search for: rzmq

...; or Linux? > > Best regards > > Paul > > 2016-12-29 16:00 GMT-05:00 Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>: > >> Read the system requirements [1]. I don't think you can do this on windows. >> >> [1] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rzmq/index.html >> -- >> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> On December 29, 2016 12:23:26 PM PST, Paul Bernal <paulbernal07 at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> After connecting to a mirror, I typed the following command: >>> >>> i...

Hi, Paul. I maintian the rzmq project. love to get it running on windows, but zmq doesn't play nicely with R's mingw. These guys have taken the approach of building the entire zmq library inside the R package: https://github.com/snoweye/pbdZMQ I suggest you give it a try. or if you want to attempt to compile libzmq s...

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Whit Armstrong <armstrong.whit at gmail.com> wrote: > > I maintian the rzmq project. > > love to get it running on windows, but zmq doesn't play nicely with R's > mingw. It's fairly easy to link against the libraries from rwinlib: https://github.com/rwinlib/zeromq. I'll send you a pull request later this week to fix the binary packages for win+mac...

Hi, sorry if this question is trivial or unclear, this is my first venture into mixed C/R programming (I am reasonably experienced in each separately). I am trying to write a serialization function for a format called typedbytes, which is used as an interchange format in Hadoop circles. Since I would need to serialize according to the internal R format many small R objects I looked at the c

Hello, I'm working with the gam function and due to the amount of data I am working with it is taking a long time to run. I looked at the tips to get it to run faster, but none have acceptable side effects. That is the real problem. I have accepted that gam will run a long time. I will be running gam many times for many different models. To make gam useable I am looking at splitting the work

Just a few observations now that I have completed the upgrade from RSpec-1 to RSpec-2. 1. In my project (2800 examples across about 40 files), MRI 1.9.2-p0 takes roughly 3 times longer to complete the spec run. Runtimes grew from 2.2s (rspec 1.3.0) to 6.1s (2.0.0.rc). 2. Rubinius 1.1.0 runs RSpec-2 without error. 3. JRuby 1.5.1 runs RSpec-2 without error. 4. Both Rubinius and JRuby print a