search for: 100x

Hi, I type a value, for example, "10,00". I see in the screen "10,00" but when print that value is multiplied by 100x resulting: "1000,00". What can I do? wine 0.9.55-1 Debian/Sid Thanks. -- S?vio M Ramos Arquiteto, Rio, RJ S? uso Linux desde 2000 www.debian.org

...ithub.com/google/neper) as test process. Napi increases single stream throughput, but increases cycle cost. The optimizations bring this down. The previous patchset saw a regression with UDP_STREAM, which does not benefit from cleaning tx interrupts in rx napi. This regression is now gone for 10x, 100x. Remaining difference is higher 1x TCP_STREAM, lower 1x UDP_STREAM. The latest results are with process, rx napi and tx napi affine to the same core. All numbers are lower than the previous patchset. upstream napi TCP_STREAM: 1x: Mbps 27816 39805 Gcycles...

...ithub.com/google/neper) as test process. Napi increases single stream throughput, but increases cycle cost. The optimizations bring this down. The previous patchset saw a regression with UDP_STREAM, which does not benefit from cleaning tx interrupts in rx napi. This regression is now gone for 10x, 100x. Remaining difference is higher 1x TCP_STREAM, lower 1x UDP_STREAM. The latest results are with process, rx napi and tx napi affine to the same core. All numbers are lower than the previous patchset. upstream napi TCP_STREAM: 1x: Mbps 27816 39805 Gcycles...

If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ In a nutshell: some Perl apps are 100x slower on RedHat / CentOS 5 compared to other distributions. Bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379791 -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

Is there a way to disable all SIP registration and block any requests? The reason I'm asking is this particular Asterisk server will just be originating calls. I've noticed sip attacks where the attacker attempts to register a user 100x per second causing CPU to rise significantly. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110527/d93e809e/attachment.htm>

I''m installing Xen with the OpenSUSE 10.2 distro and the bigsmp-2.6.18.8-0.13.i586 kernel. However, I occasionally get insane amounts of slowdown (almost 100x) in dom0. On bootup, performance is normal. After an undeterministic period of time, I get this crazy amount of slowdown. I''m not sure why this is the case and I have spent a long time trying to figure it out. There are no background processes running and nothing CPU intensive show...

...ings (use warnings() to see the first 50) I am not understanding what is in SET_STRING_ELT which it is trying to throw an error. Please help me *Regards,* *Anshul Saravgi* Consulting m: 7757030307 <https://www.o9solutions.com/> AI powered solutions that predict, prescribe, learn and are 100x faster, smarter and easier to use -- This Electronic Mail (e-mail) contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the use of?the individual or entity to which it is sent. ?If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or?the employee or agent responsible for...

...blem with that combination.. samba work perfectly..but if someone want to write into homedir, they couldn't, and w2k workstation appear message , that disk is full.. disk isn't full, and permission are set correct I don't know, where should be a mistake, I check configuration problably 100x, but I haven't found any problem in it.. have you ever had someone similiar problem? thx a lot andrej -- >> jabber: ado@njs.netlab.cz << >> e-mail: ado@nirvanaclub.sk << ---------------------------------------- // just visit> http://www.nirvanaclub.s...

...Rs for I/O space. Or workarounds > for processor bugs. The only real user (other than this patch) is the > Intel microcode update driver. Memory serialization is sufficient in > all other cases on x86. One could imagine someone wanting to use it in a timing loop or something, and a 100x or 1000x slowdown might ruin their day. But it's not really all that important. I don't really see a good reason to not have a separate sync_core operation, but we can always add it later if needed. The bigger immediate issue is that we seem to be having an emerging tools compatibil...

...Mbps, 303 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 42267 Mbps, 431 Gcyc >> >> These numbers were obtained with the virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed >> optimization after xmit_skb, btw. It turns out that moving that before >> increases 1x TCP_RR further to ~39 Gbps, at the cost of reducing >> 100x TCP_RR a bit. > > > I see, so I think we can leave the affinity hint optimization/check for > future investigation: > > - to avoid endless optimization (e.g we may want to share a single > vector/napi for tx/rx queue pairs in the future) for this series. > - tx napi is disab...

...Mbps, 303 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 42267 Mbps, 431 Gcyc >> >> These numbers were obtained with the virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed >> optimization after xmit_skb, btw. It turns out that moving that before >> increases 1x TCP_RR further to ~39 Gbps, at the cost of reducing >> 100x TCP_RR a bit. > > > I see, so I think we can leave the affinity hint optimization/check for > future investigation: > > - to avoid endless optimization (e.g we may want to share a single > vector/napi for tx/rx queue pairs in the future) for this series. > - tx napi is disab...

...c 1,0,2: 40663 Mbps, 445 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 42420 Mbps, 303 Gcyc 1,0,2: 42267 Mbps, 431 Gcyc These numbers were obtained with the virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed optimization after xmit_skb, btw. It turns out that moving that before increases 1x TCP_RR further to ~39 Gbps, at the cost of reducing 100x TCP_RR a bit.

...c 1,0,2: 40663 Mbps, 445 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 42420 Mbps, 303 Gcyc 1,0,2: 42267 Mbps, 431 Gcyc These numbers were obtained with the virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed optimization after xmit_skb, btw. It turns out that moving that before increases 1x TCP_RR further to ~39 Gbps, at the cost of reducing 100x TCP_RR a bit.

...he optimization patch. That showed no significant difference with upstream. upstream napi +at-rx TCP_STREAM: 1x: Mbps 30537 37666 37910 Gcycles 400 540 405 10x: Mbps 41012 39954 40245 Gcycles 434 546 421 100x: Mbps 34088 34172 34245 Gcycles 435 546 418 TCP_RR Latency (us): 1x: p50 24 24 21 p99 27 27 27 Gcycles 299 432 308 10x: p50 31 31 41 p99 40...

...he optimization patch. That showed no significant difference with upstream. upstream napi +at-rx TCP_STREAM: 1x: Mbps 30537 37666 37910 Gcycles 400 540 405 10x: Mbps 41012 39954 40245 Gcycles 434 546 421 100x: Mbps 34088 34172 34245 Gcycles 435 546 418 TCP_RR Latency (us): 1x: p50 24 24 21 p99 27 27 27 Gcycles 299 432 308 10x: p50 31 31 41 p99 40...

Dear All, I just read an announcement saying that Mathematica is launching a version working with Nvidia GPUs. It is claimed that it'd make it ~10-100x faster! http://www.physorg.com/news146247669.html I was wondering if you are aware of any development going into this direction with R? Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Best wishes, Emmanuel

http://pastebin.com/vxGM2n5j We are getting those errors 100x per second in console when AGI set debug is on.... It is causing extremely high CPU usage, we've tried asterisk version 1.6.1.22 and 1.6.2.18 It seems the problem is worse in 1.6.2.18 Can someone advise how to fix this? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was s...

On 17/09/17 18:03, Niklas Hamb?chen wrote: > So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe > is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't. > > But when I `cd` into the dir and run `ls` without directory argument, it > is still much faster than bup index for each stat(). Hmm, bup uses the fchdir() syscall to go into the target

I found the reason now, at least for this set of lstat()s I was looking at. bup first does all getdents(), obtaining all file names in the directory, and then stat()s them. Apparently this destroys some of gluster's caching, making stat()s ~100x slower. What caching could this be, and how could I convince gluster to serve these stat()s as fast as if a getdents() had been done just before them?

...will *NOT* work. Just a > 0.1% difference between the two sampling rates (it's sometimes worse > than that) means that the impulse response drifts by 8 samples every > second. There's just no way to efficiently track this. Or at least no > way that doesn't involve something 100x more complex than what I have > now. So if you want to use two different soundcards, you should either: > 1) Have professionals cards connected with a clock sync > 2) Have an atomic clock in both cards > 3) Forget about echo cancellation > > Jean-Marc