search for: rwxxxxsp

Hi, I have some S functions plus Fortran routines that I want to use in R. They work in S, but when I try to use "dyn.load" to link fortran codes in R , I get the following error. thanks, reza (I am using R-1.0.1 on windows NT, The name of fortran file (compiled Ratfor) is deldirld.o and it's in the D:\Reza\476\tv.gonsrc.R\ directory) >dyn.load("deldirld.o") Error in

....uk/pub/bdr/RWin/tools.zip", even if my package > has > > no C nor Fortran nor C++ sources? > > No/Yes. > No: you don't need the C and Fortran compiler but > Yes: if I understand, you have been found a problem in the > src/gnuwin32/Makefile distributed in rwxxxxsp.zip. This Makefile > try to build the export library for R.dll also for packages > which don't need them. > > You can try the following routes: > 1) edit src/gnuwin32/Makefile, find the line > pkg-%: libR.a #... > and change it to > pkg-%: #lib...

I am trying to port the splancs library for S++ version 4.0 to R. I have modified the original FORTRAN to use dllwrap/dlltool (e.g. removed common blocks). I have been able to generate dll's (splancs.dll) using dllwrap/dlltool and Ming32 g77 with a -mdll switch. As of yet I have not been able to generate a dll that can be loaded by R. Does anyone out there have any suggestions. An example

Indeed, there is no file named "dlltool" anywhere around here! So, at last I am beginning to suspect that my collection of tools is incomplete. What I have got is "rw1020sp.zip" and "http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/tools.zip". These are properly istalled, I think. readme.packages says "If your package has no C nor Fortran nor C++ sources, see `Simple

I would like to compile for Windows a rather simple R package that contains some C code. It does not contain any Fortran code. I tried the cross-compilation route using the pre-built set of tools from http://www.devolution.com/~slouken/SDL/Xmingw32/, as described in $R_SRC/src/gnuwin32/INSTALL Using the sources in r-devel from the rsync site I am able to build libR.a in src/gnuwin32 but I