Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "run_client".
Did you mean:
rpc_client
2015 Mar 06
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 6.8
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, mikep at noc.utoronto.ca wrote:
> Re-testing 'openssh-SNAP-20150305' on Solaris 10, with 'gcc':
>
> Configure, 'make' complete; 'make tests' fails at:
>
> postcondition check failed: setstat readonly
I couldn't reporoduce this on an illumos zone that I had access to,
will try installing solaris10 next.
-d
2023 Aug 31
0
[RFC PATCH v2 2/2] test/vsock: shutdowned socket test
...eln("SHUTRDDONE");
>+ control_expectln("CLIENTDONE");
>+
>+ close(fd);
>+}
>+
> static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> {
> .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
>@@ -1250,6 +1378,16 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> .run_client = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_client,
> .run_server = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_server,
> },
>+ {
>+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM SHUT_WR",
>+ .run_client = test_stream_shutwr_client,
>+ .run_server = test_stream_shutwr_server,
>+ },
>+ {
>+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM S...
2019 Aug 01
0
[PATCH v2 07/11] VSOCK: add AF_VSOCK test cases
...}
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++) {
+ if (i % 2)
+ send_byte(fds[i], 1);
+ else
+ recv_byte(fds[i], 1);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
+ close(fds[i]);
+}
+
+static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
+ .run_client = test_stream_connection_reset,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM client close",
+ .run_client = test_stream_client_close_client,
+ .run_server = test_stream_client_close_server,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM server close",
+ .run_client = test_stream_server_close_client,
+...
2019 Oct 09
2
[PATCH v2 07/11] VSOCK: add AF_VSOCK test cases
...v_byte(fds[i], 1);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
> + close(fds[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
> + .run_client = test_stream_connection_reset,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_STREAM client close",
> + .run_client = test_stream_client_close_client,
> + .run_server = test_stream_client_close_server,
> + },
> + {
&g...
2019 Oct 09
2
[PATCH v2 07/11] VSOCK: add AF_VSOCK test cases
...v_byte(fds[i], 1);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
> + close(fds[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
> + .run_client = test_stream_connection_reset,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_STREAM client close",
> + .run_client = test_stream_client_close_client,
> + .run_server = test_stream_client_close_server,
> + },
> + {
&g...
2019 Aug 01
13
[PATCH v2 00/11] VSOCK: add vsock_test test suite
The vsock_diag.ko module already has a test suite but the core AF_VSOCK
functionality has no tests. This patch series adds several test cases that
exercise AF_VSOCK SOCK_STREAM socket semantics (send/recv, connect/accept,
half-closed connections, simultaneous connections).
Stefan: Do you think we should have a single application or is better to
split it in single tests (e.g.
2019 Dec 18
13
[PATCH net-next v3 00/11] VSOCK: add vsock_test test suite
The vsock_diag.ko module already has a test suite but the core AF_VSOCK
functionality has no tests. This patch series adds several test cases that
exercise AF_VSOCK SOCK_STREAM socket semantics (send/recv, connect/accept,
half-closed connections, simultaneous connections).
The v1 of this series was originally sent by Stefan.
v3:
- Patch 6:
* check the byte received in the recv_byte()
* use
2023 Mar 20
0
[RFC PATCH v1 3/3] test/vsock: skbuff merging test
...sts in this suite!
Stefano
>+
>+ control_writeln("REPLY1");
>+
>+ close(fd);
>+}
>+
> static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> {
> .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
>@@ -1038,6 +1114,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> .run_client = test_seqpacket_inv_buf_client,
> .run_server = test_seqpacket_inv_buf_server,
> },
>+ {
>+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM virtio skb merge",
>+ .run_client = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client,
>+ .run_server = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server,
>+ },
> {},
>...
2015 Mar 11
4
Call for testing: OpenSSH 6.8
...h
> +++ b/regress/sftp-perm.sh
> @@ -41,13 +41,17 @@ ro_test() {
> verbose "$tid: read-only $_desc"
> # Plain (no options, mostly to test that _cmd is good)
> prepare_files "$_prep"
> + printf "XXX PRE RW: " ; ls -l $COPY
> prepare_server
> run_client "$_cmd" || fail "plain $_desc failed"
> + printf "XXX POST RW: " ; ls -l $COPY
> postcondition "$_desc no-readonly" "$_expect_success_post"
> # Read-only enabled
> prepare_files "$_prep"
> + printf "XXX PRE RO: "...
2020 May 05
7
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Matthieu Hautreux wrote:
>> The change proposed by Cyril in sftp is a very pragmatic approach to
>> deal with parallelism at the file transfer level. It leverages the
>> already existing sftp protocol and its capability to write/read file
>> content at specified offsets. This enables to speed up sftp transfers
>> significantly by