search for: runtests

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 223 matches for "runtests".

Did you mean: runtest
2010 Sep 21
4
[LLVMdev] inline asm constraints examples/tests
Thanks, Stuart. Sorry, I had some left-over editing cruft in my email. >From Googling runtest, I had found dejagnu, which I'd heard some folks were using over there, so I used the local package manager to install it. But from what you said I went ahead and got the dejagnu sources and built it, but had problems in running make install, which is trying to put it /usr/local/bin rather than
2005 Aug 24
3
[LLVMdev] Problems running dejagnu tests
I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite
2005 Jan 07
3
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it on the command line? I get this: ------------------- $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Expect version is 5.21 Tcl version is 8.0 Framework version is 1.4.4 ------------------- and ------------------- $ ls /usr/local/share/dejagnu/
2005 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
> I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it > on the command line? > > I get this: > ------------------- > $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log > WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. > Expect version is 5.21 > Tcl version is 8.0 > Framework version is 1.4.4 > ------------------- It looks
2005 Jan 07
3
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
You're right. And no errors or results where generated: -------------------- if test -d "/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/test" ; then \ if test -f "/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/test/Makefile" ; then \ echo llvm[0]: Running test suite ; \ make -C /C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/test check-local \ TESTSUITE= ; \ else \ echo llvm[0]: No Makefile in
2003 Jan 21
2
[patch] Two problems in testsuite (POSIX, perms)
...wn () After my patch, you get the appropriate output: SKIP chown (Can't chown (probably need root)) The problem that you might notice if you have had your coffee already this morning is that it is attempting to cat the file WITH quotations. The line that causes the problem is line 233 of runtests.sh: echo "SKIP $testbase (`cat \"$scratchdir/whyskipped\"`)" This is a POSIXLY_CORRECT behavior on part of the OpenBSD sh according to the sh man page which has a specific section on it: o Occurrences of \" inside double quoted `..` command substitution...
2005 Jan 07
4
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
Hi, I'm trying to test the llvm tools as described in 'http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html'. However, when running the command: 'make check VERBOSE=1 2>&1' I get this error: ------------------- if test -d "/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/test" ; then \ if test -f "/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/test/Makefile" ; then \ echo
2017 Mar 01
2
Noisy benchmark results?
On 28 Feb 2017, at 22:50, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com<mailto:mzolotukhin at apple.com>> wrote: I also usually rerun suspiciously improved or regressed tests to verify the performance change. Most of the time, if it was just a noise, the test doesn’t appear on another run. I wish LNT (or any other script) could do that for me :) Michael Doesn't the lnt runtest nt
2005 May 18
1
[LLVMdev] runtest on cygwin for a gdb built on mingw failed
Hi, as you know dejagnu and expect have not yet been ported to MinGW correctly, so, I need to know how can I run runtest on cygwin for a gdb that was built on mingw Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34€/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Jun 19
2
Using lnt to run SPEC tests: possible or not?
It appears that lnt has the capability to run the SPEC2000/2006/2017(maybe) tests from looking at the options and from poking around in the mailing list archives. Or does it? I experimented a bit and cannot get it to work right. However, it isn't really documented anywhere so maybe I didn't set it up properly. Plus there's all the mention of llvmgcc... So is anyone doing
2005 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > You're right. And no errors or results where generated: > PATH=/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/Debug/bin:/C/projects/src/llvm-2/llvm/test/Scripts:.:/usr/local/bin:/mingw/bin:/bin:/mingw/bin:/usr/bin:/c/LLVM/tools:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin/MSWin32-x86-multi-thread > \ > true runtest > make[1]: Leaving directory
2017 Feb 27
8
Noisy benchmark results?
Hi, I'm trying to run the benchmark suite: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#test-suite-quickstart I'm doing it the lnt way, as described at: http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html I don't know what to expect but the results seems to be quite noisy and unstable. E.g I've done two runs on two different commits that only differ by a space in CODE_OWNERS.txt on my 12
2005 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
Now, I've no spaces in my path: ------------------ $ echo $PATH .:/usr/local/bin:/mingw/bin:/bin:/mingw/bin:/usr/bin:/c/LLVM/tools:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin/MSWin32-x86-multi-thread ------------------ I've found that you safely can delete site.exp. The new values in site.exp are: ------------------ ## these variables are automatically generated by make ## # Do not edit here.
2009 Mar 06
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6169] New: Syntax Error in runtests.sh "ssh-basic.test" script
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6169 Summary: Syntax Error in runtests.sh "ssh-basic.test" script Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: reine...
2005 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] built on mingw and runtest on cygwin
Hi, as you know dejagnu and expect have not yet been ported to MinGW correctly, so, I need to know how can I run runtest on cygwin for a gdb that was built on mingw Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34€/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 May 20
1
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] clean build and install :)
Got a clean build and install now :))) Many thanks for all your help. Wish I had known a few basic things about Cygwin and GNU before tackling this. A few last things ... > Okay I will check the configuration properly. I can do without doxygen, and etags, for now, but need runtest, what about tcl, and dot. Okay got runtest, and doxygen now. Cannot find tcl on Cygwin, I may allready
2005 Aug 24
1
[LLVMdev] Problems running dejagnu tests
OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this
2005 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] make check fails on mingw
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > I'm trying to test the llvm tools as described in > 'http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html'. The problem here is that your PATH envvar has spaces in it. There are many thing in LLVM that won't work with that, please try pruning your PATH and trying again. Thanks, -Chris > However, when running the command: 'make
2017 Apr 09
2
Possible stack corruption during call to JITSymbol::getAddress()
Firstly, apologies if this is not the right place to be asking this question--feel free to point me in the correct direction. I could be doing something wrong here but stackoverflow didn't feel like the correct place for this since there's so little there about LLVM ORC. Basically, I have a reproduction case (below) where if I throw an exception before I call JITSymbol::getAddress()
2017 Feb 27
3
Noisy benchmark results?
Two other things: 1) I get massively more stable execution times on 16.04 than on 14.04 on both x86 and ARM because 16.04 does far fewer gratuitous moves from one core to another, even without explicit pinning. 2) turn off ASLR: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space". As well as getting stable addresses for debugging repeatability, it also stabilizes execution time