx: 5, tx: 3/3, sentseq/lastack: 95/95, total 4030833616, 4028245568 ^[[A[root at localhost ~]# asterisk -rx "ss7 link status" linkset siuc, l...

..., and Samba implements the protocol, Samba is also vulnerable. However, since version 4.8 (released in March 2018), the default behaviour of Samba has been to insist on a secure netlogon channel, which is a sufficient fix against the known exploits. This default is equivalent to having 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. Therefore versions 4.8 and above are not vulnerable unless they have the smb.conf lines 'server schannel = no' or 'server schannel = auto'. Samba versions 4.7 and below are vulnerable unless they have 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. No...

..., and Samba implements the protocol, Samba is also vulnerable. However, since version 4.8 (released in March 2018), the default behaviour of Samba has been to insist on a secure netlogon channel, which is a sufficient fix against the known exploits. This default is equivalent to having 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. Therefore versions 4.8 and above are not vulnerable unless they have the smb.conf lines 'server schannel = no' or 'server schannel = auto'. Samba versions 4.7 and below are vulnerable unless they have 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. No...

Samba logs show many of these: [2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981) Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2 [2005/09/10 10:26:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981) Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2 [2005/09/10 11:26:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981) Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2...

...a-git/samba/st/w DNS: Faking nameserver skipping subunit (testscenarios not available) OPTIONS --configfile=$SMB_CONF_PATH --option='fss:sequence timeout=1' --maximum-runtime=$SELFTEST_MAXTIME --basedir=$SELFTEST_TMPDIR --format=subunit --option=torture:progress=no WARNING: The "server schannel" option is deprecated WARNING: The "server schannel" option is deprecated tdbsam_open: Converting version 0.0 database to version 4.0. tdbsam_convert_backup: updated /home/user/src/samba-git/samba/st/nt4_dc/private/passdb.tdb file. WARNING: The "server schannel" option is d...

4.0.6 with 3.6.12 file server Hi Ordinary users can connect fine: smbclient //oliva/users -Usteve2 Enter steve2's password: Domain=[HH3] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.9] smb: \> log: schannel_fetch_session_key_tdb: restored schannel info key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/OLIVA schannel_store_session_key_tdb: stored schannel info with key SECRETS/SCHANNEL/OLIVA auth_check_password_send: Checking password for unmapped user [HH3]\[steve2]@[\\HH16] auth_check_password_send: mapped user is: [HH3]\[steve2...

Thanks for the reply, Besides the problem with source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c, Good to hear that selftest is actively used, then do I understand it right that 'make test' should succeed? My bigger problem is that it failed with lots of errors. This must be a problem with my build, then, but since this is a fresh tarball I am a bit puzzled. I would appreciate some hint on

...= YES # zaptel.conf loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-31 ### ss7.conf [linkset-ennie] enabled => yes use_connect => yes enable_st => no hunting_policy => odd_lru subservice => auto context = default [link-l1] linkset => ennie channels => 1-15,17-31 schannel => 16 firstcic => 1 enabled => yes [link-l2] linkset => ennie channels => 1-31 schannel => firstcic => 33 enabled => yes [link-l3] linkset => ennie channels => 1-31 schannel => firstcic => 65 enabled => no [link-l4] linkset => ennie channels => 1-31 s...

Hi! I upgrade for Samba 4 8.2 my 3 DCs(no ore erro, and replication is ok with kcc), but msg about Squid with NTLM persist, and dont work more... May 18 11:50:43 DC3 samba: conn[named_pipe] c[unix:] s[unix:/opt/samba/var/run/ncalrpc/np/netlogon] server_id[2157][2157]:   schannel_check_required: [LOJA09A] is not using schannel Any ideia ? Regards; On 18-05-2018 12:24, Carlos wrote: > > More information: > > Macchine [LOJA09A] is my proxy Squid with ntlm, is dont working now... > > Winbind is ok(list user and group), but not autenticatio!! > > Sq...

Hi, We have successfully upgraded from samba 4.4.3 to samba 4.9.13 as AD controller with your very helpfully advice. When we finished the upgrade process, and with all servers fully working, including printer and shares servers, we did have to add the ?server schannel = no? parameter to smb.conf because of a EMC Unity NAS that was giving secure channel error on user validation. After that change everything was working great. Now we want to add to that samba 4.9.13 AD domain a Windows 2008R2 as additional domain controller. And is happening again the same ?secur...

...--flapping=/var/tmp/samba-4.2.1/selftest/flapping | tee ./st/subunit | /usr/bin/python -u /var/tmp/samba-4.2.1/selftest/format-subunit --prefix=./st --immediate ERROR: test failed with exit code 1 make: *** [quicktest] Error 1 the "summary" file reads: = Failed tests = == samba3.rpc.schannel(s3dc) == envlog: SMBD LOG of: LOCALS3DC2 _netr_LogonSamLogonEx: client smbd not using schannel for netlogon _netr_LogonSamLogonEx: client smbd not using schannel for netlogon _netr_LogonSamLogonEx: client smbd not using schannel for netlogon _netr_LogonSamLogonEx: client smbd not using schannel for...

...ou have come acrross with this issue. My ss7 link get fluctuating. It use chan_ss7 version 1.0.95-beta. I have 8 E1s running on a DL380 server with Digium E1 cards ( 4 port cards). This enable to have calls from sip to ss7 and vice versa. However ss7 links are not stable. linkset siuc, link l1, schannel 1, sls 0, NOT_ALIGNED, rx: 1, tx: 2/4, sentseq/lastack: 127/127, total 4034145216, 4031118560 linkset siuc, link l5, schannel 1, sls 1, INSERVICE, rx: 5, tx: 3/3, sentseq/lastack: 95/95, total 4030833616, 4028245568 ^[[A[root at localhost ~]# asterisk -rx "ss7 link status" linkset siuc, l...

Hi there, I've seen a strange thing not reported yet AFAIK. We have W2K DCs with SP3 with Samba 3.0.2a everything works fine in regard to winbind, but with Samba 3.0.3 winbind produces schannel len 24 errors and 'wbinfo -t' and 'id DOMAIN\userid' doesn't work. Note that wbinfo -u|g works well and a join was successful as well. I tried to tune my krb5.conf but in the end I disabled 'client schannel' in smb.conf. Does anyone know what is going wrong exactly? Is t...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. ZeroLogon ========= Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue. For details please see https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-1472.html. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== Python 3.6 or later required -------------------------...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. ZeroLogon ========= Please avoid to set "server schannel = no" and "server schannel= auto" on all Samba domain controllers due to the wellknown ZeroLogon issue. For details please see https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-1472.html. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== Python 3.6 or later required -------------------------...

I extracted the following weird error from the sys-log regarding pdu and schannel (have the same PID): Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: [2004/02/24 10:40:37, 0, pid=31833, effective(65534, 65533), real(65534, 0)] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: failed to decode PDU Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: [2004/02/24 10...

...i_pipe_validate_current_pd u) cli_pipe_validate_current_pdu: RPC fault code DCERPC_FAULT_OP_RNG_ERROR receiv ed from host ISHTAR! Anyone seen an error about 0 length names before? The OP_RNG error led me to try some ops with net rpc on ishtar. I tried a "net rpc samdump" and got: get_schannel_session_key: could not fetch trust account password for domain 'BLISS' cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel: failed to get schannel session key from server 127.0.0.1 for domain BLISS. Could not initialise schannel netlogon pipe. Error was NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO ---- I presume this isn...

..., and Samba implements the protocol, Samba is also vulnerable. However, since version 4.8 (released in March 2018), the default behaviour of Samba has been to insist on a secure netlogon channel, which is a sufficient fix against the known exploits. This default is equivalent to having 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. Therefore versions 4.8 and above are not vulnerable unless they have the smb.conf lines 'server schannel = no' or 'server schannel = auto'. Samba versions 4.7 and below are vulnerable unless they have 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. No...

..., and Samba implements the protocol, Samba is also vulnerable. However, since version 4.8 (released in March 2018), the default behaviour of Samba has been to insist on a secure netlogon channel, which is a sufficient fix against the known exploits. This default is equivalent to having 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. Therefore versions 4.8 and above are not vulnerable unless they have the smb.conf lines 'server schannel = no' or 'server schannel = auto'. Samba versions 4.7 and below are vulnerable unless they have 'server schannel = yes' in the smb.conf. No...

...ications (always): Enabled Microsoft network server: Digitally sign communications (if client agrees): Enabled Microsoft network server: Digitally sign communications (always): Enabled The following Settings in smb.conf does not work :-( server signing = mandatory client signing = mandatory server schannel = auto client schannel = auto Thanks in advance. Rgds Dieter