search for: sahring

I have installed a samba share for an Epson FX-85 printer. The smb.conf file is shwon below: # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2004/04/19 17:05:12 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = PENGUINIX interfaces = eth0, lo bind interfaces only = Yes password server = clyde guest account = guest log level = 1 log

Greetings, I made some search on Google regarding this matter and found many diverse information, some dated back to 2004, and would like to update and clarify this issue. The question is: "what's the problem on re-sharing a NFS filesystem with Samba?". The only way I found to share a NFS mount point on Samba without apparent problem is to disable file locking on NFS mount by

hello, today the following problem occurred: [2019/10/08 09: 57: 23.568282, 1] ../../source3/librpc/crypto/gse.c:660(gse_get_server_auth_token) gss_accept_sec_context failed with [Miscellaneous failure (see text): Failed to find cifs/fs-share at dom.corp (kvno 109) in keytab MEMORY: cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] in my smb.conf I have the lines: kerberos method = dedicated keytab

I have the problem of needing to hide some directories from the browse list (Win98 clients) of some users (total of about 250). I am expecting to create behaviour similar to the home directory where only the home owner can see it. I would like to make some shares visible only to users in a certain Unix group. I have a share 'Automation' with a sub-directory structure and I use Unix

We're using a couple of HP printers (2200, 4200, 3390) using the HP PCL 6 printer driver. Printer drivers are installed on the samba (3.0.24) box, connecting, driver installation and printing work OK. Problem: using the same driver version with the printer shared by a windows box gives some additional options like - brochure printing - putting serveral pages on one sheet Any Idea why

I have installed a small Limux box in my local primary school, in order to sahre CD iso images. The system works fine, untill several w/s's concurrently access the same program , whereupon, we get spurious crashes. I have tried disableing op-locks, which seemed to help, but only slightly. Any suggestions gratefully received. Shane oplock_break: no break received from client within 30

Dear friends, One of my friends got a ttypical problem with installing linux on a m/c with PIII 933 MHz. , 256 MB SDRAM , 20 GB HDD with SIS 6326 motherboard [ intel 815EEA chipset ] + 8 MB sahred memory. He made a dos FAT 32 partition with 12 GB keeping win98 and another 8GB as non dos for Linux Red Hat 7.1 ] While installing and specifying / , /boot , /usr , /usr/src ,

On 19/04/16 21:08, Thomas Smith wrote: > It was my understanding that winbind wasn't necessary for Samba4. This > server has been running for months without it. > > Sanatized smb.conf: > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = DCS > realm = DCS.LOCAL > netbios name = SERVER > server role = active directory domain

There is no winbindd--it was never installed. I don't recall exactly why I didn't install it, but I seem to recall something about Samba4 in an AD domain control role not needing it. I ended up using SSS instead. Sanatized smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DCS realm = DCS.LOCAL netbios name = SERVER server role = active directory domain

It was my understanding that winbind wasn't necessary for Samba4. This server has been running for months without it. Sanatized smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DCS realm = DCS.LOCAL netbios name = SERVER server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes debug level =

Ok, thank you--that worked, but it doesn't make sense. The server's been operational for months without winbind. Did something change in Samba that it won't operate now without it? I specifically remember reading that winbind wasn't necessary and, in fact, wasn't recommended with Samba 4 AD. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:27 PM Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:

Hello, we have two bugs filed for Linux-x86 and Linux-x86-64 both using OCFS2 for their 9.2.0.7 DB installation. Strange thing happening in these two ports is, after DB got created, we are seeing 'Corrupt data block' messages in alert logs and when the same blocks verified connecting to database appears to be clean. This inconsistency is stopping customer to go further use DB. This

We used successfully samba 3.5.15-74.fc15 in our production (animation studio). It was installed on FC15 on ext4 volume. Now, we got new hardware and tried fresh software installation: it is CentOS7, with Samba 4.1.12 and XFS volumes. So, now we got strange problem. Some production software (Autodesk Maya2016) got errors trying to work with files. There is no such problem with Samba3. For

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > > > Am 01.06.2016 um 15:58 schrieb Rob Lee: > > We have 4ge programs running on AIX. The output files from these programs need to be read from Windows > desktops and servers. > > well, setup a proper OS with a recent samba in a virtual machine and > just use that directly from the AIX machine or mount

Hi, we have several samba servers running as AD members (w2003 domain). Since the Upgrade to samba 3.0.8 the following message appears, when accessing a share on the memberserver from clienthost rmts2. [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250) Username NTROBOTIC\rmts2$ is invalid on this system [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250)

Hello, As subject says I am working on browsing and access servers, which are dispatched on two subnet, in one workgroup named "WORKGROUP". First here the network : ( I don' t use ASCI art 'cause I am not an expert on that and it may not be printed as it was emailed. ) So, there is five machine : - one, under debian 6, which is the gateway - two, under

Dear All, I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in production as? samba file server so far its working grt but I have one issue i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share to see it and the others should not when I log into the user who has no access I see the share and when i double click it ask me for username and

Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/starting Samba: [2016/04/19 12:27:06.043469, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main) samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015 [2016/04/19 12:27:06.157629, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:490(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard' process model samba: setproctitle not

and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd