search for: s25

...$noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool) 96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr 112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr 128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr 144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp 160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 176B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 192B $r0 = COPY %...

If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is: * ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize * In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6) * The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the

...uy_bw is the dataframe with 7305 obs. and 10 variables Once I apply this code I only receive a data frame with 58440 obs. of 2 variables, of which there should be 73,050 obs. of 2 variables, just wondering what is happening here? View(nfcuy_bw) attach(nfcuy_bw) cuyahoga_nf<-data.frame(s5,s10,s25,s27,s33,s41,s51,his_c) cuy_nf<-stack(cuyahoga_nf) Thanks Meredith -- Doctoral Candidate Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...$noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool) 96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr 112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr 128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr 144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp 160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 176B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 192B $r0 = COPY %...

Hi, I am trying to read the "credit.lisp" file of the Japanese credit database in UCI repository, but it is in lisp format which I do not know how to read. I have not found how to do that in the foreign library http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Japanese+Credit+Screening <http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Japanese+Credit+Screening> Could anyone help me? Best

Martin, Thanks for the helpful reply. Alas I had forgotten that (implied) unfavorable comparisons of *nix systems with Windows systems would likely draw irate (but always substantive) responses on the R-devel list -- poor phrasing on my part. :) Regardless, let me try to address some of the concerns related to the construction of the MRE itself and try to see if we can clean away the shrubbery

...6 4 S20 21 s 6 5 5 7 6 6 5 5 S21 22 s 8 8 3 7 6 7 5 3 S22 23 s 11 4 6 7 1 1 6 4 S23 24 s 6 3 2 4 6 4 2 2 S24 25 s 4 4 6 6 2 3 4 6 S25 26 w 5 9 4 7 3 7 3 5 S26 27 w 7 6 3 5 4 1 0 4 S27 28 w 10 4 14 2 8 4 10 2 S28 29 w 9 7 5 6 8 4 5 3 S29 30 w 9 2 7 5 6 2 6 5 S30 31 w...

...s 16GB c1t0d0s3 d13 s 16GB c1t1d0s3 /var d5 m 8.0GB d15 d15 s 16GB c1t0d0s1 d25 s 16GB c1t1d0s1 I removed c1t1d0 from the mirror: # metadetach d4 d24 # metaclear d24 # metadetach d3 d23 # metaclear d23 # metadetach d5 d25 # metaclear s25 then removed the metadb from c1d1d0s7 # metadb -d c1t1d0s7 Resized s0 on c1t1d0 to include the whole disc and relabelled with an SMI label. Created the zfs root pool: # zpool create rpool c1t1d0s0 Created new BE: # lucreate -c Sol11_b96 -n Sol11_b96_zfs -p rpool This ran fine, so I activated...

...06/2007 Somerset 0 S15 FALSE 1 A 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 11 33.36 62 30/06/2007 Somerset 0 S17 FALSE 1 A 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 27.10 63 30/06/2007 Somerset 0 S2 FALSE 1 A 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 27.87 64 03/07/2007 Somerset 0 S25 FALSE 1 A 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 27.34 65 03/07/2007 Somerset 0 S28 FALSE 1 A 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 23.83 66 03/07/2007 Somerset 0 S29 FALSE 1 A 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 21.51 67 03/07/2007 Somerset 0 S31 FALSE 1 A 1 0...

On 04/11/2017 10:20 PM, Daniel Nordlund wrote: > Tirthankar, > > "random number generators" do not produce random numbers. Any given > generator produces a fixed sequence of numbers that appear to meet > various tests of randomness. By picking a seed you enter that sequence > in a particular place and subsequent numbers in the sequence appear to > be unrelated.

...isnet.nl (tr08.kennisnet.nl [212.178.7.199]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD7540C4 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 07:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntpeter ([213.34.198.239]) by e4212.srv.kennisnet.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GJ71O803.S25; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:31:20 +0200 Message-ID: <002401c13617$7d2b4520$efc622d5@kennisnet.nl> From: "List Client" <listclient@atlascollege.nl> To: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter@valinux.com>, <p.kaagman@atlascollege.nl>, <samba@lists.samba.org> Reference...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking