search for: s10u9

...scure reasons, we''re going to destroy / re-create those pools. We originally skipped mpxio due to the cfgadm issues, even though we''d have preferred to have the reliablity enhancements. Those issues seem to have re-appeared in various guises (e.g. bug 6948701, nominally fixed in s10u9). Due to the need to inter-operate (zfs send) with other s10u7 machines, I don''t think moving to update 9 is an option (yet), nor is OSOL or SXCE. Bottom line: Do ZFS / mpxio / cfgadm issues still make mpxio an iffy proposition as a reliability enhancement? Is there a patch set that ad...

While thinking about ZFS as the next generation filesystem without limits I am wondering if the real world is ready for this kind of incredible technology ... I''m actually speaking of hardware :) ZFS can handle a lot of devices. Once in the import bug (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6761786) is fixed it should be able to handle a lot of disks. I want to

Hello list, someone (actually neil perrin (CC)) mentioned in this thread: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-December/034340.html that is should be possible to import a pool with failed log devices (with or without data loss ?). >/ />/ Has the following error no consequences? />/ />/ Bug ID 6538021 />/ Synopsis Need a way to force pool startup when