search for: rw1

I'm trying to build and install Samba 3.0.30 on a Solaris 9 SPARC machine. When I do a "make test", the RW1 test is failing. If I go back and configure and build 3.0.28 with the same settings, and do a make test, everything passes. Here's what I'm seeing with 3.0.30: ---8<--- Testing RW1 (0) TEST OUTPUT: host=127.0.0.2 share=tmp user=root myname=cannes Running RW1 starting readwritetest un...

...hing strange going on in the forward fit? (I don't want to discuss here if the forward fit is a good thing to do from a data analytic viewpoint. I agree that I should presumably not choose it. However, I want to understand what the algorithm does.) Thank you, Christian > w6 <- lm(Preis~RW1+WFL+WQ+VD+Lage+Lage*WFL+Lage*WQ+Lage*VD, + data=wohnung) > w7 <- lm(Preis~1, data=wohnung) > fs7 <- stepAIC(w7,scope=list(upper=~RW1+WFL+WQ+VD+Lage+Lage*WFL+Lage*WQ+Lage*VD, + lower=~1), direction="forward") Start: AIC= 623.57...

.../des3_ede-asm_64.S index 8e49ce117494..4bbd3ec78df5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/crypto/des3_ede-asm_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/des3_ede-asm_64.S @@ -138,21 +138,29 @@ movzbl RW0bl, RT2d; \ movzbl RW0bh, RT3d; \ shrq $16, RW0; \ - movq s8(, RT0, 8), RT0; \ - xorq s6(, RT1, 8), to; \ + leaq s8(%rip), RW1; \ + movq (RW1, RT0, 8), RT0; \ + leaq s6(%rip), RW1; \ + xorq (RW1, RT1, 8), to; \ movzbl RW0bl, RL1d; \ movzbl RW0bh, RT1d; \ shrl $16, RW0d; \ - xorq s4(, RT2, 8), RT0; \ - xorq s2(, RT3, 8), to; \ + leaq s4(%rip), RW1; \ + xorq (RW1, RT2, 8), RT0; \ + leaq s2(%rip), RW1; \ + xorq (RW1, RT...

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

...bnet address is given, 0.0.0.0/0 is assumed. When you add a host or subnet to a zone, Shorewall will NOT create rules allowing that host/subnet to communicate with itself through the firewall. To use this facility for ipsec road warriors: a) Define a zone for each class of Road Warrior. e.g.: rw1 RW1 Road Warrior class 1 rw2 RW2 Road Warrior class 2 You can leave these zones empty -- Shorewall will issue a warning about each of them at startup but these warnings are expected and can be safely ignored. b) Define the rules and policies for these zones normally. c) In /etc/shorewall/interf...

Hi there, I am plotting relative warp scores (equivalent to pca scores) and I want to label (color code and shape) the points by group. I can't figure out how to do this beyond simple plotting. plot(RW1, RW2); Do I need to make vectors of each group and then plot them separately onto the same plot? How do I go about this? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Labeling-points-on-plot-on-relative-warp-scores--tp23002055p23002055.html Sent from the R help mailing list arch...

"May you live in interesting times" Is this a curse or a blessing? :) I've just tested a 3.1.5 GlusterFS native client against a 3.1.3 storage pool using this volume: Volume Name: pfs-rw1 Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: jc1letgfs16-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01 Brick2: jc1letgfs13-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01 Brick3: jc1letgfs16-pfs1:/export/read-write/g02 Brick4: jc1letgfs13-pfs1:/export/read-write/g02 Options...

Hello, I have two rows which are almost identical but miss different values at different locations. I would like to merge these two rows so that the missing values are replaced by the element in the same column on the other row making one row. If both rows contain a NA, NA remains in the output. 1 2 3 4 5 Row1 AA AG GG NA NA Row2 NA AG GG AA NA The

...s an example. After some hiccups (Guido told me about the need to set make_mode=UNIX) I got to the following: `make pkg-acepack' runs without error (see below), but it does not * compile any .f file in acepack/src * (hence) try to create any dll file or libs (I'm working with Rw1000 under Win98, with the cygwin tools.) Looking into the MakePkg it looks like the following line LSOURCES=$(wildcard $(SSPKG)/*.c $(SSPKG)/*.f) produces a blank. Inside MakeDll there is another `wildcard' that also produces a blank: SOURCES=$(wildcard -f *.c *.f) Thanks for any hin...

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

...TORTURE RANDOMIPC NBW95 NBWNT default test is ALL But the smbtorture compiled with Gentoo's 3.0.2a gives me tests are: FDPASS LOCK1 LOCK2 LOCK3 LOCK4 LOCK5 LOCK6 LOCK7 UNLINK BROWSE ATTR TRANS2 MAXFID TORTURE RANDOMIPC NEGNOWAIT NBENCH OPLOCK1 OPLOCK2 OPLOCK3 DIR DIR1 DENY1 DENY2 TCON TCONDEV RW1 RW2 RW3 OPEN OPENATTR XCOPY RENAME DELETE PROPERTIES MANGLE W2K TRANS2SCAN NTTRANSSCAN UTABLE CASETABLE ERRMAPEXTRACT PIPE_NUMBER TCON2 IOCTL CHKPATH FDSESS default test is ALL What is the new equivalent to NBW95 and NBWNT, and what do you have to do to make them work nicely? - -Tom -----BEGIN P...