Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "s100x".
Did you mean:
100x
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] questions about 1.1.0 release
...e
details in the history file puzzle me, so I've not tried to use it yet.
Pardon my denseness here ...
First, as long as you don't use the --cuesheet option when you encode, are
.flac files encoded by 1.1.0 still readable by earlier versions?
Second, if the old default for seekpoints was -S100x and the new one is -S10s,
does that mean that, if you encode a 44.1-ksps WAV that was ripped from a CD,
the old default was to set 441 seekpoints per second and the new one is to set
one seekpoint every ten seconds?
One of the major reasons I preferred FLAC to APE, despite APE's usually
tighte...
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] questions about 1.1.0 release
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:
> First, as long as you don't use the --cuesheet option when you
> encode, are
> .flac files encoded by 1.1.0 still readable by earlier versions?
that's right.
> Second, if the old default for seekpoints was -S100x and the new one
> is -S10s,
> does that mean that, if you encode a 44.1-ksps WAV that was ripped
> from a CD,
> the old default was to set 441 seekpoints per second and the new one
> is to set
> one seekpoint every ten seconds?
no, -S100x meant 100 seekpoints per stream, regardle...