search for: sams

Hi there, I have another problem on WinXP SP2 with samba.3.0.20a. Somehow, in a random situation, once user logged onto the workstations, they were prompted with the winlogon.exe Fatal error + blue screen to death then self-reboot. When I checked out the log from windows, it said there's problem on msgina.dll from WinXP SP2. However, another user can successfully logon to the same workstation

I'm trying to build llvm and clang release_34 git branch on ubuntu 13.04, using cmake, and i'm getting numerous errors from lldb: [ 83%] Building CXX object tools/lldb/source/Core/CMakeFiles/lldbCore.dir/Address.cpp.o /home/sam/src/llvm/tools/lldb/source/Expression/ClangExpressionParser.cpp: In function ‘clang::FrontendAction* CreateFrontendBaseAction(clang::CompilerInstance&)’:

Dear all, I am running R 2.4.1. > library(siggenes); > library(multtest); > cl<-rep(c(0,1),c(3,3)); > sub<-exprs(AffyExpData[,c(1:3,7:9)]); > gn<-geneNames(AffyRAwData); > sam.out<-sam(sub,cl,rand=123,gene.names=gn); We're doing 20 complete permutations > sam.out SAM Analysis for the Two-Class Unpaired Case Assuming Unequal Variances Delta p0

Ok it seems like you are in the exact same situation I was. So here are the files in a tgz. Once uncompressed, you'll have to change each occurance of "DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" according to your configuration. you can do this with something like : perl -pi -e 's/DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com/DC=Carlos,DC=com/g' * Then you will have to run ldbadd and ldbmodify in the correct order to upgrade

msDS-isRODC is introduced in version 32 of the schema. This is the problem I faced. You can have a look to https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-August/193258.html. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mail

CentOS 3.5 samba3-3.0.20a-24 Security ADS I can't get windows group permissions on shares to work except for 'domain users'. The windows group I am trying to use is Unix.Samba. This group does not exist on the linux box. It resolves correctly using getent group and when I chgrp files to unix.samba, ls shows the group ownership as Unix.Samba. getent group shows this group with the

You should run : ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base possSuperiors If the result is : # record 1 dn: CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=DEVINLECLECLERC,DC=com possSuperiors: container possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nisMap Then it's OK, the script tried to add a

Hi, We have suddenly noticed a difference between our dc's. The file called /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/sam.ldb is only present on 1 of our three dc's. The AD seems to be in healthy state, but...isn't this a bit strange? root at dc3:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d# ls -l sam.ldb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53248 Sep 2 17:31 sam.ldb root at dc3:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d#

Hi everyone, I am wondering what is the difference between the content in sam.ldb and sam.ldb.d/DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=LAN. In the two file I have my user entry: # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC\=TRANQUILIT\,DC\=LOCAL.ldb | grep dn | grep CN=dcardon dn: CN=dcardon,CN=Users,DC=tranquilit,DC=local # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb | grep dn | grep CN=dcardon dn:

2018-06-29 15:12 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:56:33 +0800 > d tbsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi: >> >> at RHEL 7.4 we had used "map untrusted to domain = yes". so users >> can login with "username" instead of "sam-dom\username". >>

Okay, I'm already riding the test base ... thank you Leveraging believe may be related, when access peo UDCA part of Domains Controller, I can think of error and logs appears: [12/30/2015 08: 55: 52.277383, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb wrap.c: 72 (ldb wrap debug) ldb: acl_read: CN = DC-LINUX, OU = Domain Controllers, DC = Internal, DC = MYDOMAIN can not find attr [msDS-isRODC] in schema of It

Hi all When creating unit tests, I wondered whether I should rather use the following... people(:sam).name = "Sammy" people(:sam).city = "Blah" ...or rather the following form: @sam = people(:sam) @sam.name = "Sammy" @sam.city = "Blah" Thanks Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have a few Samba 4.2 DC in production now and figured that I should do something about backups. I have read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Backup_and_restore_an_Samba_AD_DC and had a look through the samba_backup script and have a few questions. Firstly I am using the Sernet packages on Centos7. I am assuming the following mappings from the script for my set up /usr/local/samba/etc is

OK, ii see this then thank you . Executed the process ldbadd / ldbmodify and me only generated an error ldbmodify -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '--option = DSDB: update schema allowed = true' sch40mod.ldf ERR: (Attribute or value exists) "attribute 'possSuperiors': value # 0 on 'CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = Internal, DC =

Hello! Command output mainly seemed OK. ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = MYDOMAIN" -s base possSuperiors # 1 record dn: CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = Internal, DC = MYDOMAIN possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nismap possSuperiors: container # Returned 1 records

Hello Carlos, I had the same problem as you. To solve the problem, I just modified the files I needed from adprep in order to be able to run ldbadd and ldbmodify. Can you run something like this to check your schema version ? ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=YOURDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base objectVersion

How many of you are using Rails: 1. As the primary development tool at your Day Job 2. As a small part of your Day Job 3. Not using Rails in your Day Job, but are using Ruby 4. For OS/outside work/hobby -- sam http://www.magpiebrain.com/

Sorry for the serial posting, but ... anxious ... I think there must be a bug in Samba 4.4.8, this all worked with 4.2.14. To summarize (details in attached messages), since upgrading from Samba 4.2.14 to 4.4.8, getent returns the wrong UID:GID. This is causing permission errors in programs like dovecot who try to read/write to Maildir files having the correct UID:GID. With 4.4.8 I now have

Hello, I use Samba 3.5.11 from debian. I'm trying to add new Win7Pro to domain, but I still get error: "The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted". using wireshark I can see SMB_NETLOGON 279 SAM LOGON request from client SMB_NETLOGON 270 SAM Response - user unknown SMB_NETLOGON 279 SAM LOGON request from client SMB_NETLOGON 270 SAM Response - user unknown

I have been running Samba4 as AD/DC for a mixed Windows/Linux office domain for a little over 2 1/2 years now. I've needed a few tweaks from Roland, but basically it has run flawless during that time. 10 days ago, I upgrade to Slackware 14.2 from 14.1. Samba was likewise upgraded from version 4.2.14 to 4.4.8. I'm having a serious problem ... before the upgrade getent gave me: $