search for: ruga

Hi! Those are used if #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently officially supported one. Aki On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: > dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not available on libressl 2.4.3: > > HMAC_CTX_new > HMAC_CTX_free > EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY > EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA > OBJ_length > EVP_MD_CTX_new > EVP_MD_CTX_free > > The result of calling a non-existent fu...

...ION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L >> >> So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using >> GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently >> officially supported one. >> >> Aki >> >> >> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >>> available on libressl 2.4.3: >>> >>> HMAC_CTX_new >>> HMAC_CTX_free >>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >>> EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA >>> OBJ_length >>> EVP_MD_C...

OpenSSL v1.0.1 is enough. Aki > On November 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > We cannot upgrade from 2.2.24, because we use libressl and the newer > dovecot versions demand openssl v1.1. > > Please add the new library requirement to the INSTALL file. > > All the best. > > >...

...libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using >>>> GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently >>>> officially supported one. >>>> >>>> Aki >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >>>>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >>>>> available on libressl 2.4.3: >>>>> >>>>> HMAC_CTX_new >>>>> HMAC_CTX_free >>>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >>>>> EVP_PKE...

...define. We compile our code using >>>>> GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently >>>>> officially supported one. >>>>> >>>>> Aki >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >>>>>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >>>>>> available on libressl 2.4.3: >>>>>> >>>>>> HMAC_CTX_new >>>>>> HMAC_CTX_free >>>>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >...

Comparison of Dovecot, Uwash, Courier, Cyrus and M-Box: http://www.isode.com/whitepapers/mbox-benchmark.html

...nssl.c, ssl.m4 and HMAC_CTX_free(NULL) Please discuss this with busterb at GitHub. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime) Local Time: 25 February 2017 8:54 PM UTC Time: 25 February 2017 19:54 From: tss at iki.fi To: Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> On 25 Feb 2017, at 21.11, Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > > t_strftime and variants now .......................................... : ok > > > test-time-util.c:123: Assert failed: strcmp(t...

...o another project because of it. Especially with places like github that make it easy for members of the community to create and maintain such a patch, it may be the best option if the project itself doesn't have someone who can officially maintain LibreSSL support. On 11/02/2016 05:08 AM, Ruga wrote: > libressl is a leaner and safer openssl > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Michael A. Peters <'mpeters at domblogger.net'> wrote: > IMHO it would be acceptable to have a LibreSSL patch that is maintained > by the peop...

t_strftime and variants now .......................................... : ok test-time-util.c:123: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strftime(RFC2822_FMT, gmtime(&ts)), exp) == 0 test-time-util.c:124: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strfgmtime(RFC2822_FMT, ts), exp) == 0 t_strftime and variants fixed timestamp .............................. : FAILED timings 0

...used if > > #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L > > So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using > GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently > officially supported one. > > Aki > > > On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >> available on libressl 2.4.3: >> >> HMAC_CTX_new >> HMAC_CTX_free >> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >> EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA >> OBJ_length >> EVP_MD_CTX_new >> EVP_MD_CTX_free &gt...

...;> >>> So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using >>> GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently >>> officially supported one. >>> >>> Aki >>> >>> >>> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >>>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >>>> available on libressl 2.4.3: >>>> >>>> HMAC_CTX_new >>>> HMAC_CTX_free >>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA >>>>...

...define. We compile our code using >>>>> GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently >>>>> officially supported one. >>>>> >>>>> Aki >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: >>>>>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not >>>>>> available on libressl 2.4.3: >>>>>> >>>>>> HMAC_CTX_new >>>>>> HMAC_CTX_free >>>>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY >...

...problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm 3.9.0 to see them all. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30 PM UTC Time: 1 November 2016 18:30 From: aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>, Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> OpenSSL v1.0.1 is enough. Aki > On November 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > We cannot upgrade from 2.2.24, because we use libressl and the newer > dovecot versions demand openssl v1.1. > > Pl...

https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/278

On 5 Feb 2017, at 19.49, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 4 Feb 2017, at 20.03, Ruga <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: >> >> https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/278 > > I've no idea why that would happen. The only idea I had got rejected by someone. Oh, that's with OSX. I think that's the reason. Nothing to do with libressl. I...

How? :) On May 3, 2017 5:25:51 PM GMT+02:00, Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: >Problem solved. > >Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > >On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> >wrote: >Hello, > >Thunderbird has been bugging us with connection errors. Dovecot is >installed on a local s...

It is a jolly bad idea to use the same password for both email and system access. On TLS+plaintext, if your passwords are slurped by a python script, all accounts are compromised. Congratulations, the NSA will love you. On the other side of the ocean, however, there are European states where you must disclose the fact, or go to jail. (I tried to protect dovecot passwords with bcrypt, but the

...> > Especially with places like github that make it easy for members of > the community to create and maintain such a patch, it may be the best > option if the project itself doesn't have someone who can officially > maintain LibreSSL support. > > On 11/02/2016 05:08 AM, Ruga wrote: >> libressl is a leaner and safer openssl >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Michael A. Peters >> <'mpeters at domblogger.net'> wrote: >> IMHO it would be acceptable to have a LibreSSL pat...

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.26.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.26.0.tar.gz.sig v2.2.26 had a couple of nasty bugs left in it, so here's a fixup release. The version number is also a little bit weird, but had to be done this way (although 2.2.26.0.1 could have been another possibility). - Fixed some compiling issues. - auth: Fixed

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.26.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.26.0.tar.gz.sig v2.2.26 had a couple of nasty bugs left in it, so here's a fixup release. The version number is also a little bit weird, but had to be done this way (although 2.2.26.0.1 could have been another possibility). - Fixed some compiling issues. - auth: Fixed