search for: sacrif

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

...#if a is numeric, assign all x that are greater than a; otherwise assign the entire x b2=x[x>a] ## assign all x greater than a b1 and b2 should be equal as I see it. Anybody who can explain why they are not makes my day, especially the one who can tell me how I can get b1 equal to b2 (without sacrificing the ifelse condition). Thanks much, Daniel ------------------------- cuncta stricte discussurus

...n I tried... but that's another story). And if I do create another format first and eventually end up with a wmf, what is the best way to get there without loosing quality on the way through the conversion(s)? So my question is this: How can I end up with a wmf files using linux, without sacrificing too much (any?) quality on the way? I looked in the Mail archives and couldn't find anything useful. Thanks as always, P. -- Dr Peter Dunn (USQ CRICOS No. 00244B) Web: http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/dunn Email: dunn @ usq.edu.au Opinions expressed are mine, not those...

...> time but it might be something to think about if this is being expanded. > At the command-line level, I don't see a lot of value in separating the two flags. At the Function/Loop/Block/Instruction level, separating the two would be more useful though. E.g. normalizing input/output; or sacrificing accuracy to speed up a hot loop. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190917/d727b2c1/attachment.html>

Greetings Does anyone have any suggestions for reducing pdf file size, particularly pdfs containing photos, without sacrificing quality? Thanks for any tips in advance. Cheers Kurt *************************************************************** Kurt Lewis Helf, Ph.D. Ecologist EEO Counselor National Park Service Cumberland Piedmont Network P.O. Box 8 Mammoth Cave, KY 42259 Ph: 270-758-2163 Lab: 270-758-2151 Fax: 270-...

Op 03-12-14 om 16:48 schreef Olivier Tristan: > Looks like I've missed the talk about this regression introduced in 1.3.1.

...me. >> >> Any objections or suggestions? Is this something that people can agree on, >> i.e. do patches going in this direction have a good chance of being >> accepted? > > Sounds good to me, I'm happy to accept any patch that reduces LLVM binary size > without sacrificing performance. Passing MCInstrInfo isn't a big deal. Thanks. Though note that it wouldn't affect the total binary size - instead, it would move data from .data.rel.ro to .rodata, which means the total binary size remains roughly the same, but more data can be directly mmapped from di...

...re always quiet in order to guard against clipping. These live recordings are then archived via FLAC to make sure nothing is lost. So do I, and I included a few unaltered samples with plenty of headroom in my standard test corpus for these improvements. > but recent 'improvements' are sacrificing performance in one area to enhance performance in another area. That is certainly not the case. The compression level retuning doesn't work beneficial for all material, but it is in this case simply coincidence that it is some quiet material that seems to suffer. The patch attached to...

Hello R-USERS, I think some people didn't understand my question. What I want is to use the training set to minimize the FALSE POSITIVE RATE. I think it is possible. I sacrifice ACCURACY to have less FALSE POSITIVES. I don't want a classifier result with 5% of FPR and, for example, 93% of ACCURACY. I want a 1% FPR sacrificing the 93% ACCURACY. Do you know how can I do this? I really need this because the requisite of the work I'm doing is only 1% of FPR. Tha...

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Brian Hurt wrote: > Another possibility, and I'm not sure how to do this in LLVM, would be to > sacrifice a register to hold the pointer to the unique per-thread > structure. This would be worthwhile to me even on the register-starved > x86-32. I suppose I could also just add a "hidden" (compiler-added and > -maintained) argument to every function which is the pointer to the &gt...

...stt/AAAB> Aug 12 12:17:13 imap(user at domain.tld): Info: Logged out in=305 out=2277 I've also tried logging to a specific file, instead of /dev/null, but no file was created. So there must be an issue with my understanding. How can I prevent logins from localhost from being logged without sacrificing logs for all logins? -Jason Young

...rbis audio codec from xiph.org. Full details of this code release can be found at <http://www.wss.co.uk/pinknoise/theorarm>, but highlights include: * Full speed playback of a 320x240x25fps clip with a 48kHz stereo audio track on an 416Mhz Xscale based wince device. (39fps if audio sync is sacrificed). * With post processing (deblocking/deringing) enabled, this drops to 23fps. * Uses no hardware acceleration features (e.g. dithered YUV2RGB is done in software, so on devices with such features available, it could go even faster). * Uses ARMv4 instructions only (no reliance on Xscale SI...

...de. IMO, any convention that contains leading or trailing underscores should be rejected outright. The primary purpose of a convention is to allow a person to differentiate between different kinds of elements with a quick glance. It should strive to make these elements appear different without sacrificing the readability. Prepending or appending a lone underscore is really making the identifier as similar to another one as possible, while still making it different from the language standard point of view, i.e. the opposite to what a useful convention should do. -Krzysztof

With 1.2.11 and mbox storage, the delay time in pulling new mail headers to the client from imap folders seems to be directly proportional to mailbox size, regardless of the number of new messages. At present, if the mailbox is large, pulling new headers is rather painfully slow. Is this expected behavior? Especially given that the client already has all the "old" mails in the folder

...in a compilation unit, in the > case > where compiling the whole unit at -O0 would make the program run too > slowly." > > In general, it is something that should help improve the debugging > experience when customers have to debug specific portions of their code > without sacrificing any of their overall runtime performances. > As a side note, using GCC is not a option for us. > To be clear, I am not advocating GCC at all here. Just pointing out there is room for improvement for DOC so that user does not need to resort to these workarounds. I know Eric Christopher...

..., the performance gain is worth it. The primary goal is to be not worse > than ticket spinlock in light load situation which is the most common case. > This feature is need to achieve that. Ok. I've seen merit in pvqspinlock even with slightly slower first-waiter, so I would have happily sacrificed those horrible branches. (I prefer elegant to optimized code, but I can see why we want to be strictly better than ticketlock.) Peter mentioned that we are focusing on bare-metal patches, so I'll withold my other paravirt rants until they are polished. And to forcefully bring this thread...

..., the performance gain is worth it. The primary goal is to be not worse > than ticket spinlock in light load situation which is the most common case. > This feature is need to achieve that. Ok. I've seen merit in pvqspinlock even with slightly slower first-waiter, so I would have happily sacrificed those horrible branches. (I prefer elegant to optimized code, but I can see why we want to be strictly better than ticketlock.) Peter mentioned that we are focusing on bare-metal patches, so I'll withold my other paravirt rants until they are polished. And to forcefully bring this thread...

...d maildir because it has a relatively high space cost; mbox has no inter-message cost while maildir wastes on average half a sector plus an inode for each message. What other formats are there, and has anyone come up with a good format that gives both good time and space characteristics without sacrificing reliability? (I'm aware of the file format list in the UW-IMAP distro: <http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/formats.txt.html>)

...ault GDM display manager with SLiM disables many functions (like audio). Restoring these functions means messing around with groups and permissions. Like GDM, LightDM enables these functions. However, LightDM is substantially lighter than GDM. Given that Swift Linux needs to fit on a CD without sacrificing LibreOffice, every MB counts. What I miss from SLiM is the better-looking login box. The default login box of LightDM is ugly. How do I change the appearance of the login box? I'd like to make it translucent, shrink the session box, and eliminate the icon and the computer name from the...

Looking at http://www.fontconfig.org/wiki/TitleIndex I see it's around 99.9% pure spam. Other than the front page, virtually everything else is the moin-moin boilerplate or the hundreds of pages of spam. Even the Recent Changes & Find Page links have been overwritten by spammers hundreds of times, with the spammers fighting each other to crap on it most recently. (I restored them both