search for: sanborned

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Sanborn, Ed.vcf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 453 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20000531/c022b23d/SanbornEd.obj

NT 4.0 workstation users are complaining that all of their drive letters are getting used up by what appears to be a rampant network-drive mapping situation. For example, normally I have three shares network-mapped. Lately, ceetain people are complaining that one of their shares get's remapped a number of times to take up all the drive letters (except drive letter Z). So suddenly they

Hi R folks, I am using R version 2.2.1 for Unix. I am exploring the rpart function, in particular the rpart.control parameter. I have tried using different values for xval (0, 1, 10, 20) leaving other parameters constant but I receive the same tree after each run. Is the10 fold cross-validation default still running every time? I would expect the trees to change at least a little when I

I have a Samba 1.9.18p8 server running fine on a particular network: >From smb.conf: interfaces = 138.120.247.0/24 ..and all works well with PC's on that network accessing the Samba server. Now for the tricky part. I want to move all of my computers to a new Class C network: 192.168.164.0 I have the router setup with DNS working, etc. I migrated one machine over to that network.

Occasionaly folks with Samba network-mapped drives under WinNT 4.0 complain that "all of a sudden" they do not have write permissions to directories/files in the network-mapped drive. Very strange, as they were able to only hours before. I thought it may have something to do with when I make a change to my smb.conf and do a 'kill -HUP <pid of inetd>'. But that being the

I''ve run across something that would save me days of trouble. Situation, the contents of one ZFS file system needs to be moved to another ZFS file system. The destination can be the same Zpool, even a brand new ZFS file system. A command to move the data from one ZFS file system to another, WITHOUT COPYING, would be nice. At present, the data is almost 1TB. Ideally a "zmv" or

I am trying to get my linux box running slackware with kernel 2.0.36 and samba 2.0.0 (full version not BETA) to join our NT domain. I first added to computer to the domain. Then I typed this (computer and domain names altered for protection): linux_computer:/usr/local/samba/bin# smbpasswd -j MY_DOMAIN -r MY_PDC Where linux_computer is the linux computer (like you needed that) MY_DOMAIN is the

Unknown recipient ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 1:02 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2158 > SAMBA Digest 2158 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) msaccess and samba prob solved -

I am using "maps". I am running the following code to get this list of all the counties: map('county', plot=FALSE)$names In the output, all counties have first the state listed and then, after a comma, the name of the county. However, county # 2395 (State = south dakota) has no county name. Anyone knows what this county is? Thank you! -- Dimitri Liakhovitski

Hi, I'm debating purchasing a NetAppliance fileserver that does native CIFS. Below is a URL to a NetAppliance authored paper regarding performance. One of the sections compares NFS to CIFS and talks about Samba. Can anyone dispute any of this? Is there any reason besides price that I should stick with Samba? -Ed Ed Sanborn (978) 691-6496 Northchurch

I have 2.0.6 running on a FreeBSD 3.4-current box with a 3com-905b NIC, linking to a 5-port 10/100 hub at 100Mb, half-duplex. I'm connecting to the share with an OSR2 box with another 905b at 100Mb, half-duplex. Here's the problem: I can write to the share at about 3.5 MB/s, but can only read at about 250k/sec. I tried FTPing a file from the BSD box and got about 3-4 MB/s. I'm