search for: sahr

I have installed a samba share for an Epson FX-85 printer. The smb.conf file is shwon below: # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2004/04/19 17:05:12 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = PENGUINIX interfaces = eth0, lo bind interfaces only = Yes password server = clyde guest account = guest log level = 1 log

Greetings, I made some search on Google regarding this matter and found many diverse information, some dated back to 2004, and would like to update and clarify this issue. The question is: "what's the problem on re-sharing a NFS filesystem with Samba?". The only way I found to share a NFS mount point on Samba without apparent problem is to disable file locking on NFS mount by

...t): Failed to find cifs/fs-share at dom.corp (kvno 109) in keytab MEMORY: cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] in my smb.conf I have the lines: kerberos method = dedicated keytab dedicated keytab file = /etc/samba/fs.keytab # net ads keytab list Vno Type Principal 108 arcfour-hmac-md5 cifs/fs-sahre at dom.corp 108 des-cbc-md5 cifs/fs-sahre at dom.corp 108 des-cbc-crc cifs/fs-sahre at dom.corp it worked for several days, to make it work I used ktutils and adding the spn again to have 109. my /etc/krb5.conf: [Libdefaults] default_realm = DOM.CORP default_etypes = aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96...

...p. I have a share 'Automation' with a sub-directory structure and I use Unix user and group rights to manage that. I would like 'Automation' to be invisible to about 1/2 of the users (today they see it even though they have no access). I am using 'hide unreadable' in the sahre and it works great 'inside' the share but what I would like is to hide the share itself. I've searched around and found an idea of including conf files per user or group (where I would define which shares appear) but this seems very complex to manage on a daily basis with a large...

...ng, driver installation and printing work OK. Problem: using the same driver version with the printer shared by a windows box gives some additional options like - brochure printing - putting serveral pages on one sheet Any Idea why those options are gone from printer settings if the printer is sahred by a samba box and/or how to get them back? Thanks, Martin

I have installed a small Limux box in my local primary school, in order to sahre CD iso images. The system works fine, untill several w/s's concurrently access the same program , whereupon, we get spurious crashes. I have tried disableing op-locks, which seemed to help, but only slightly. Any suggestions gratefully received. Shane oplock_break: no break received fro...

Dear friends, One of my friends got a ttypical problem with installing linux on a m/c with PIII 933 MHz. , 256 MB SDRAM , 20 GB HDD with SIS 6326 motherboard [ intel 815EEA chipset ] + 8 MB sahred memory. He made a dos FAT 32 partition with 12 GB keeping win98 and another 8GB as non dos for Linux Red Hat 7.1 ] While installing and specifying / , /boot , /usr , /usr/src , /usr/local and swap we got a typical error saying the partion is above 1023 sectors or clustors. After this at last it...

...t; > debug level = 0 > > [netlogon] > path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/dcs.local/scripts > read only = No > > [sysvol] > path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol > read only = No > > # Network shares. > [Share] > comment = Sahre. > path = /srv/samba/Share > read only = no > browsable = no > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:05 PM Thomas Smith <theitsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is no winbindd--it was never installed. I don't recall exactly why I >> didn&...

...r dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes debug level = 0 [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/dcs.local/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No # Network shares. [Share] comment = Sahre. path = /srv/samba/Share read only = no browsable = no On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:57 PM lingpanda101 at gmail.com < lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2016 3:39 PM, Thomas Smith wrote: > > Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/start...

...r dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes debug level = 0 [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/dcs.local/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No # Network shares. [Share] comment = Sahre. path = /srv/samba/Share read only = no browsable = no On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:05 PM Thomas Smith <theitsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > There is no winbindd--it was never installed. I don't recall exactly why I > didn't install it, but I seem to recall...

...on] > > path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/dcs.local/scripts > > read only = No > > > > [sysvol] > > path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol > > read only = No > > > > # Network shares. > > [Share] > > comment = Sahre. > > path = /srv/samba/Share > > read only = no > > browsable = no > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:05 PM Thomas Smith <theitsmith at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> There is no winbindd--it was never installed. I don...

Hello, we have two bugs filed for Linux-x86 and Linux-x86-64 both using OCFS2 for their 9.2.0.7 DB installation. Strange thing happening in these two ports is, after DB got created, we are seeing 'Corrupt data block' messages in alert logs and when the same blocks verified connecting to database appears to be clean. This inconsistency is stopping customer to go further use DB. This

We used successfully samba 3.5.15-74.fc15 in our production (animation studio). It was installed on FC15 on ext4 volume. Now, we got new hardware and tried fresh software installation: it is CentOS7, with Samba 4.1.12 and XFS volumes. So, now we got strange problem. Some production software (Autodesk Maya2016) got errors trying to work with files. There is no such problem with Samba3. For

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > > > Am 01.06.2016 um 15:58 schrieb Rob Lee: > > We have 4ge programs running on AIX. The output files from these programs need to be read from Windows > desktops and servers. > > well, setup a proper OS with a recent samba in a virtual machine and > just use that directly from the AIX machine or mount

Hi, we have several samba servers running as AD members (w2003 domain). Since the Upgrade to samba 3.0.8 the following message appears, when accessing a share on the memberserver from clienthost rmts2. [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250) Username NTROBOTIC\rmts2$ is invalid on this system [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250)

...t up send using brodcast their server announcement (share, messenger, user logged) on the local subnet and the LMB interpret them. After they give their IP address to the WINS server. With no wins server (nor xp client, nor samba configuration) used each subnet can see (browse) and can access (sahre) all other computer on the same subnet. Now, the idea is to make computer on each subnet must see computer on the other one with the help of WINS and master roles. I don't make this works. I don' t know where to place "remote announce", "remote browse sync" and whic...

Dear All, I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in production as? samba file server so far its working grt but I have one issue i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share to see it and the others should not when I log into the user who has no access I see the share and when i double click it ask me for username and

Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/starting Samba: [2016/04/19 12:27:06.043469, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main) samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015 [2016/04/19 12:27:06.157629, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:490(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard' process model samba: setproctitle not

...swords = yes > > [Documents] > path = /Docs > writable = yes > valid users = elovkoff > > The weird thing about it is when I issue password for IPC$ that is > equivalent for password created with smbpasswd for that user I can see > the folders inside of the sahre BUT: > 1. I cannot create folders in spite that I have 'writable=yes' > 2. Next time I login to this workstation and try to connect to the share > on linux I'm not being asked my username and passwoed and this is > exactly the opposit of what I'm trying to achive - to b...

...t71 security = user encrypt passwords = yes [Documents] path = /Docs writable = yes valid users = elovkoff The weird thing about it is when I issue password for IPC$ that is equivalent for password created with smbpasswd for that user I can see the folders inside of the sahre BUT: 1. I cannot create folders in spite that I have 'writable=yes' 2. Next time I login to this workstation and try to connect to the share on linux I'm not being asked my username and passwoed and this is exactly the opposit of what I'm trying to achive - to be asked for passw...